<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: General Motors Death Watch 193: Rough Seas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:58:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SAAB95JD</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-2/#comment-716381</link>
		<dc:creator>SAAB95JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-716381</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if anyone has ever mentioned this in past GM Deathwatch posts, but... we might well look to the history of the British automobile industry for guidance.  As we know, it does not exist anymore.  They tried Government loans, they tried bailouts, they even tried partnerships with Japanese manufacturers.  BUT, in the end the industry died anyway.  

SO, should we waste our tax dollars (at a time when we can least afford it thanks to &quot;W&quot; and their camp) to bail out a company that deserves to crash?  Let them file, shrink and if they remain uncompetitive they die.  Simple as that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I don&#8217;t know if anyone has ever mentioned this in past GM Deathwatch posts, but&#8230; we might well look to the history of the British automobile industry for guidance.  As we know, it does not exist anymore.  They tried Government loans, they tried bailouts, they even tried partnerships with Japanese manufacturers.  BUT, in the end the industry died anyway.  </p>
<p>SO, should we waste our tax dollars (at a time when we can least afford it thanks to &#8220;W&#8221; and their camp) to bail out a company that deserves to crash?  Let them file, shrink and if they remain uncompetitive they die.  Simple as that.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jurisb</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-2/#comment-713711</link>
		<dc:creator>jurisb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-713711</guid>
		<description>OF course, trucks were money makers. Firstly it used more domestic contents. Meaning bigger profit margins stayed within US. For example every Opel Ecotec engine installed sends 850 dollars to germany, every Aisin gearbox on your Malibu- 750 dollars to Japan. Malibu flooerpan itself, being based on Vectra gives over 700 dollars to Germany. EVery Pontiac Vibe 2300 to Japan, etc. No wonder Gm is bleedind cash.
Secondly trucks are more primitive, easier to go along with domestic engineering capabilities. Trucks have leaf springs, live rear axle, 4 speed autos, OHVs, etc. Those who buy trucks rarely crawl underneath their rigs to check how updated the underpinnings are. The smart guys don`t crawl either, they go to imports which makes them not to need to crawl underneath. They can be sure This explains how Toyota can sell Sequoia but Pontiac can`t sell G5. Never mind the gas prices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->OF course, trucks were money makers. Firstly it used more domestic contents. Meaning bigger profit margins stayed within US. For example every Opel Ecotec engine installed sends 850 dollars to germany, every Aisin gearbox on your Malibu- 750 dollars to Japan. Malibu flooerpan itself, being based on Vectra gives over 700 dollars to Germany. EVery Pontiac Vibe 2300 to Japan, etc. No wonder Gm is bleedind cash.<br />
Secondly trucks are more primitive, easier to go along with domestic engineering capabilities. Trucks have leaf springs, live rear axle, 4 speed autos, OHVs, etc. Those who buy trucks rarely crawl underneath their rigs to check how updated the underpinnings are. The smart guys don`t crawl either, they go to imports which makes them not to need to crawl underneath. They can be sure This explains how Toyota can sell Sequoia but Pontiac can`t sell G5. Never mind the gas prices.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dutchchris</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-2/#comment-713511</link>
		<dc:creator>Dutchchris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 08:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-713511</guid>
		<description>This article doubts that GM could survive chapter 11 because it doesn&#039;t make amends for a failed product line, it wouldn&#039;t change the cost structure much and people would be even more reluctant to buy products that involve a long term commitment (service/warranty) from a company that&#039;s in a bankruptcy situation:

 href=&quot;http://biz.yahoo.com/usnews/080822/22_how_bankruptcy_would_wreck_gm_and_chrysler.html&quot;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->This article doubts that GM could survive chapter 11 because it doesn&#8217;t make amends for a failed product line, it wouldn&#8217;t change the cost structure much and people would be even more reluctant to buy products that involve a long term commitment (service/warranty) from a company that&#8217;s in a bankruptcy situation:</p>
<p> href=&#8221;http://biz.yahoo.com/usnews/080822/22_how_bankruptcy_would_wreck_gm_and_chrysler.html&#8221;&gt;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tedj101</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-2/#comment-711672</link>
		<dc:creator>tedj101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-711672</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;Chapter 11 is where the workers and management get a judge to screw the equity holders in their favor. Reorganizing the company so that it can take the property bought with the stockholders’ capital, and then putting it up for sale to new stockholders while often simply giving the existing management a lot of the stock. That’s theft or chapter 11.&lt;&gt;What chapter 11 was supposed to be, and what it has become, are two seperate things altogether. It hurts everyone, and only then helps a few people who otherwise would have to look for a job. In the end, I believe it simply reduces the number of jobs available in any given industry.&lt;&lt;

I do agree with you there.  Chapter 11 is often used as a way to liquidate a company without going through Chapter 7.  The company doesn&#039;t survive in such a case, but it isn&#039;t expected to. It is simply a way to sell off the assets (via section 363 sales) in a more efficient way than is available in a Chapter 7.  Whether this is good or bad is a debatable point, but it certainly isn&#039;t what was contemplated.

Regards,
            TED</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&gt;&gt;Chapter 11 is where the workers and management get a judge to screw the equity holders in their favor. Reorganizing the company so that it can take the property bought with the stockholders’ capital, and then putting it up for sale to new stockholders while often simply giving the existing management a lot of the stock. That’s theft or chapter 11.&lt;&gt;What chapter 11 was supposed to be, and what it has become, are two seperate things altogether. It hurts everyone, and only then helps a few people who otherwise would have to look for a job. In the end, I believe it simply reduces the number of jobs available in any given industry.&lt;&lt;</p>
<p>I do agree with you there.  Chapter 11 is often used as a way to liquidate a company without going through Chapter 7.  The company doesn&#8217;t survive in such a case, but it isn&#8217;t expected to. It is simply a way to sell off the assets (via section 363 sales) in a more efficient way than is available in a Chapter 7.  Whether this is good or bad is a debatable point, but it certainly isn&#8217;t what was contemplated.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
            TED<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landcrusher</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-2/#comment-711232</link>
		<dc:creator>Landcrusher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-711232</guid>
		<description>In the money or not is not the end of it at all.

The stockholders are the owners of the company. It is certainly fair that they should have to pay their debts before taking back equity from liquidation. That&#039;s chapter 7.

Chapter 11 is where the workers and management get a judge to screw the equity holders in their favor. Reorganizing the company so that it can take the property bought with the stockholders&#039; capital, and then putting it up for sale to new stockholders while often simply giving the existing management a lot of the stock. That&#039;s theft or chapter 11.

What chapter 11 was supposed to be, and what it has become, are two seperate things altogether. It hurts everyone, and only then helps a few people who otherwise would have to look for a job. In the end, I believe it simply reduces the number of jobs available in any given industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->In the money or not is not the end of it at all.</p>
<p>The stockholders are the owners of the company. It is certainly fair that they should have to pay their debts before taking back equity from liquidation. That&#8217;s chapter 7.</p>
<p>Chapter 11 is where the workers and management get a judge to screw the equity holders in their favor. Reorganizing the company so that it can take the property bought with the stockholders&#8217; capital, and then putting it up for sale to new stockholders while often simply giving the existing management a lot of the stock. That&#8217;s theft or chapter 11.</p>
<p>What chapter 11 was supposed to be, and what it has become, are two seperate things altogether. It hurts everyone, and only then helps a few people who otherwise would have to look for a job. In the end, I believe it simply reduces the number of jobs available in any given industry.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tedj101</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-2/#comment-711061</link>
		<dc:creator>tedj101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-711061</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;Of course you are correct that chapter 7 will not happen, but it would be better for the rest of the world if it did. Even folks in New York would really be better off because the resulting structural changes would help the stock market in the long run. The existing rules on Chapter 11 are totally unfair to equity holders.&lt;&lt;

Why are they unfair?  You are either in the money or you are not.  If you are, you get something, if you aren&#039;t, you don&#039;t.  That is true of all classes of creditors.  Equity happens to be at the bottom of the heirarchy, but you knew that going in as an equity investor...

FWIW, I don&#039;t see GM going in as a Chapter 7.  It is more likely to go in with a liquidating 11 plan which would bring a greater return to the creditors since it would be a controlled liquidation of going concerns instead of a fire sale...

TED</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&gt;&gt;Of course you are correct that chapter 7 will not happen, but it would be better for the rest of the world if it did. Even folks in New York would really be better off because the resulting structural changes would help the stock market in the long run. The existing rules on Chapter 11 are totally unfair to equity holders.&lt;&lt;</p>
<p>Why are they unfair?  You are either in the money or you are not.  If you are, you get something, if you aren&#8217;t, you don&#8217;t.  That is true of all classes of creditors.  Equity happens to be at the bottom of the heirarchy, but you knew that going in as an equity investor&#8230;</p>
<p>FWIW, I don&#8217;t see GM going in as a Chapter 7.  It is more likely to go in with a liquidating 11 plan which would bring a greater return to the creditors since it would be a controlled liquidation of going concerns instead of a fire sale&#8230;</p>
<p>TED<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: menno</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-709702</link>
		<dc:creator>menno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-709702</guid>
		<description>capeplates, the back door is actually the side door.  

SAIC-GM is 50% owned by both, being a JV, but GMDaewoo is part-owned by GMHolden (wholly owned by GM), and part-owned by SAIC of China (as well as having a tiny percentage owned by Suzuki).  

If the Chinese manage to snag GM, it&#039;ll probably be via the route they already have open to them, as a guess.  

Part-ownership of some of GM&#039;s operations already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->capeplates, the back door is actually the side door.  </p>
<p>SAIC-GM is 50% owned by both, being a JV, but GMDaewoo is part-owned by GMHolden (wholly owned by GM), and part-owned by SAIC of China (as well as having a tiny percentage owned by Suzuki).  </p>
<p>If the Chinese manage to snag GM, it&#8217;ll probably be via the route they already have open to them, as a guess.  </p>
<p>Part-ownership of some of GM&#8217;s operations already.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capeplates</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-709052</link>
		<dc:creator>capeplates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-709052</guid>
		<description>Time for the Chinese to move in and take over GM a la Vauxhall in England - invasion by the backdoor is on the cards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Time for the Chinese to move in and take over GM a la Vauxhall in England &#8211; invasion by the backdoor is on the cards<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Campisi</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-709022</link>
		<dc:creator>Campisi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-709022</guid>
		<description>See you at GM Death Watch 200.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->See you at GM Death Watch 200.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landcrusher</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-708162</link>
		<dc:creator>Landcrusher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-708162</guid>
		<description>The status quo is preferable to the unknown. They will put off bankruptcy until they can&#039;t. As soon as they go bankrupt, the creditors are going to latch on to the cash. If there is no cash, then the creditors have a larger interest in the eventual reorganization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The status quo is preferable to the unknown. They will put off bankruptcy until they can&#8217;t. As soon as they go bankrupt, the creditors are going to latch on to the cash. If there is no cash, then the creditors have a larger interest in the eventual reorganization.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-707982</link>
		<dc:creator>mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-707982</guid>
		<description>I like the way you think gamper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I like the way you think gamper.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ex-dtw</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-707402</link>
		<dc:creator>ex-dtw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-707402</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;And there you have it. All three Motown automakers relied on trucks to cover their asses on cars.&lt;/em&gt; 

True, very true, but that does in itself not mean everything.  This is not a static world and renders itself moot if GM can figure out a way to make cars profitable again, soon. (Given, that that doesnt appear to be happening)

&lt;em&gt;At $10/share, GM’s stock price yields a total market value of less than $6b for a $160B revenue company.&lt;/em&gt; 

Revenue is independent of value.  Try projected profits versus market cap.

&lt;em&gt;The credit agencies all mark the corporate credit of the company just a few notches above default, and that’s a gift.&lt;/em&gt; 

Is it?  It is probably pricing in a government bailout, a possible recovery, or some other miracle.  They are priced.

&lt;em&gt;The company’s financial statements chart the changes; GM’s just a breath away from insolvency. As of June 30th, GM&#039;s working capital stands at a deficit of $20b. Total shareholder equity is a staggering $56b in the hole. GM’s net liquidity (cash less debt) remains underwater at $15b. How can GM escape?&lt;/em&gt;

I disagree again.  The only way this is a problem is if there is a &quot;run on the bank&quot; so to speak.  All GM has to do is meet its operations and debt service obligations, which in the short term it can do with cash on hand.

&lt;em&gt;It can’t. There is no light at the end of the tunnel. There’s no amount of restructuring that can save this company.&lt;/em&gt; 

This is a statement of opinion on their strategy, not on there actual cash position.  Yes things look very bleak but the case is not cut and dried in these numbers.

&lt;em&gt;GM will do what automotive suppliers before it-– Delphi, Tower, Dana– have done. File bankruptcy for its North American operations. End the misery, pare the company’s balance sheet, shed brands, complete the transformation.&lt;/em&gt; 

They probably will do this but, again, but if it were certain, GM stock would be worth even less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>And there you have it. All three Motown automakers relied on trucks to cover their asses on cars.</em> </p>
<p>True, very true, but that does in itself not mean everything.  This is not a static world and renders itself moot if GM can figure out a way to make cars profitable again, soon. (Given, that that doesnt appear to be happening)</p>
<p><em>At $10/share, GM’s stock price yields a total market value of less than $6b for a $160B revenue company.</em> </p>
<p>Revenue is independent of value.  Try projected profits versus market cap.</p>
<p><em>The credit agencies all mark the corporate credit of the company just a few notches above default, and that’s a gift.</em> </p>
<p>Is it?  It is probably pricing in a government bailout, a possible recovery, or some other miracle.  They are priced.</p>
<p><em>The company’s financial statements chart the changes; GM’s just a breath away from insolvency. As of June 30th, GM&#8217;s working capital stands at a deficit of $20b. Total shareholder equity is a staggering $56b in the hole. GM’s net liquidity (cash less debt) remains underwater at $15b. How can GM escape?</em></p>
<p>I disagree again.  The only way this is a problem is if there is a &#8220;run on the bank&#8221; so to speak.  All GM has to do is meet its operations and debt service obligations, which in the short term it can do with cash on hand.</p>
<p><em>It can’t. There is no light at the end of the tunnel. There’s no amount of restructuring that can save this company.</em> </p>
<p>This is a statement of opinion on their strategy, not on there actual cash position.  Yes things look very bleak but the case is not cut and dried in these numbers.</p>
<p><em>GM will do what automotive suppliers before it-– Delphi, Tower, Dana– have done. File bankruptcy for its North American operations. End the misery, pare the company’s balance sheet, shed brands, complete the transformation.</em> </p>
<p>They probably will do this but, again, but if it were certain, GM stock would be worth even less.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wstansfi</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-706681</link>
		<dc:creator>wstansfi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-706681</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been trying hard to figure out why GM keeps postponing the inevitable... and then it hit me... It&#039;s because they know that Bush won&#039;t bail them out. Not so sure about Obama and Mcain... Hate to think of my tax dollars going to fund more mediocrity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;ve been trying hard to figure out why GM keeps postponing the inevitable&#8230; and then it hit me&#8230; It&#8217;s because they know that Bush won&#8217;t bail them out. Not so sure about Obama and Mcain&#8230; Hate to think of my tax dollars going to fund more mediocrity&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gamper</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-706122</link>
		<dc:creator>gamper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-706122</guid>
		<description>What I dont understand is this: if bankruptcy is a foregone conclusion, and has been for some time, why hasnt GM already filed?  What lies on the horizon that would give GM reason to hold off for one more minute.  The guys at the RenCen arent as dumb as they are made out to be.  I think Bankruptcy is a last resort, that is still years off.

&lt;strong&gt;Didnt you guys claim with certainty that Chrysler would file for Bankruptcy by August 3rd?&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;Well.....Its August 21st.&lt;/strong&gt;  Why is that point relevant to this discussion? Because it shows that in spite of your inclusion of &quot;facts&quot;, it is still only speculation on your part.  I wont hold my breath for a GM bankruptcy after the employee pricing sales subside.  Particularly with gas prices subsiding.  Hope will spring eternal at GM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->What I dont understand is this: if bankruptcy is a foregone conclusion, and has been for some time, why hasnt GM already filed?  What lies on the horizon that would give GM reason to hold off for one more minute.  The guys at the RenCen arent as dumb as they are made out to be.  I think Bankruptcy is a last resort, that is still years off.</p>
<p><strong>Didnt you guys claim with certainty that Chrysler would file for Bankruptcy by August 3rd?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Well&#8230;..Its August 21st.</strong>  Why is that point relevant to this discussion? Because it shows that in spite of your inclusion of &#8220;facts&#8221;, it is still only speculation on your part.  I wont hold my breath for a GM bankruptcy after the employee pricing sales subside.  Particularly with gas prices subsiding.  Hope will spring eternal at GM.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. D</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-705442</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-705442</guid>
		<description>Charting the past 10 years of GM, understanding finance and corporate economics, taking into consideration the global current economic movement leaves on with only one conclusion:  as Britain went so will America in her auto manufacturing.
There is simply too much &#039;welfarism&#039; woven all through US heavy industry: pensions, killer exec salaries, unions, disastrous leadership, incompetent executives.  Everywhere someone has a hand out for far more cash than they need.
Indeed the perfect storm and she&#039;s been a long time coming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Charting the past 10 years of GM, understanding finance and corporate economics, taking into consideration the global current economic movement leaves on with only one conclusion:  as Britain went so will America in her auto manufacturing.<br />
There is simply too much &#8216;welfarism&#8217; woven all through US heavy industry: pensions, killer exec salaries, unions, disastrous leadership, incompetent executives.  Everywhere someone has a hand out for far more cash than they need.<br />
Indeed the perfect storm and she&#8217;s been a long time coming!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: menno</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-705432</link>
		<dc:creator>menno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-705432</guid>
		<description>These guys are less &quot;scary&quot; than Independence Journal, but if you simply subscribe to the pablum fed to you by the Americagov Elitekontrol Corporruption, it&#039;ll seem to be nonsense to you.   

http://www.dailyreckoning.com/index.html

Actually I found the Independence Journal to be fascinating.  Especially the part about the silver &amp; gold, since I&#039;m a bit of a gold bug.  Interestingly enough, similar sentiment is creeping in the other gold bug sites as well.  

So, to recap, since we&#039;re entering the perfect storm, the powers-that-be have sh!t falling at top speed from the air recirculation device, several tons of the stuff is lining up behind other air recirculation devices, and the rich elite want to get the heck out and stay wealthy, in power and elite - and (literally) to hell with the rest of us - they seem to be trying the same massive trickery they pulled on Wall Street, with silver &amp; gold.  

&quot;Prices&quot; going down while demand is way up and supply is way down?  But &quot;prices&quot; reflect &quot;paper promises of silver &amp; gold&quot; not physical metal?  While the elites buy up physical gold at manipulated low prices with soon to be worthless dollars?  

How long have I been saying to my friends here at TTAC that you need to buy a bit of silver or gold, put a safe in your house and hold it? 

We&#039;ll see within a couple of years (or months, weeks, days or hours), won&#039;t we?  

Or, doesn&#039;t anyone really think that GM going tits up is going to simply knock one of the final chocks out from under this economy, already teetering?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->These guys are less &#8220;scary&#8221; than Independence Journal, but if you simply subscribe to the pablum fed to you by the Americagov Elitekontrol Corporruption, it&#8217;ll seem to be nonsense to you.   </p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailyreckoning.com/index.html</a></p>
<p>Actually I found the Independence Journal to be fascinating.  Especially the part about the silver &amp; gold, since I&#8217;m a bit of a gold bug.  Interestingly enough, similar sentiment is creeping in the other gold bug sites as well.  </p>
<p>So, to recap, since we&#8217;re entering the perfect storm, the powers-that-be have sh!t falling at top speed from the air recirculation device, several tons of the stuff is lining up behind other air recirculation devices, and the rich elite want to get the heck out and stay wealthy, in power and elite &#8211; and (literally) to hell with the rest of us &#8211; they seem to be trying the same massive trickery they pulled on Wall Street, with silver &amp; gold.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Prices&#8221; going down while demand is way up and supply is way down?  But &#8220;prices&#8221; reflect &#8220;paper promises of silver &amp; gold&#8221; not physical metal?  While the elites buy up physical gold at manipulated low prices with soon to be worthless dollars?  </p>
<p>How long have I been saying to my friends here at TTAC that you need to buy a bit of silver or gold, put a safe in your house and hold it? </p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see within a couple of years (or months, weeks, days or hours), won&#8217;t we?  </p>
<p>Or, doesn&#8217;t anyone really think that GM going tits up is going to simply knock one of the final chocks out from under this economy, already teetering?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerry weber</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-705362</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-705362</guid>
		<description>Over 10 years ago GM decided on a strategy to once and for all bury their competitors (who were gettting closer even then). I think it was Ron Zarella who thought that if you fire sale millions of cars on the marketplace with: discounts,cheap leases, &amp; 0 interest, the competitors would starve out and GM whose number one in the World Mfg. capacity would save the day.  No one could grind the stuff out to keep up. Sort of a parallel to Reagan making the Russians crank up the arms race until they went under. Well, we know what happened. The Japanese held on the Koreans still came, the Germans kept up the luxury cars and by proving that the total cost of the car equation was not just price, but a better car and higher resale value in the end. It was this formula that finally did GM in. What we are seeing now is a mop up operation with GM still having now an annual fire sale and the foreigners holding fast on price and image. It&#039;s not if this ends but when.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Over 10 years ago GM decided on a strategy to once and for all bury their competitors (who were gettting closer even then). I think it was Ron Zarella who thought that if you fire sale millions of cars on the marketplace with: discounts,cheap leases, &amp; 0 interest, the competitors would starve out and GM whose number one in the World Mfg. capacity would save the day.  No one could grind the stuff out to keep up. Sort of a parallel to Reagan making the Russians crank up the arms race until they went under. Well, we know what happened. The Japanese held on the Koreans still came, the Germans kept up the luxury cars and by proving that the total cost of the car equation was not just price, but a better car and higher resale value in the end. It was this formula that finally did GM in. What we are seeing now is a mop up operation with GM still having now an annual fire sale and the foreigners holding fast on price and image. It&#8217;s not if this ends but when.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Wade</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-705311</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-705311</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt; NickR :
August 20th, 2008 at 10:46 pm

Please tell me that photo is some kind of computer trickery. Pardon my language, but if I was on that ship, I’d be petrified.&lt;/b&gt;

I was on a US Navy guided missile frigate that the entire bow went so far under water in a typhoon the waves went over the bridge windows.

Terrifying indeed!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><b> NickR :<br />
August 20th, 2008 at 10:46 pm</p>
<p>Please tell me that photo is some kind of computer trickery. Pardon my language, but if I was on that ship, I’d be petrified.</b></p>
<p>I was on a US Navy guided missile frigate that the entire bow went so far under water in a typhoon the waves went over the bridge windows.</p>
<p>Terrifying indeed!!!!!!!!!!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-704932</link>
		<dc:creator>mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-704932</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link rtz,these guys are a litle off the wall but interesting nevertheless.Now this Chapman dude whoa!he is really scary.I can see a few nightmares coming tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Thanks for the link rtz,these guys are a litle off the wall but interesting nevertheless.Now this Chapman dude whoa!he is really scary.I can see a few nightmares coming tonight.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickR</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-704882</link>
		<dc:creator>NickR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-704882</guid>
		<description>Please tell me that photo is some kind of computer trickery.  Pardon my language, but if I was on that ship, I&#039;d be petrified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Please tell me that photo is some kind of computer trickery.  Pardon my language, but if I was on that ship, I&#8217;d be petrified.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-704791</link>
		<dc:creator>rtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-704791</guid>
		<description>Mikey, if you want some &quot;extra reading&quot; that&#039;s &quot;off the deep end&quot;, check out the part under &quot;Bouncing Toward October 7th&quot;:

http://www.independencejournal.com/today.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Mikey, if you want some &#8220;extra reading&#8221; that&#8217;s &#8220;off the deep end&#8221;, check out the part under &#8220;Bouncing Toward October 7th&#8221;:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independencejournal.com/today.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.independencejournal.com/today.htm</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seabrjim</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-704692</link>
		<dc:creator>seabrjim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-704692</guid>
		<description>Excellent piece from Lew Rockwell. TTAC is getting to be a big time force to be reckoned with. Bet Wagoner just hates that he can&#039;t hide his b.s. from everyone. Robert Chapman is another excellent source of no bull financial truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Excellent piece from Lew Rockwell. TTAC is getting to be a big time force to be reckoned with. Bet Wagoner just hates that he can&#8217;t hide his b.s. from everyone. Robert Chapman is another excellent source of no bull financial truth.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-704481</link>
		<dc:creator>mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-704481</guid>
		<description>So we have a timeline,or do we?Great DW Ken. So a reader would have to figure late fall.

 Maybe I&#039;m grasping at straws here but you go on to say &quot;the perfect storm may have passed by then&quot;

  I&#039;m confused are we looking at 6 weeks,6 months,2 years?Your opening statement is pretty bold,and you make a great case Would you be bold enough to give us a timeline?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->So we have a timeline,or do we?Great DW Ken. So a reader would have to figure late fall.</p>
<p> Maybe I&#8217;m grasping at straws here but you go on to say &#8220;the perfect storm may have passed by then&#8221;</p>
<p>  I&#8217;m confused are we looking at 6 weeks,6 months,2 years?Your opening statement is pretty bold,and you make a great case Would you be bold enough to give us a timeline?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-704471</link>
		<dc:creator>rtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-704471</guid>
		<description>This is like a long movie that just won&#039;t end.  How can GM spend money even faster?  They need to go out with a sensational bang.  The Volt project is just too far away.  Where is that new expensive Corvette and the Camaro at?  They&#039;ve got nothing but the Volt lined up after that and nothing lined up after the Volt.

I saw an Aveo hatch at the stoplight tonight and thought &quot;I&#039;d buy one of those in a millisecond if it was electric.&quot;  As it stands, it&#039;s just another four banger, nothing special and not worth my cash.  I&#039;ve already got a gas burner.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c1/Chevrolet_Aveo_MY08_Rear-view.JPG/800px-Chevrolet_Aveo_MY08_Rear-view.JPG 

And what was the logic behind that massive real estate grab they did?  What are they going to do with all that property when they go under?

I think Chrysler is just Cerberus&#039;s new play toy.

Ford is Mohamed Mullalys pet project and hobby.  It will be a boost to his ego if he turns that company around and increase his net worth and self worth.

That home depot guy is likely just a tool for Cerberus.  A middle man, blame guy, and fall guy.

Cerberus will profit off their purchase and investment one way or another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->This is like a long movie that just won&#8217;t end.  How can GM spend money even faster?  They need to go out with a sensational bang.  The Volt project is just too far away.  Where is that new expensive Corvette and the Camaro at?  They&#8217;ve got nothing but the Volt lined up after that and nothing lined up after the Volt.</p>
<p>I saw an Aveo hatch at the stoplight tonight and thought &#8220;I&#8217;d buy one of those in a millisecond if it was electric.&#8221;  As it stands, it&#8217;s just another four banger, nothing special and not worth my cash.  I&#8217;ve already got a gas burner.</p>
<p><a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c1/Chevrolet_Aveo_MY08_Rear-view.JPG/800px-Chevrolet_Aveo_MY08_Rear-view.JPG" rel="nofollow">http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c1/Chevrolet_Aveo_MY08_Rear-view.JPG/800px-Chevrolet_Aveo_MY08_Rear-view.JPG</a> </p>
<p>And what was the logic behind that massive real estate grab they did?  What are they going to do with all that property when they go under?</p>
<p>I think Chrysler is just Cerberus&#8217;s new play toy.</p>
<p>Ford is Mohamed Mullalys pet project and hobby.  It will be a boost to his ego if he turns that company around and increase his net worth and self worth.</p>
<p>That home depot guy is likely just a tool for Cerberus.  A middle man, blame guy, and fall guy.</p>
<p>Cerberus will profit off their purchase and investment one way or another.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkross22</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/general-motors-death-watch-193-rough-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-704281</link>
		<dc:creator>jkross22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=64921#comment-704281</guid>
		<description>Great points all around, but it boggles the mind believing a bailout/loan guarantee will &quot;rescue&quot; GM.  Yes, they have an enormous cash burn crisis, but that focuses on only that side of the equation.  The bigger issue is THEY DON&#039;T SELL ENOUGH CARS AND TRUCKS TO MAKE A PROFIT.  Their products are simply not competitive in the eyes of a great number of consumers.    

By way of comparison, if the banks had not played it fast and loose with credit over the last 7 years, we wouldn&#039;t be staring down anywhere near the mortgage and credit disaster we have now.  We would&#039;ve seen slower growth, but it would have been a smarter strategy.  

Same thing with GM.  Had they planned a bigger portfolio of competitive products, they wouldn&#039;t be in the mess they&#039;re in.  The plan to bail out a failed company is an exercise in futility.  It&#039;s just delaying the inevitable.  Seriously, what possible plan, what product mix would signal to the Feds and most importantly to consumers that GM makes what people want?

GM going tits up will have a terrible effect on the economy.  The only thing worse would be putting it on financial life support and sending even more good money chasing after bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Great points all around, but it boggles the mind believing a bailout/loan guarantee will &#8220;rescue&#8221; GM.  Yes, they have an enormous cash burn crisis, but that focuses on only that side of the equation.  The bigger issue is THEY DON&#8217;T SELL ENOUGH CARS AND TRUCKS TO MAKE A PROFIT.  Their products are simply not competitive in the eyes of a great number of consumers.    </p>
<p>By way of comparison, if the banks had not played it fast and loose with credit over the last 7 years, we wouldn&#8217;t be staring down anywhere near the mortgage and credit disaster we have now.  We would&#8217;ve seen slower growth, but it would have been a smarter strategy.  </p>
<p>Same thing with GM.  Had they planned a bigger portfolio of competitive products, they wouldn&#8217;t be in the mess they&#8217;re in.  The plan to bail out a failed company is an exercise in futility.  It&#8217;s just delaying the inevitable.  Seriously, what possible plan, what product mix would signal to the Feds and most importantly to consumers that GM makes what people want?</p>
<p>GM going tits up will have a terrible effect on the economy.  The only thing worse would be putting it on financial life support and sending even more good money chasing after bad.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 56/150 queries in 0.157 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-24 15:59:16 -->