<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ferrari Stands On Principle: No Four-Doors, No V10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ferrari-stands-on-principle-no-four-doors-no-v10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ferrari-stands-on-principle-no-four-doors-no-v10/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:29:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JEC</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ferrari-stands-on-principle-no-four-doors-no-v10/comment-page-1/#comment-822871</link>
		<dc:creator>JEC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 15:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=96282#comment-822871</guid>
		<description>Funny, Ferrari has gone on record saying they *might* develop hybrid technology and make some attempt to go &quot;green&quot; (bahahaha, sorry, putting Ferrari and green in the same sentence cracks me up everytime).

Reject one fad to follow another?

Perhaps they will pull a fast one like MB and release a coupe that has four doors. Erm, I mean a four door they claim is a coupe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Funny, Ferrari has gone on record saying they *might* develop hybrid technology and make some attempt to go &#8220;green&#8221; (bahahaha, sorry, putting Ferrari and green in the same sentence cracks me up everytime).</p>
<p>Reject one fad to follow another?</p>
<p>Perhaps they will pull a fast one like MB and release a coupe that has four doors. Erm, I mean a four door they claim is a coupe.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jybt</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ferrari-stands-on-principle-no-four-doors-no-v10/comment-page-1/#comment-822301</link>
		<dc:creator>jybt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 22:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=96282#comment-822301</guid>
		<description>Just because people don&#039;t care about mpg doesn&#039;t mean you can make a car that performs worse than a Z06 and gets &lt;strong&gt;8 mpg less&lt;/strong&gt;.

Seriously, no direct injection in a $200,000 car?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Just because people don&#8217;t care about mpg doesn&#8217;t mean you can make a car that performs worse than a Z06 and gets <strong>8 mpg less</strong>.</p>
<p>Seriously, no direct injection in a $200,000 car?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DearS</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ferrari-stands-on-principle-no-four-doors-no-v10/comment-page-1/#comment-822241</link>
		<dc:creator>DearS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 22:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=96282#comment-822241</guid>
		<description>I really like the M5, M3 and RS4 sedans. Ferrari is late to the party, hence no partying for them. The 612 is already as heavy as an RS4 and near M5, yet about as powerful as the five. Then we have the RS6, E63, C63, and CTS-V. We have a lot of options. I like for Ferrari to build really good cars. Still the California, 599, and 612? When the hell did they put performance first?  I say Ferrari outta build a 4 door or at least lower prices, but again who needs Ferrari? I like them to continue to build better cars I guess,  that way the next wave of lower priced sporty cars can raise the bar also. Although they hardly need Ferrari either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I really like the M5, M3 and RS4 sedans. Ferrari is late to the party, hence no partying for them. The 612 is already as heavy as an RS4 and near M5, yet about as powerful as the five. Then we have the RS6, E63, C63, and CTS-V. We have a lot of options. I like for Ferrari to build really good cars. Still the California, 599, and 612? When the hell did they put performance first?  I say Ferrari outta build a 4 door or at least lower prices, but again who needs Ferrari? I like them to continue to build better cars I guess,  that way the next wave of lower priced sporty cars can raise the bar also. Although they hardly need Ferrari either.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brianmack</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ferrari-stands-on-principle-no-four-doors-no-v10/comment-page-1/#comment-822032</link>
		<dc:creator>brianmack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=96282#comment-822032</guid>
		<description>F1&#039;s conversion from V10 power to V8 power started during the 2006 season IIRC.  Some teams continuted to run V10&#039;s in 2006 (Ferrari were among the V8 runners) but the V8&#039;s were manditory for 2007 and beyond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->F1&#8217;s conversion from V10 power to V8 power started during the 2006 season IIRC.  Some teams continuted to run V10&#8217;s in 2006 (Ferrari were among the V8 runners) but the V8&#8217;s were manditory for 2007 and beyond.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Berkowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ferrari-stands-on-principle-no-four-doors-no-v10/comment-page-1/#comment-821851</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Berkowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=96282#comment-821851</guid>
		<description>Correct. F1 is now 2.4 liter V8 engines. But the switch over from the 3.0 V10 was fairly recent. I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Correct. F1 is now 2.4 liter V8 engines. But the switch over from the 3.0 V10 was fairly recent. I think.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ferrarimanf355</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ferrari-stands-on-principle-no-four-doors-no-v10/comment-page-1/#comment-821812</link>
		<dc:creator>ferrarimanf355</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=96282#comment-821812</guid>
		<description>J.on, I could have sworn that F1 uses V8 motors now. Maybe the V10 they&#039;re referring to is one of the older designs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->J.on, I could have sworn that F1 uses V8 motors now. Maybe the V10 they&#8217;re referring to is one of the older designs?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.on</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ferrari-stands-on-principle-no-four-doors-no-v10/comment-page-1/#comment-821761</link>
		<dc:creator>J.on</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=96282#comment-821761</guid>
		<description>tony-e30, the Ferrari F1 engine is a V10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->tony-e30, the Ferrari F1 engine is a V10.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony-e30</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ferrari-stands-on-principle-no-four-doors-no-v10/comment-page-1/#comment-821741</link>
		<dc:creator>tony-e30</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=96282#comment-821741</guid>
		<description>What Ferrari V10 racing engine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->What Ferrari V10 racing engine?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ferrarimanf355</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ferrari-stands-on-principle-no-four-doors-no-v10/comment-page-1/#comment-821692</link>
		<dc:creator>ferrarimanf355</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=96282#comment-821692</guid>
		<description>Considering my username, I do applaud Ferrari for sticking to their guns. Then again, didn&#039;t they toss around the idea for a Ferrari hybrid? ::shudders::

And yes, the Maserati Quattroporte is beautiful. The current Maserati lineup, with the Quattroporte and the GranTurismo, are the two greatest things the Italian auto industry has going for it. The influence from Ferrari and Alfa Romeo since Maserati was added to the Fiat empire is obvious...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Considering my username, I do applaud Ferrari for sticking to their guns. Then again, didn&#8217;t they toss around the idea for a Ferrari hybrid? ::shudders::</p>
<p>And yes, the Maserati Quattroporte is beautiful. The current Maserati lineup, with the Quattroporte and the GranTurismo, are the two greatest things the Italian auto industry has going for it. The influence from Ferrari and Alfa Romeo since Maserati was added to the Fiat empire is obvious&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SupaMan</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ferrari-stands-on-principle-no-four-doors-no-v10/comment-page-1/#comment-821421</link>
		<dc:creator>SupaMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=96282#comment-821421</guid>
		<description>Kudos to Ferrari....the Panamera and Rapide were ok to begin with (didn&#039;t count the CLS or the upcoming 8 series as contenders anyway), but the Lamborghini seems like overkill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Kudos to Ferrari&#8230;.the Panamera and Rapide were ok to begin with (didn&#8217;t count the CLS or the upcoming 8 series as contenders anyway), but the Lamborghini seems like overkill.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cicero</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ferrari-stands-on-principle-no-four-doors-no-v10/comment-page-1/#comment-821391</link>
		<dc:creator>Cicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=96282#comment-821391</guid>
		<description>Imagine if GM had bought Ferrari back when GM was buying anything that rolled.  Today we&#039;d have two Ferrari sedans -- one Epsilon, one Sigma, a CUV, a mid-size SUV (hybrid), a fancy pickup truck, a Soltice-based roadster, a Korean-built econobox, and a line of hearses.  Oh, and we&#039;d be waiting for the plug-in Ferrari Volte, due any day now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Imagine if GM had bought Ferrari back when GM was buying anything that rolled.  Today we&#8217;d have two Ferrari sedans &#8212; one Epsilon, one Sigma, a CUV, a mid-size SUV (hybrid), a fancy pickup truck, a Soltice-based roadster, a Korean-built econobox, and a line of hearses.  Oh, and we&#8217;d be waiting for the plug-in Ferrari Volte, due any day now.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DearS</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ferrari-stands-on-principle-no-four-doors-no-v10/comment-page-1/#comment-821322</link>
		<dc:creator>DearS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=96282#comment-821322</guid>
		<description>Of course they could build a V12 Maserati 4-door and call it a day. Although the current Maserati 4-door is a great car to work with. No need to double the price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Of course they could build a V12 Maserati 4-door and call it a day. Although the current Maserati 4-door is a great car to work with. No need to double the price.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Niedermeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ferrari-stands-on-principle-no-four-doors-no-v10/comment-page-1/#comment-821112</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Niedermeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=96282#comment-821112</guid>
		<description>Ironically, Ferrari (almost) started the whole thing with their stunningly beautiful four-door Pinin http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2187/2291933431_9d8d62d43e.jpg?v=0 which they came very close to building in the late eighties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Ironically, Ferrari (almost) started the whole thing with their stunningly beautiful four-door Pinin <a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2187/2291933431_9d8d62d43e.jpg?v=0" rel="nofollow">http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2187/2291933431_9d8d62d43e.jpg?v=0</a> which they came very close to building in the late eighties.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 40/90 queries in 0.123 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 05:31:16 -->