By Ray Wert on May 14, 2006

 As any good debt counselor will tell you, paying down your debt isn't enough. You need enough cash on hand to deal with ongoing expenses and extra funds for any major bills. Otherwise, you end-up scrambling to borrow more money and digging yourself into a deeper hole– until you can't. The same rules apply to General Motors. They need to pay their workers, dealers and suppliers on a regular basis, and they need extra money for large, one-time expenses (e.g. worker buyouts). Although GM claims to have enough money to stay the course, the truth is they are only one "exceptional expense" away from Chapter 11.

According to GM's recent quarterly statement, The General has $17.4b in cash, $1.4b in marketable securities and useable assets of $2.8b in their VEBA (Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association) trust. That works out to $21.6 billion– an increase of around $1.2b from the prior quarter. The financial markets were heartened by the resulting black ink– even though the increase was more a reflection of accounting practices than a healthy increase in income. Despite this optimism, GM's situation is just as precarious as it was throughout '05; the Delphi dilemma remains dangerously unresolved.

The General's bean counters estimate that Delphi's Chapter 11 filing leaves GM with a contingent liability (a.k.a. a bill) between $5.5b and $12b. That's a pretty big range. It's also a curiously precise amount; why $5.5b? Why not $6b? The number reflects the amount of money GM has set aside to deal with their Delphi exposure. Why didn't GM set aside more money? According to the company's quarterly statement, "It is unlikely that a Chapter 11 process will result in both a termination of Delphi's pension plan and complete elimination of its OPEB (post-retirement health care and life insurance) plans."

There are two other possible reasons. First, GM doesn't want to provide an opening for Delphi and the bankruptcy court to raid GM's corporate larder. Second, they ain't got the dough. So, if GM has to shell out at an additional $6.5b to cover its Delphi liabilities, where will they get the money? According to GM, "If any [payments] are required under the benefit guarantees, GM would expect to make such payments from ongoing operating cash flow and financings…" In other words, GM asks us to believe it could finance any and all additional Delphi-related expenses above $200m per year out of its operating cash flow.

Discounting GM's health-care cost shift, GM earned $200m-plus this last quarter. Do the math: profit gone. If the worst case scenario occurs, if there's a mass retirement or layoff of pensioned Delphi workers, GM would be on the hook for far more than their estimate of $224m per year (the amount Delphi paid-out in fiscal year 2004). The $224m figure doesn't take into account the expenses GM would incur from the release of an additional 30,000 laid-off Delphi employees– each with benefits and pension liabilities. That would cost The General an estimated $2.1b per year.

Still, that leaves GM $21b and change to work with, right? Subtract $8b in operating expenses for the revolving fund (so they can continue to build cars), deduct $5.5 to $10b for the Delphi thing, remove $2b to $3b for debt payments (which look to be spiraling upwards after the Fed Reserve Board announced the up-tick in rates this week), take away $3b for the early retirements package, leave off the $3b – $4b in overseas funds (which GM can't bring over without tax repercussions) and you've got just enough money to pay for… well… nothing.

GM may soon find itself with zero cash reserves. In fact, there are some on this site who point to the recent sale of assets and change in GM's accounts payable policy (to 55 days) and suggest that the world's largest automaker is already running on fumes. In any case, there are plenty of ways GM could find itself with a big bill it simply can't afford: a sudden pull-out by the banks guaranteeing rental car sales, a Delphi strike, suppliers demanding cash up front, a continuing drop in SUV sales due to rising gas prices and more.

A careful reading of GM's quarterly report reveals that GM isn't sure that it can get any more money under its existing line of credit (which is currently being re-written as a secured line). If GM needs more cash… there might not be any. Meanwhile, GM can't afford to pay-off and shed excess dealers. It can't afford to invest heavily in new, domestically produced vehicles. It can't market its vehicles properly. If GM's income doesn't rise, it grows steadily, inevitably weaker. At some point, perhaps soon, one unforeseen bill may make Chapter 11 General Motors' best– if not only– option.

No Comments on “General Motors Death Watch 73: Running on Empty...”

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You can also login using Facebook Connect. Connect with Facebook

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Tata Defends JLR Acquisition

    Ion - I wonder if SAIC is still intrested in the Rover moniker, Tata may be able to sell that. They probably could sell Land Rover and Jaguar to GM, once GM drops the...
  • Re: EPA: New Car Fuel Economy Continues to Improve; Back to Early 1980’s Level

    Nutsaboutcars - There was nothing speculative in what I said. It was based on tons of past data that prove my point,...
  • Re: Tata Defends JLR Acquisition

    Nutsaboutcars - I have a ton of respect for Mr. Ratan Tata,  but his Jaguar remarks are wishful thinking and whistling in the dark. Jag and L-R could not make a dime well...
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Car Are You?

    Nutsaboutcars - After Driving the previous Prius for 3 days in the LAX area in April and June, my opinion of the car went up by a huge amount. Well behaved,...
  • Re: Take Two: 2009 Honda Accord LX Review

    bollocks - Sherman lin “I had a 91 EX with automatic and I miss it dearly. That car was head and shoulders above every other midsize offering then. I wish I had...
  • Re: Capsule Review: Mercedes Benz 190E 2.3-16

    Bulldog Drummond - Hi there, driving in the uk is hardly the same as hammering the back roads but interested to read your comments on the Merc steering....
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Car Are You?

    oldowl - Was: mid-1980s Saab 99L (lime green) Am: 2010 Prius IV (winter gray)
  • Re: Review: Porsche GT3

    bollocks - I think some of you are being too hard on Sajeev.  Until a few years ago, I never understood why people went gaga over the 911.  It’s archaic.  It’s not...
  • Re: Karmann Lives, Kindof

    mpresley - That may be true, but no one could match the number of snaps (half of them not working) on the top of my old MG Midge.  Besides, what’s a little water between...
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Car Are You?

    ragtopman - I’m practical but want a little fun out of life. Getting there is sometimes more important than being there. Has to be a convertible. My wife found...

 


Auto Insurance GPS Navigation
Car Loans Auto Parts
Car Warranty Wheels
Automotive Tires Car Care