GM Chairman Ed Whitacre: Fitting In Already

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

GM’s government-appointed Chairman of the Board was out and about last night, speechifying at Texas Lutheran University. Ed Whitacre used the occasion to plea for the “modification” of Pay Czar Kenneth’s Feinberg’s pay caps. To recap the caps, the nationalized automaker’s top 25 executives took a 31 percent hair cut since joining the federal payroll. Aside from CEO Fritz “Opel Eyes” Henderson, that is, who had his cash compensation trimmed by just 25 percent (from $1.26 million to a paltry $950,000). Leaving only one other unnamed GM executive—cough, transparency, cough—who will “earn” more than $500,000 cash money for 2009. ‘Cause $500,000’s the new limit. And Ed’s not happy about that. “To find top-level people where you need them, that’s a more difficult thing to do at that salary level,” Whitacre said. “I don’t think [the caps] will be lifted, but hopefully they’ll be modified.” Now there’s a man who knows the value of politics. As for the value of GM stock, same deal. Or, in this case, no deal.

Whitacre shot down his own not-so-highly-paid executives’ promises of a 2010 GM stock offering—the planned method for returning U.S. taxpayer’s $52 billion (plus) investment in GM. “It depends on how quickly we become profitable. I think we can see that on the horizon, but I can’t promise a date.”

Now that’s what I call GM speak! Lots of promises, no firm targets and zero accountability. Looks like Ed’s fitting right in.

Oh, and don’t worry about that dropped IPO. Ed’s gonna maybe kinda sorta ensure that GM makes an unspecified payment to the feds at some unspecified date (ahead of the 2010 mid-term elections, presumably). “It’s conceivable we could pay back some of the loans before the end of the year,” he kinda sorta maybe promised.

Now that’s what I call GM speak! Lots of promises, no firm targets and zero accountability. Looks like Ed’s fitting right in.

Oh, and don’t worry about that cultural change thing. Whitacre said GM isn’t “rushing” to hire outside executives. “GM has made several inside changes recently,” the Detroit News paraphrases, “and the move to bring in new blood will be meted out slowly, he said, without giving timing.”

Now that’s what I call GM speak! Lots of promises, no firm targets and zero accountability. Looks like Ed’s fitting right in.

Oh, and don’t worry about all that talk about increasing market share. Despite his insistence upon protecting GM’s piece of the American new car sales pie, Ed says GM hasn’t set a specific market share goal and doesn’t want to add significantly to incentives. “We are just looking at ways to sell more vehicles, and it’s a very competitive market. We need to strike a balance.

Now that’s what I call GM speak! Lots of promises, no firm targets and zero accountability. Looks like Ed’s fitting right in.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • Steven02 Steven02 on Nov 11, 2009

    Whitacre has been there 5 months. He has done great things at other companies. Maybe giving him more time to see if it works out would be better than just posting sensationalism. It will take a good amount of time for him to fix what is wrong at GM. 5 months isn't long enough.

  • Dilbert Dilbert on Nov 11, 2009

    5 months is long enough to set some general goals and coming up with a plan. He has no goals and seems to be dodging his responsibility.

  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Next