<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Official Honda Insight Image</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:54:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: debushau</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1025632</link>
		<dc:creator>debushau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1025632</guid>
		<description>I thought the concept was attractive and about the only hybrid I would have seriously considered buying. And it would have been even better if offered with a nice 4 cylinder turbo engine sans hybrid motor and a nice sorted Euro-Ford type suspension. But this is just a sad, cheap Prius copy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I thought the concept was attractive and about the only hybrid I would have seriously considered buying. And it would have been even better if offered with a nice 4 cylinder turbo engine sans hybrid motor and a nice sorted Euro-Ford type suspension. But this is just a sad, cheap Prius copy.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M1EK</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1007011</link>
		<dc:creator>M1EK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1007011</guid>
		<description>The implication of &quot;so critical&quot; would be:

1. Image
99. Everything else

&quot;Quite honestly, I am completely confused as to why you think all buyers think the same way.&quot;

Once the Prius became a top-20 car, it is beyond reason to continue to claim that it&#039;s selling simply or even primarily because of image. The numbers are large enough that it&#039;s ridiculous to claim that there&#039;s such a substantial difference, now, between Prius drivers and, say, Camry drivers. There simply isn&#039;t.

While I appreciate your later comments as more rational than the original post, surely it&#039;s clear you&#039;re backing away from an unsupportable position that many of the troglodytes still hold? Throw red meat to the animals and then wash your hands kind of thing?

Again, Occam&#039;s Razor suggests that the simpler explanation is right more often than the more complicated one, absent strong evidence either way. We have a simple theory on the table that isn&#039;t contradicted: the Prius is bigger than the other hybrids, much more useful, and gets better mileage. Your theory, on the contrary, dies as soon as you look at the (old) Insight. QED.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The implication of &#8220;so critical&#8221; would be:</p>
<p>1. Image<br />
99. Everything else</p>
<p>&#8220;Quite honestly, I am completely confused as to why you think all buyers think the same way.&#8221;</p>
<p>Once the Prius became a top-20 car, it is beyond reason to continue to claim that it&#8217;s selling simply or even primarily because of image. The numbers are large enough that it&#8217;s ridiculous to claim that there&#8217;s such a substantial difference, now, between Prius drivers and, say, Camry drivers. There simply isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>While I appreciate your later comments as more rational than the original post, surely it&#8217;s clear you&#8217;re backing away from an unsupportable position that many of the troglodytes still hold? Throw red meat to the animals and then wash your hands kind of thing?</p>
<p>Again, Occam&#8217;s Razor suggests that the simpler explanation is right more often than the more complicated one, absent strong evidence either way. We have a simple theory on the table that isn&#8217;t contradicted: the Prius is bigger than the other hybrids, much more useful, and gets better mileage. Your theory, on the contrary, dies as soon as you look at the (old) Insight. QED.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Berkowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1005861</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Berkowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1005861</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;KixStart:

[M1EK disagrees with the importance of the look and the impact of image on buying a Prius...]

Justin Berkowitz: “You’re putting other people’s words in my mouth.”

Didn’t look like it from here.&lt;/em&gt;

Oh seriously, come on. I think it&#039;s really deeply unfair to respond to my claim that he&#039;s putting words in my mouth and then paraphrase what he was saying in the first place. 

And if you read his posts, it was clear that I never said much of what he was suggesting. I never said hybrid cars are a fad. I also never said that they sell exclusively because of a green halo.

&lt;em&gt;M1EK:
That’s _possible_ but if the green halo was THAT strong, the Insight would have sold far better than it did.

Much MORE likely is what I and everybody else keep telling you: there are some objective reasons for buying the Prius over the CH that have nothing to do with the green halo and that are common metrics people use for deciding between ANY two cars.&lt;/em&gt;

Yes, I agree with you. Quite honestly, I am completely confused as to why you think all buyers think the same way. 

My initial claim is that green image is a necessary component in making a hybrid car a sales success. Or, as I said in the post originally, &quot;It looks unique, and that carries the image that’s so critical in the hybrid market.&quot;

There are many necessary elements in a hybrid car being a success:
1. Function as a car
2. Price
3. MPG
4. Image

I said &quot;You have to have green image to be able to sell a hybrid successfully (i.e. on a large scale).&quot; You said &quot;No, people buy cars for many different reasons.&quot; These aren&#039;t mutually exclusive. All I am saying is that without the image component, it&#039;s much harder to sell a hybrid car to large numbers of people in the U.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>KixStart:</p>
<p>[M1EK disagrees with the importance of the look and the impact of image on buying a Prius...]</p>
<p>Justin Berkowitz: “You’re putting other people’s words in my mouth.”</p>
<p>Didn’t look like it from here.</em></p>
<p>Oh seriously, come on. I think it&#8217;s really deeply unfair to respond to my claim that he&#8217;s putting words in my mouth and then paraphrase what he was saying in the first place. </p>
<p>And if you read his posts, it was clear that I never said much of what he was suggesting. I never said hybrid cars are a fad. I also never said that they sell exclusively because of a green halo.</p>
<p><em>M1EK:<br />
That’s _possible_ but if the green halo was THAT strong, the Insight would have sold far better than it did.</p>
<p>Much MORE likely is what I and everybody else keep telling you: there are some objective reasons for buying the Prius over the CH that have nothing to do with the green halo and that are common metrics people use for deciding between ANY two cars.</em></p>
<p>Yes, I agree with you. Quite honestly, I am completely confused as to why you think all buyers think the same way. </p>
<p>My initial claim is that green image is a necessary component in making a hybrid car a sales success. Or, as I said in the post originally, &#8220;It looks unique, and that carries the image that’s so critical in the hybrid market.&#8221;</p>
<p>There are many necessary elements in a hybrid car being a success:<br />
1. Function as a car<br />
2. Price<br />
3. MPG<br />
4. Image</p>
<p>I said &#8220;You have to have green image to be able to sell a hybrid successfully (i.e. on a large scale).&#8221; You said &#8220;No, people buy cars for many different reasons.&#8221; These aren&#8217;t mutually exclusive. All I am saying is that without the image component, it&#8217;s much harder to sell a hybrid car to large numbers of people in the U.S.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Berkowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1005752</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Berkowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1005752</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;ExtraO :

“And besides, when has Occam’s razor ever applied to cars?”

With that flip remark you just guaranteed one less reader of any posting under your byline.
&lt;/em&gt;

It wasn&#039;t flip at all. I think it&#039;s a fair point to say car marketing and sales are way too complex to summarize with a single &quot;simplest theory fits&quot; method of analysis.

Still, if you choose not to read anything I write again, you&#039;ll probably find yourself in good company. If not good, then plentiful.

It does sound quite funny in the abstract: &quot;I refuse to read anything that moron writes - he doesn&#039;t even think Occam&#039;s Razor applies to cars!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>ExtraO :</p>
<p>“And besides, when has Occam’s razor ever applied to cars?”</p>
<p>With that flip remark you just guaranteed one less reader of any posting under your byline.<br />
</em></p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t flip at all. I think it&#8217;s a fair point to say car marketing and sales are way too complex to summarize with a single &#8220;simplest theory fits&#8221; method of analysis.</p>
<p>Still, if you choose not to read anything I write again, you&#8217;ll probably find yourself in good company. If not good, then plentiful.</p>
<p>It does sound quite funny in the abstract: &#8220;I refuse to read anything that moron writes &#8211; he doesn&#8217;t even think Occam&#8217;s Razor applies to cars!&#8221;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExtraO</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1005522</link>
		<dc:creator>ExtraO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1005522</guid>
		<description>&quot;And besides, when has Occam’s razor ever applied to cars?&quot;

With that flip remark you just guaranteed one less reader of any posting under your byline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8220;And besides, when has Occam’s razor ever applied to cars?&#8221;</p>
<p>With that flip remark you just guaranteed one less reader of any posting under your byline.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KixStart</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1004492</link>
		<dc:creator>KixStart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1004492</guid>
		<description>Robstar: &quot;Most Prii I see around have a single person in them.&quot;

And there&#039;s plenty of big-ass pickups in the parking lot that come in with one person aboard and otherwise rattling along empty.  They use two gallons of gas to do a trip that the Prius will do with about two to three quarts.  What was your point?

I&#039;d ride the bus, if the bus service was halfway decent.  I&#039;d bike more often if there was a reasonably safe way to do it when both the in and out might be in the dark (something of a concern here in MN).

But the fact is, if you&#039;d like to reduce oil consumption, for whatever reason, choosing a Prius or an Insight over a lot of other things is certainly a convenient way to do it and just about painless and some things just aren&#039;t very practical unless you intend to become a hermit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Robstar: &#8220;Most Prii I see around have a single person in them.&#8221;</p>
<p>And there&#8217;s plenty of big-ass pickups in the parking lot that come in with one person aboard and otherwise rattling along empty.  They use two gallons of gas to do a trip that the Prius will do with about two to three quarts.  What was your point?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d ride the bus, if the bus service was halfway decent.  I&#8217;d bike more often if there was a reasonably safe way to do it when both the in and out might be in the dark (something of a concern here in MN).</p>
<p>But the fact is, if you&#8217;d like to reduce oil consumption, for whatever reason, choosing a Prius or an Insight over a lot of other things is certainly a convenient way to do it and just about painless and some things just aren&#8217;t very practical unless you intend to become a hermit.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldowl</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1004432</link>
		<dc:creator>oldowl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1004432</guid>
		<description>Why would you buy one of these rather than a Fit--assuming that the price differential wasn&#039;t prohibitive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Why would you buy one of these rather than a Fit&#8211;assuming that the price differential wasn&#8217;t prohibitive?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M1EK</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1004402</link>
		<dc:creator>M1EK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1004402</guid>
		<description>Robstar, if you weren&#039;t otherwise going to consider a beater (I wouldn&#039;t, for reasons of reliability and emissions), then the Prius is a very sensible choice. And if everybody bought used beaters, the supply of used beaters wouldn&#039;t be able to keep up with demand, since every one of them was once a new car (my problem with many of the &quot;everybody should buy used&quot; arguments).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Robstar, if you weren&#8217;t otherwise going to consider a beater (I wouldn&#8217;t, for reasons of reliability and emissions), then the Prius is a very sensible choice. And if everybody bought used beaters, the supply of used beaters wouldn&#8217;t be able to keep up with demand, since every one of them was once a new car (my problem with many of the &#8220;everybody should buy used&#8221; arguments).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Numan</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1004312</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Numan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1004312</guid>
		<description>OK...yes, it is following the basic Prius styling theme but....... That said, I very much like it. 

It has some styling cues from the Hydrogen Clarity sedan. Wonder if it has the old CRX back hatch double-window treatment?

Considering how many recent Honda&#039;s and Acura&#039;s have not done it for me on styling, this one does work. Kudos to Honda. Now they will have this and the Fit to duke it out in the marketplace. Next year will be interesting between Detroit and others!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->OK&#8230;yes, it is following the basic Prius styling theme but&#8230;&#8230;. That said, I very much like it. </p>
<p>It has some styling cues from the Hydrogen Clarity sedan. Wonder if it has the old CRX back hatch double-window treatment?</p>
<p>Considering how many recent Honda&#8217;s and Acura&#8217;s have not done it for me on styling, this one does work. Kudos to Honda. Now they will have this and the Fit to duke it out in the marketplace. Next year will be interesting between Detroit and others!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robstar</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1003911</link>
		<dc:creator>Robstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1003911</guid>
		<description>I have no bitterness towards Prius, but I do think the people who drive them &amp; feel they are the best thing since sliced bread are kind of silly.  

Most Prii I see around have a single person in them.

Also, regarding my above post:  You can buy midsize beaters for not much more, if any, than a subcompact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I have no bitterness towards Prius, but I do think the people who drive them &amp; feel they are the best thing since sliced bread are kind of silly.  </p>
<p>Most Prii I see around have a single person in them.</p>
<p>Also, regarding my above post:  You can buy midsize beaters for not much more, if any, than a subcompact.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M1EK</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1003841</link>
		<dc:creator>M1EK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1003841</guid>
		<description>Robstar, your bitterness is showing. Subcompact is not one but TWO vehicle classes below the Prius. Neither the family nor all the stuff I&#039;ve hauled would have fit in a subcompact for the last 4.5 years we&#039;ve been able to get it to fit in the Prius.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Robstar, your bitterness is showing. Subcompact is not one but TWO vehicle classes below the Prius. Neither the family nor all the stuff I&#8217;ve hauled would have fit in a subcompact for the last 4.5 years we&#8217;ve been able to get it to fit in the Prius.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M1EK</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1003811</link>
		<dc:creator>M1EK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1003811</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It looks unique, and that carries the image that’s so critical in the hybrid market.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I do not think it was unreasonable of me to paraphrase this as &quot;green halo&quot; or &#039;fad&#039; argument. It&#039;s just a slightly nicer version of the same exact language used by GM for the last few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
<blockquote>It looks unique, and that carries the image that’s so critical in the hybrid market.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I do not think it was unreasonable of me to paraphrase this as &#8220;green halo&#8221; or &#8216;fad&#8217; argument. It&#8217;s just a slightly nicer version of the same exact language used by GM for the last few years.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robstar</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1003802</link>
		<dc:creator>Robstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1003802</guid>
		<description>M1EK&gt;  The insight wasn&#039;t available here.  I looked ALL over before giving up &amp; deciding on a sports car.  Dealers told me they didn&#039;t even know ANY OTHER dealer that they could trade with.  This was in a major market (Chicago) in 2005.

In any case, I find most Prius owners use them as posermobiles to show they are &quot;Green&quot; or &quot;save money&quot; (yep, spending $25k to save $2/gallon on gas is more efficient than buying a subcompact beater at $2k, and paying occasional maintenance costs).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->M1EK&gt;  The insight wasn&#8217;t available here.  I looked ALL over before giving up &amp; deciding on a sports car.  Dealers told me they didn&#8217;t even know ANY OTHER dealer that they could trade with.  This was in a major market (Chicago) in 2005.</p>
<p>In any case, I find most Prius owners use them as posermobiles to show they are &#8220;Green&#8221; or &#8220;save money&#8221; (yep, spending $25k to save $2/gallon on gas is more efficient than buying a subcompact beater at $2k, and paying occasional maintenance costs).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: don1967</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1003712</link>
		<dc:creator>don1967</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1003712</guid>
		<description>Hybrids never made any sense, except as must-have fashion accessories for the Church of Global Warming crowd.  Dual motors?  600-pound battery packs that need replacement every 4 years?  Please.

Now that the oil bubble has finally burst, and the pressure to &quot;do something quick&quot; is off, Honda and other companies should let these abominations die and get back to the business of developing real technologies for the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Hybrids never made any sense, except as must-have fashion accessories for the Church of Global Warming crowd.  Dual motors?  600-pound battery packs that need replacement every 4 years?  Please.</p>
<p>Now that the oil bubble has finally burst, and the pressure to &#8220;do something quick&#8221; is off, Honda and other companies should let these abominations die and get back to the business of developing real technologies for the future.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgh</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1003651</link>
		<dc:creator>jgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1003651</guid>
		<description>A better looking (and likely driving) Prius - sweet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->A better looking (and likely driving) Prius &#8211; sweet!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KixStart</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1003592</link>
		<dc:creator>KixStart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1003592</guid>
		<description>Justin Berkowitz: &lt;em&gt;&quot;I completely disagree. The Prius is not about mileage or practicality for most buyers. It’s about image. The fact that it looked unique and was easily identifiable even to non-car people was a critical part of its sales success.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

[M1EK disagrees with the importance of the look and the impact of image on buying a Prius...]

Justin Berkowitz: &lt;em&gt;&quot;You’re putting other people’s words in my mouth.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Didn&#039;t look like it from here.

I like the Prius (and will likely get one) because of the interior room, the cargo space, the general quality of the vehicle and the outstanding fuel economy (gas is cheap today but I expect it to be expensive tomorrow) and reasonable price (they start at just a bit more than a stripped Camry or Malibu).

Now, if someone could figure out how to fit all that into a shape resembling the Chevy Malibu, Ford Fusion, VW Beetle or Freightliner, I&#039;d look at it and consider buying it on the merits, just like the Prius.

And, like M1EK, the people that I know who bought one bought the car on its totally practical merits.  &quot;I can fit all this crap into it and still get 46mpg?  Sold.&quot;  Well...  &quot;And it&#039;s a Toyota?  Sold.&quot;

Toyota reported back in &#039;02 or so that they were able to sell the car for more than unit cost.  Toyota is able to sell the Yaris, which is not a bad little car at all, for as little as $10,500. It is not at all unrealistic to think they can profitably sell the Prius at $22,000... unless you intend to assert that Toyota is selling the Yaris and all its other small cars at a loss.

If Toyota can do it... so can Honda.  So could GM, for the matter of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Justin Berkowitz: <em>&#8220;I completely disagree. The Prius is not about mileage or practicality for most buyers. It’s about image. The fact that it looked unique and was easily identifiable even to non-car people was a critical part of its sales success.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>[M1EK disagrees with the importance of the look and the impact of image on buying a Prius...]</p>
<p>Justin Berkowitz: <em>&#8220;You’re putting other people’s words in my mouth.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t look like it from here.</p>
<p>I like the Prius (and will likely get one) because of the interior room, the cargo space, the general quality of the vehicle and the outstanding fuel economy (gas is cheap today but I expect it to be expensive tomorrow) and reasonable price (they start at just a bit more than a stripped Camry or Malibu).</p>
<p>Now, if someone could figure out how to fit all that into a shape resembling the Chevy Malibu, Ford Fusion, VW Beetle or Freightliner, I&#8217;d look at it and consider buying it on the merits, just like the Prius.</p>
<p>And, like M1EK, the people that I know who bought one bought the car on its totally practical merits.  &#8220;I can fit all this crap into it and still get 46mpg?  Sold.&#8221;  Well&#8230;  &#8220;And it&#8217;s a Toyota?  Sold.&#8221;</p>
<p>Toyota reported back in &#8216;02 or so that they were able to sell the car for more than unit cost.  Toyota is able to sell the Yaris, which is not a bad little car at all, for as little as $10,500. It is not at all unrealistic to think they can profitably sell the Prius at $22,000&#8230; unless you intend to assert that Toyota is selling the Yaris and all its other small cars at a loss.</p>
<p>If Toyota can do it&#8230; so can Honda.  So could GM, for the matter of that.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpcavanaugh</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1003551</link>
		<dc:creator>jpcavanaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1003551</guid>
		<description>B-Rad - I must disagree.  The Astro was actually GM&#039;s failed attempt at a minivan.  I mean the first one.  After Chrysler&#039;s was out for a couple of years and it was plainly a hit, The General decided (as usual) that Chrysler had gotten it wrong.  &quot;What they really want is a trucky rear wheel drive van, but smaller.&quot;  Acctually, for the heart of the market where all the sales happen, Chrysler was right and GM was wrong (as has been its oft repeated pattern.)  My recall (might be wrong) is that the Astro came in 3d in a 3 way sales race with the Voyager/Caravan and the Aerostar.  But, by dumb luck and the passage of enough time (and some incremental improvements) GM found enough of a market for its unique vehicle.  I think the older it got, the better it sold.  Personally, I never saw the point.  If you want bulk, crummy gas mileage, lots of room, why not just get a real van.  Same money, more truck.  I had many happy years with my Ford Club Wagon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->B-Rad &#8211; I must disagree.  The Astro was actually GM&#8217;s failed attempt at a minivan.  I mean the first one.  After Chrysler&#8217;s was out for a couple of years and it was plainly a hit, The General decided (as usual) that Chrysler had gotten it wrong.  &#8220;What they really want is a trucky rear wheel drive van, but smaller.&#8221;  Acctually, for the heart of the market where all the sales happen, Chrysler was right and GM was wrong (as has been its oft repeated pattern.)  My recall (might be wrong) is that the Astro came in 3d in a 3 way sales race with the Voyager/Caravan and the Aerostar.  But, by dumb luck and the passage of enough time (and some incremental improvements) GM found enough of a market for its unique vehicle.  I think the older it got, the better it sold.  Personally, I never saw the point.  If you want bulk, crummy gas mileage, lots of room, why not just get a real van.  Same money, more truck.  I had many happy years with my Ford Club Wagon.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SupaMan</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1003531</link>
		<dc:creator>SupaMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1003531</guid>
		<description>From what I&#039;ve heard (or read), Honda can manage selling the Insight for less that $20g because it is simply and Civic hybrid with a more aerodynamic body. A lot of the interior is parts-bin stuff that Honda can manufacture at a bargain price point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->From what I&#8217;ve heard (or read), Honda can manage selling the Insight for less that $20g because it is simply and Civic hybrid with a more aerodynamic body. A lot of the interior is parts-bin stuff that Honda can manufacture at a bargain price point.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psarhjinian</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1003521</link>
		<dc:creator>psarhjinian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1003521</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Civic hybrid drives way better then Prius. Which is probably not an asset in this market segment.&lt;/em&gt;

Yup.  Honda, like GM, flubbed the demographics.  By and large, hybrid buyers don&#039;t care about handling (Civic), power (Accord) or towing capacity (GMT900).  Classic &quot;we know better than the customers&quot; syndrome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Civic hybrid drives way better then Prius. Which is probably not an asset in this market segment.</em></p>
<p>Yup.  Honda, like GM, flubbed the demographics.  By and large, hybrid buyers don&#8217;t care about handling (Civic), power (Accord) or towing capacity (GMT900).  Classic &#8220;we know better than the customers&#8221; syndrome.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olivehead</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1003472</link>
		<dc:creator>olivehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1003472</guid>
		<description>i think the bottom line is that this is the first hybrid since prius debuted that has any chance, and probably will, start selling in significant numbers b/c it is a &quot;unique&quot; offering in that it&#039;s a honda hybrid not based on an existing style already being offered (e.g. accord or civic) that&#039;s not particularly &quot;odd-looking&quot; (e.g. the original insight).  i expect it&#039;s sales will over a couple years rival those of the prius.

looking at the new insight brought to mind the short-lived russian space shuttle program, called &quot;buran&quot; if i&#039;m not mistaken.  it looked an awful lot like the u.s. shuttle orbiter, to the point that some thought they&#039;d stolen the plans and built their own. actually, our shuttle was made about as well as it could have been given the existing technology at the time it was designed.  therefore, anything that would function on a par with it in terms of aerodynamics, dimensions, etc, would probably have to look an awful lot like it did, as was the case with the russian shuttle.  maybe toyota designed a hybrid that could function just about as well as could be made with the existing technology, and so any competitor with any hopes of success would happen to design something coincidentally that looked remarkably similar.  no other hybrids have had any(where near) the success of prius.

anyway, just my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->i think the bottom line is that this is the first hybrid since prius debuted that has any chance, and probably will, start selling in significant numbers b/c it is a &#8220;unique&#8221; offering in that it&#8217;s a honda hybrid not based on an existing style already being offered (e.g. accord or civic) that&#8217;s not particularly &#8220;odd-looking&#8221; (e.g. the original insight).  i expect it&#8217;s sales will over a couple years rival those of the prius.</p>
<p>looking at the new insight brought to mind the short-lived russian space shuttle program, called &#8220;buran&#8221; if i&#8217;m not mistaken.  it looked an awful lot like the u.s. shuttle orbiter, to the point that some thought they&#8217;d stolen the plans and built their own. actually, our shuttle was made about as well as it could have been given the existing technology at the time it was designed.  therefore, anything that would function on a par with it in terms of aerodynamics, dimensions, etc, would probably have to look an awful lot like it did, as was the case with the russian shuttle.  maybe toyota designed a hybrid that could function just about as well as could be made with the existing technology, and so any competitor with any hopes of success would happen to design something coincidentally that looked remarkably similar.  no other hybrids have had any(where near) the success of prius.</p>
<p>anyway, just my 2 cents.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B-Rad</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1003441</link>
		<dc:creator>B-Rad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1003441</guid>
		<description>argentia:

Since my family still owns a &#039;92 Astro and I have often been at the wheel, I want to make it clear that the Astro/Safari is NOT a minivan but a van.  There is a very large difference, apart from the FWD/RWD aspect.  The Astro is basically a truck while minivans are cars.  

I&#039;ve had to explain this to many, many guys who accused me of piloting a minivan.  But when they saw what I could do with it (RWD manuevering/configuring the rear bench seats/loading massive amounts of cargo) the doubt immediately disappears.  The Astro is an awesome vehicle, at least until you visit the pump.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->argentia:</p>
<p>Since my family still owns a &#8216;92 Astro and I have often been at the wheel, I want to make it clear that the Astro/Safari is NOT a minivan but a van.  There is a very large difference, apart from the FWD/RWD aspect.  The Astro is basically a truck while minivans are cars.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had to explain this to many, many guys who accused me of piloting a minivan.  But when they saw what I could do with it (RWD manuevering/configuring the rear bench seats/loading massive amounts of cargo) the doubt immediately disappears.  The Astro is an awesome vehicle, at least until you visit the pump.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: galaxygreymx5</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1003402</link>
		<dc:creator>galaxygreymx5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1003402</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;autonut: It wasn’t the engine that sucked the most in original Insight. It was the heft and disbalance of car. It was a hefty pig and handled as such. The weakling of a motor was well compensated by 5 speed tranny: you could rev the daylights out of it. When you swapped engine, did you dropped batteries and electric motor or were still dragging that heft with you at higher RPM?&lt;/em&gt;

Huh?! The original Insight weighed less than 1850 lbs.  The electric motor was thin and light and the battery pack was well under 100lbs.  

How those numbers could translate to &quot;hefty pig&quot; mystifies me.  The car certainly wasn&#039;t fast, but it had nothing to do with weight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>autonut: It wasn’t the engine that sucked the most in original Insight. It was the heft and disbalance of car. It was a hefty pig and handled as such. The weakling of a motor was well compensated by 5 speed tranny: you could rev the daylights out of it. When you swapped engine, did you dropped batteries and electric motor or were still dragging that heft with you at higher RPM?</em></p>
<p>Huh?! The original Insight weighed less than 1850 lbs.  The electric motor was thin and light and the battery pack was well under 100lbs.  </p>
<p>How those numbers could translate to &#8220;hefty pig&#8221; mystifies me.  The car certainly wasn&#8217;t fast, but it had nothing to do with weight.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Berkowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1003391</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Berkowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1003391</guid>
		<description>@M1EK:

You&#039;re putting other people&#039;s words in my mouth. If you re-read the post and my replies in this thread, you&#039;ll find that I never said many of the things you disagree with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@M1EK:</p>
<p>You&#8217;re putting other people&#8217;s words in my mouth. If you re-read the post and my replies in this thread, you&#8217;ll find that I never said many of the things you disagree with.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ca36gtp</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1003381</link>
		<dc:creator>ca36gtp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1003381</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a Prius with a Honda badge and a Civic interior, I&#039;d hardly call that &quot;unique&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->It&#8217;s a Prius with a Honda badge and a Civic interior, I&#8217;d hardly call that &#8220;unique&#8221;.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M1EK</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/first-official-honda-insight-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1003342</link>
		<dc:creator>M1EK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=174242#comment-1003342</guid>
		<description>Occam&#039;s Razor applies to a case like this where you&#039;re claiming that a car which is firmly ensconced in the top 20, outselling Buick and several other marquees, is still just a &#039;fad&#039; which sells because of its green halo.

That&#039;s _possible_ but if the green halo was THAT strong, the Insight would have sold far better than it did.

Much MORE likely is what I and everybody else keep telling you: there are some objective reasons for buying the Prius over the CH that have nothing to do with the green halo and that are common metrics people use for deciding between ANY two cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Occam&#8217;s Razor applies to a case like this where you&#8217;re claiming that a car which is firmly ensconced in the top 20, outselling Buick and several other marquees, is still just a &#8216;fad&#8217; which sells because of its green halo.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s _possible_ but if the green halo was THAT strong, the Insight would have sold far better than it did.</p>
<p>Much MORE likely is what I and everybody else keep telling you: there are some objective reasons for buying the Prius over the CH that have nothing to do with the green halo and that are common metrics people use for deciding between ANY two cars.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 45/142 queries in 0.125 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 22:01:20 -->