<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford Ignores Volvo Sales Rumors. Again. Still.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ford-ignores-volvo-sales-rumors-again-still/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ford-ignores-volvo-sales-rumors-again-still/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:55:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven Lang</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ford-ignores-volvo-sales-rumors-again-still/comment-page-1/#comment-583371</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54741#comment-583371</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t delve too deeply into this, except to say that the resources going to Lincoln/Mercury should go to Volvo instead.

Volvo needs to have an exceptional family car that can compete head on with the Camry and Accord on the higher end of the market ($25k+). If they offer a better warranty, better driving ergonomics, a more distinctive look, and a feature or two that the competitors don&#039;t have, Ford would have the makings of an excellent foundation for the Volvo brand.

I still think it can work... but I have extreme doubt that it will ever happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I won&#8217;t delve too deeply into this, except to say that the resources going to Lincoln/Mercury should go to Volvo instead.</p>
<p>Volvo needs to have an exceptional family car that can compete head on with the Camry and Accord on the higher end of the market ($25k+). If they offer a better warranty, better driving ergonomics, a more distinctive look, and a feature or two that the competitors don&#8217;t have, Ford would have the makings of an excellent foundation for the Volvo brand.</p>
<p>I still think it can work&#8230; but I have extreme doubt that it will ever happen.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: windswords</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ford-ignores-volvo-sales-rumors-again-still/comment-page-1/#comment-583251</link>
		<dc:creator>windswords</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54741#comment-583251</guid>
		<description>&quot;Until that moment comes, they won’t say word one about selling Volvo, which is smart. That would diminish the brand value and hurt their current customer base. Only GM is stupid enough to do that (Hummer, Saab, Saturn, Buick, etc).&quot;

And Dumbler. They announced in a backhanded way that Chrylser might be for sale (I still think that Dieter wasn&#039;t thinking at that moment). Then they &#039;talked down&#039; the company in the media. Next thing you know all the other auto groups were tripping over themselves to say they were not interested. It would be like me trying to sell my house and saying in the sales ad how much I disliked the property. Who would want to look at it if I did that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8220;Until that moment comes, they won’t say word one about selling Volvo, which is smart. That would diminish the brand value and hurt their current customer base. Only GM is stupid enough to do that (Hummer, Saab, Saturn, Buick, etc).&#8221;</p>
<p>And Dumbler. They announced in a backhanded way that Chrylser might be for sale (I still think that Dieter wasn&#8217;t thinking at that moment). Then they &#8216;talked down&#8217; the company in the media. Next thing you know all the other auto groups were tripping over themselves to say they were not interested. It would be like me trying to sell my house and saying in the sales ad how much I disliked the property. Who would want to look at it if I did that?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Horner</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ford-ignores-volvo-sales-rumors-again-still/comment-page-1/#comment-583042</link>
		<dc:creator>John Horner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54741#comment-583042</guid>
		<description>Now is not a great time to be forced into selling a home or a car company.  Ford is almost surely trying to find a way to hold onto Volvo until better times.

But, can they make it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Now is not a great time to be forced into selling a home or a car company.  Ford is almost surely trying to find a way to hold onto Volvo until better times.</p>
<p>But, can they make it?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netrun</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ford-ignores-volvo-sales-rumors-again-still/comment-page-1/#comment-581942</link>
		<dc:creator>netrun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54741#comment-581942</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately for cash-strapped Ford, Volvo and Mazda are where they&#039;re current best designs have come from (Fusion &amp; Mazda3).  They really do need them both if they want to get out of this current mess alive.  But do they have enough resources to devote to Ford, Volvo, and Mazda products to do them all justice?

What it looks like to me is that Ford has decided that Volvo brings in a certain cost-savings, design value, and brand value that is worth X dollars annually.  The present value of that cash stream is what they are looking for someone to drop at their doorstep.

Until that moment comes, they won&#039;t say word one about selling Volvo, which is smart.  That would diminish the brand value and hurt their current customer base.  Only GM is stupid enough to do that (Hummer, Saab, Saturn, Buick, etc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Unfortunately for cash-strapped Ford, Volvo and Mazda are where they&#8217;re current best designs have come from (Fusion &amp; Mazda3).  They really do need them both if they want to get out of this current mess alive.  But do they have enough resources to devote to Ford, Volvo, and Mazda products to do them all justice?</p>
<p>What it looks like to me is that Ford has decided that Volvo brings in a certain cost-savings, design value, and brand value that is worth X dollars annually.  The present value of that cash stream is what they are looking for someone to drop at their doorstep.</p>
<p>Until that moment comes, they won&#8217;t say word one about selling Volvo, which is smart.  That would diminish the brand value and hurt their current customer base.  Only GM is stupid enough to do that (Hummer, Saab, Saturn, Buick, etc).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blowfish</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ford-ignores-volvo-sales-rumors-again-still/comment-page-1/#comment-581771</link>
		<dc:creator>blowfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=54741#comment-581771</guid>
		<description>Ford has already set up a joint venture with Changan Motors to build the Volvo S40 in China,

As long as able to support the Mother ship anything are welcome. 
Fire sale is not a fun thing, in a few yrs down the road, Ford will regret having let go a good product. But Volvo has not been running near the red line  nor firing consistently. 

Saab is even in a more sad affair. Those Swedes must starting to really hate us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Ford has already set up a joint venture with Changan Motors to build the Volvo S40 in China,</p>
<p>As long as able to support the Mother ship anything are welcome.<br />
Fire sale is not a fun thing, in a few yrs down the road, Ford will regret having let go a good product. But Volvo has not been running near the red line  nor firing consistently. </p>
<p>Saab is even in a more sad affair. Those Swedes must starting to really hate us.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 28/48 queries in 0.094 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 00:58:04 -->