<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Editorial: Between the Lines: GM Does Not Welcome Its New Governmental Overlords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bobcat74</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-2/#comment-1492020</link>
		<dc:creator>bobcat74</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1492020</guid>
		<description>some good points made in the comments so far. 

however, let us not forget the most overlooked reason, why gm has no right to complain about government intervention: LOBBYISTS.

apparently it&#039;s ok for gm to throw billions of dollars at high priced lobbyists over the years to bribe lawmakers to cater laws to their company and industry, so that they can yield higher profits at the expense of smaller companies and more importantly the environment.  yet when the government throws billions at them to save their unethical behinds, suddenly the government doesn&#039;t have a say?

so according to gm, it&#039;s ok for government to intervene only when it involves &quot;behind-the-scenes&quot; deceit, and not ok when it involves &quot;in-the-public-eye&quot;, good will aid?

we&#039;ve had the technology and know-how to build efficient electrical cars at normal cost for nearly 75 years, but there is more money to be made producing vehicles the way they are produced now.  ESPECIALLY when you throw in the impact of the oil industry and their lobbyists.  who cares about the environment and out descendants future, right??

don&#039;t mean to single out gm and the entire auto industy, as this obviously occurs in all industries.  financial and synthetic chemical / pharmaceutical industries are possibly the worst.  

and people wonder why democrats want regulation...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->some good points made in the comments so far. </p>
<p>however, let us not forget the most overlooked reason, why gm has no right to complain about government intervention: LOBBYISTS.</p>
<p>apparently it&#8217;s ok for gm to throw billions of dollars at high priced lobbyists over the years to bribe lawmakers to cater laws to their company and industry, so that they can yield higher profits at the expense of smaller companies and more importantly the environment.  yet when the government throws billions at them to save their unethical behinds, suddenly the government doesn&#8217;t have a say?</p>
<p>so according to gm, it&#8217;s ok for government to intervene only when it involves &#8220;behind-the-scenes&#8221; deceit, and not ok when it involves &#8220;in-the-public-eye&#8221;, good will aid?</p>
<p>we&#8217;ve had the technology and know-how to build efficient electrical cars at normal cost for nearly 75 years, but there is more money to be made producing vehicles the way they are produced now.  ESPECIALLY when you throw in the impact of the oil industry and their lobbyists.  who cares about the environment and out descendants future, right??</p>
<p>don&#8217;t mean to single out gm and the entire auto industy, as this obviously occurs in all industries.  financial and synthetic chemical / pharmaceutical industries are possibly the worst.  </p>
<p>and people wonder why democrats want regulation&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wsn</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-2/#comment-1483981</link>
		<dc:creator>wsn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483981</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;#   cardeveloper :
May 14th, 2009 at 9:32 pm

Rastus,

GM sales are down
Chrysler sales are down
Ford sales are down
So are Toyota, Honda, etc etc, etc
The entire industry’s sales are down, way down. All the companies are losing money, big time money. Kill the entire industry?&lt;/i&gt;

-------------------------------------

Only kill the harmful ones, i.e. the parasites living on taxpayers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><i>#   cardeveloper :<br />
May 14th, 2009 at 9:32 pm</p>
<p>Rastus,</p>
<p>GM sales are down<br />
Chrysler sales are down<br />
Ford sales are down<br />
So are Toyota, Honda, etc etc, etc<br />
The entire industry’s sales are down, way down. All the companies are losing money, big time money. Kill the entire industry?</i></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Only kill the harmful ones, i.e. the parasites living on taxpayers.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AKM</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-2/#comment-1483921</link>
		<dc:creator>AKM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483921</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Boo-freaking-hoo. You gotta serve somebody, as the poet once said, and taking bailout bucks makes the government master of your fate. It’s one thing to ask the government to be a lender of last resort, but it’s quite another to ask said lender to ignore its fiduciary responsiblity. Y’know, more than it already has.&lt;/em&gt;

Best summary of the situation I&#039;ve ever read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Boo-freaking-hoo. You gotta serve somebody, as the poet once said, and taking bailout bucks makes the government master of your fate. It’s one thing to ask the government to be a lender of last resort, but it’s quite another to ask said lender to ignore its fiduciary responsiblity. Y’know, more than it already has.</em></p>
<p>Best summary of the situation I&#8217;ve ever read.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pch101</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-2/#comment-1483836</link>
		<dc:creator>Pch101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483836</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;what am I missing here?&lt;/em&gt;

If the companies are going to be restructured and sold, they need these things:

-Working capital
-Some, although not all, of the production facilities
-Some, although not all, of the dealer network
-As few pre-existing liabilities as possible
-A workforce to make the stuff they want to sell

You&#039;ll notice that all of those things are underway. 

I know that people here love to hate the union, and that&#039;s your right.  But if somebody is going to take over these companies, they are going to want to build stuff.  Which makes having all of the workers bail out not a positive.

The new owner of Chrysler is getting better terms and an ability to start making product, which is what a new owner would want.  For the sake of expediency, starting without the blue collar workforce makes no sense because rehiring from zero would itself take months or years of effort and expense, while preventing the production needed to make the business work.

When Toyota began running the NUMMI plant, it kept 85% of the workforce, even though it was one of the worst plants in the GM system with a nasty relationship with the UAW.  Toyota renegotiated the terms, but didn&#039;t clear out most of the workforce, because they needed to keep workers if they were going to build cars.  They did, and it became of one the best plants under new management.

Your focus is on the wrong place.  You need to think of what a buyer would want.  They want equipment and people ready to work, not massive debt and labor disputes.  It may be great symbolism for you, but it would be highly impractical for putting a deal together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>what am I missing here?</em></p>
<p>If the companies are going to be restructured and sold, they need these things:</p>
<p>-Working capital<br />
-Some, although not all, of the production facilities<br />
-Some, although not all, of the dealer network<br />
-As few pre-existing liabilities as possible<br />
-A workforce to make the stuff they want to sell</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll notice that all of those things are underway. </p>
<p>I know that people here love to hate the union, and that&#8217;s your right.  But if somebody is going to take over these companies, they are going to want to build stuff.  Which makes having all of the workers bail out not a positive.</p>
<p>The new owner of Chrysler is getting better terms and an ability to start making product, which is what a new owner would want.  For the sake of expediency, starting without the blue collar workforce makes no sense because rehiring from zero would itself take months or years of effort and expense, while preventing the production needed to make the business work.</p>
<p>When Toyota began running the NUMMI plant, it kept 85% of the workforce, even though it was one of the worst plants in the GM system with a nasty relationship with the UAW.  Toyota renegotiated the terms, but didn&#8217;t clear out most of the workforce, because they needed to keep workers if they were going to build cars.  They did, and it became of one the best plants under new management.</p>
<p>Your focus is on the wrong place.  You need to think of what a buyer would want.  They want equipment and people ready to work, not massive debt and labor disputes.  It may be great symbolism for you, but it would be highly impractical for putting a deal together.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nocaster</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-2/#comment-1483786</link>
		<dc:creator>nocaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 13:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483786</guid>
		<description>Sounds like we have a new government agency...The Department of General Motors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Sounds like we have a new government agency&#8230;The Department of General Motors.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpcavanaugh</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-2/#comment-1483760</link>
		<dc:creator>jpcavanaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 10:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483760</guid>
		<description>What I really love is GM management&#039;s repeated use of the phrase &quot;our company.&quot;  One more example of the arrogance of these people.  The company belongs (for now) to the shareholders who have seen all of their value flushed down the toilet.  Management thinks that GM is there for the benefit of management.  There is a culture of entitlement there, a culture that wants to keep steering the ship even after it has been bashed onto the rocks.  Amazing how they still think they know better than everyone else and remain entitled to a place at the buffet even after the food is gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->What I really love is GM management&#8217;s repeated use of the phrase &#8220;our company.&#8221;  One more example of the arrogance of these people.  The company belongs (for now) to the shareholders who have seen all of their value flushed down the toilet.  Management thinks that GM is there for the benefit of management.  There is a culture of entitlement there, a culture that wants to keep steering the ship even after it has been bashed onto the rocks.  Amazing how they still think they know better than everyone else and remain entitled to a place at the buffet even after the food is gone.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertel Schmitt</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-2/#comment-1483752</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertel Schmitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 08:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483752</guid>
		<description>As John Horner said: Don&#039;t read too much into a Risk Factor statement. Lawyers are paid to come up with anything awful that might happen, including meteor strike, so that if it happens, you can say: &quot;We told you so.&quot;  Its the financial equivalent of &quot;Content is hot and may scald your mouth.&quot;

When I saw the first Risk Factor statements in a prospectus for one of my companies, I was appalled and wanted to fold. Both financial guys and lawyers said: &quot;Calm down. Nobody reads that stuff.&quot;  

And nobody did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->As John Horner said: Don&#8217;t read too much into a Risk Factor statement. Lawyers are paid to come up with anything awful that might happen, including meteor strike, so that if it happens, you can say: &#8220;We told you so.&#8221;  Its the financial equivalent of &#8220;Content is hot and may scald your mouth.&#8221;</p>
<p>When I saw the first Risk Factor statements in a prospectus for one of my companies, I was appalled and wanted to fold. Both financial guys and lawyers said: &#8220;Calm down. Nobody reads that stuff.&#8221;  </p>
<p>And nobody did.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dynamic88</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-2/#comment-1483751</link>
		<dc:creator>Dynamic88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 08:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483751</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;It’s a realistic worry that the government will force GM into making decisions that make no sense business-wise. &lt;/strong&gt;

You mean the govt. is going to make GM buy up failing Eurpean automakers?  Or the govt. is going to make GM slash and burn it&#039;s suppliers so they get lower quality parts?  The govt. is going to tell GM to make their small cars as crappy as possible so that most people will prefer the competition?  

Why worry about the govt. decisions?   Is it even theoretically possible that the govt. men are more incompetent than GM execs?   No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><strong>It’s a realistic worry that the government will force GM into making decisions that make no sense business-wise. </strong></p>
<p>You mean the govt. is going to make GM buy up failing Eurpean automakers?  Or the govt. is going to make GM slash and burn it&#8217;s suppliers so they get lower quality parts?  The govt. is going to tell GM to make their small cars as crappy as possible so that most people will prefer the competition?  </p>
<p>Why worry about the govt. decisions?   Is it even theoretically possible that the govt. men are more incompetent than GM execs?   No.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarnotCycle</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-1/#comment-1483745</link>
		<dc:creator>CarnotCycle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 06:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483745</guid>
		<description>@John Horner

&lt;i&gt;Pure delusional speculation. So far we have seen GM announce plans to import more vehicles, many of those from China (a first). GM and Chrysler are closing factories and dealerships at a record pace, hardly the sort of thing Government Owned Failing Businesses are exactly known for. UAW members and non-UAW members are getting shown the door at an ever faster rate. How do you square the actual news with these fantasies about what you are just gosh darn certain the Democrats are going to do? &lt;/i&gt;

Delusional speculation? Look at Chrysler. The government essentially spent billions of tax-payer dollars in order to basically give a corporate version of Terry Schiavo to Fiat. Why? To preserve the collective bargaining agreement currently in place. Slashing workers? I don&#039;t think anyone on the UAW has been &quot;laid off&quot; in the context I understand that phrase. The more accurate term is &quot;buyout&quot; in my dialect. If you&#039;re not in the union, well, now that&#039;s a layoff.

Frankly, importing cars under GM&#039;s nameplates from China kinda proves the point that GM can&#039;t make a econobox worth selling in this country with its current labor environment. I also find it insulting that my tax dollars are being used to subsidize a corporate shell to import Chinese cars. What&#039;s that subsidy work out to be if GM imports a million rides from Maoistan? 

The government would rather have that arrangement - importing Chinese rides with UAW collective bargaining in place (like Chrysler) - rather than blow the union up in Chapter 11 and maybe see American cars (cars, not trucks) being made profitably by GM in THIS country? Sounds like Democrats to me, what am I missing here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@John Horner</p>
<p><i>Pure delusional speculation. So far we have seen GM announce plans to import more vehicles, many of those from China (a first). GM and Chrysler are closing factories and dealerships at a record pace, hardly the sort of thing Government Owned Failing Businesses are exactly known for. UAW members and non-UAW members are getting shown the door at an ever faster rate. How do you square the actual news with these fantasies about what you are just gosh darn certain the Democrats are going to do? </i></p>
<p>Delusional speculation? Look at Chrysler. The government essentially spent billions of tax-payer dollars in order to basically give a corporate version of Terry Schiavo to Fiat. Why? To preserve the collective bargaining agreement currently in place. Slashing workers? I don&#8217;t think anyone on the UAW has been &#8220;laid off&#8221; in the context I understand that phrase. The more accurate term is &#8220;buyout&#8221; in my dialect. If you&#8217;re not in the union, well, now that&#8217;s a layoff.</p>
<p>Frankly, importing cars under GM&#8217;s nameplates from China kinda proves the point that GM can&#8217;t make a econobox worth selling in this country with its current labor environment. I also find it insulting that my tax dollars are being used to subsidize a corporate shell to import Chinese cars. What&#8217;s that subsidy work out to be if GM imports a million rides from Maoistan? </p>
<p>The government would rather have that arrangement &#8211; importing Chinese rides with UAW collective bargaining in place (like Chrysler) &#8211; rather than blow the union up in Chapter 11 and maybe see American cars (cars, not trucks) being made profitably by GM in THIS country? Sounds like Democrats to me, what am I missing here?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GS650G</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-1/#comment-1483743</link>
		<dc:creator>GS650G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 06:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483743</guid>
		<description>The government is trying hard to paint the current economy as recovering but it&#039;s not working. Later  this year another crash will occur, and that is going to be a big one.

15% unemployment, Dow below 6000, and car sales non-existent.

I see used cars for sale everywhere, no one is buying anything they don&#039;t need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The government is trying hard to paint the current economy as recovering but it&#8217;s not working. Later  this year another crash will occur, and that is going to be a big one.</p>
<p>15% unemployment, Dow below 6000, and car sales non-existent.</p>
<p>I see used cars for sale everywhere, no one is buying anything they don&#8217;t need.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: "scarey"</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-1/#comment-1483742</link>
		<dc:creator>"scarey"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 05:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483742</guid>
		<description>The 3 biggest lies:
1) I&#039;m from the government. I&#039;m here to help you.
2) The check is in the mail.
3) I promise I won&#039;t $#@* in your mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The 3 biggest lies:<br />
1) I&#8217;m from the government. I&#8217;m here to help you.<br />
2) The check is in the mail.<br />
3) I promise I won&#8217;t $#@* in your mouth.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seanx37</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-1/#comment-1483740</link>
		<dc:creator>seanx37</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 05:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483740</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Funny how last year’s oil spike is never mentioned, even in passing, about the current financial crisis.&quot;
&lt;/strong&gt;
Wait until the next spike, due any minute, and see what happens to sales then. 

But, if GM is not happy with the government control, just pay back what they have &quot;borrowed&quot; to the government and go off on their own. Oh wait, they can&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><strong>&#8220;Funny how last year’s oil spike is never mentioned, even in passing, about the current financial crisis.&#8221;<br />
</strong><br />
Wait until the next spike, due any minute, and see what happens to sales then. </p>
<p>But, if GM is not happy with the government control, just pay back what they have &#8220;borrowed&#8221; to the government and go off on their own. Oh wait, they can&#8217;t.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GS650G</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-1/#comment-1483738</link>
		<dc:creator>GS650G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 05:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483738</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Her best boy Alan Greenspan didn’t exactly cover himself in glory.&lt;/em&gt;

It&#039;s hard to believe he was once considered a follower of Rand. His last years as Fed Chairman were part of the housing bubble.

&lt;em&gt;And why is the opinion of a dead novelist relevant to this discussion?&lt;/em&gt;

There is a term for this the Rand followers have, and it is virgin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Her best boy Alan Greenspan didn’t exactly cover himself in glory.</em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to believe he was once considered a follower of Rand. His last years as Fed Chairman were part of the housing bubble.</p>
<p><em>And why is the opinion of a dead novelist relevant to this discussion?</em></p>
<p>There is a term for this the Rand followers have, and it is virgin.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Horner</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-1/#comment-1483736</link>
		<dc:creator>John Horner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 05:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483736</guid>
		<description>&quot;With Barry, Nancy, and Ronnie on the case, they will manage to kill-off ladder-frame trucks and therefore remove any positive cash-flow from any division anywhere in GM.&#039;

Pure delusional speculation. So far we have seen GM announce plans to import more vehicles, many of those from China (a first). GM and Chrysler are closing factories and dealerships at a record pace, hardly the sort of thing Government Owned Failing Businesses are exactly known for. UAW members and non-UAW members are getting shown the door at an ever faster rate. How do you square the actual news with these fantasies about what you are just gosh darn certain the Democrats are going to do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8220;With Barry, Nancy, and Ronnie on the case, they will manage to kill-off ladder-frame trucks and therefore remove any positive cash-flow from any division anywhere in GM.&#8217;</p>
<p>Pure delusional speculation. So far we have seen GM announce plans to import more vehicles, many of those from China (a first). GM and Chrysler are closing factories and dealerships at a record pace, hardly the sort of thing Government Owned Failing Businesses are exactly known for. UAW members and non-UAW members are getting shown the door at an ever faster rate. How do you square the actual news with these fantasies about what you are just gosh darn certain the Democrats are going to do?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wytshus</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-1/#comment-1483730</link>
		<dc:creator>wytshus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 04:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483730</guid>
		<description>Funny how last year&#039;s oil spike is never mentioned, even in passing, about the current financial crisis.  

Oh well, Make Mine Freedom!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVh75ylAUXY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Funny how last year&#8217;s oil spike is never mentioned, even in passing, about the current financial crisis.  </p>
<p>Oh well, Make Mine Freedom!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVh75ylAUXY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVh75ylAUXY</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruckover</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-1/#comment-1483729</link>
		<dc:creator>ruckover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 04:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483729</guid>
		<description>Again, I enter into TTAC to make a comment that is not about cars, but I do want to say that I come to this site several times a day because of my love of cars.

Honest to goodness, there was a long list of deregulations that led to our fiscal breakdown.  It was not a matter of a few regulators turning their eyes from their duties, it was a matter of powerful politicos changing laws: Phil and Wendy Gram being two examples.  These are not evil people, but I believe them to be misguided.

One cannot enforce laws and safeguards that have been eliminated.  I am glad that your middle school kids are smart enough to recognize the problem you described; unfortunately, that is not analogous to the economic problems we face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Again, I enter into TTAC to make a comment that is not about cars, but I do want to say that I come to this site several times a day because of my love of cars.</p>
<p>Honest to goodness, there was a long list of deregulations that led to our fiscal breakdown.  It was not a matter of a few regulators turning their eyes from their duties, it was a matter of powerful politicos changing laws: Phil and Wendy Gram being two examples.  These are not evil people, but I believe them to be misguided.</p>
<p>One cannot enforce laws and safeguards that have been eliminated.  I am glad that your middle school kids are smart enough to recognize the problem you described; unfortunately, that is not analogous to the economic problems we face.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony7914</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-1/#comment-1483726</link>
		<dc:creator>tony7914</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 04:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483726</guid>
		<description>@Rastus : 
May 14th, 2009 at 9:07 pm 

http://www.njweedman.com/fatass.jpg

Damn, it&#039;s going to take awhile to get that image out of my mind. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@Rastus :<br />
May 14th, 2009 at 9:07 pm </p>
<p><a href="http://www.njweedman.com/fatass.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.njweedman.com/fatass.jpg</a></p>
<p>Damn, it&#8217;s going to take awhile to get that image out of my mind. Thanks!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HEATHROI</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-1/#comment-1483725</link>
		<dc:creator>HEATHROI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 04:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483725</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Abso-freaking-loutely the truth. I teach social studies to middle school kids in Gallup, NM. Guess what? Whey you ask the kid the question, “A road has a 35mph speed limit, you drive 45mph down it and blow past a cop and he does nothing, do you need new, tougher speed limits?

Their answer? “No, Mr. Fruchey.”

“If you already have the law you need what should you do with it to make it effective?”

Student: “Enforce it.”&lt;/em&gt;

One could just repeal the 35 mph law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Abso-freaking-loutely the truth. I teach social studies to middle school kids in Gallup, NM. Guess what? Whey you ask the kid the question, “A road has a 35mph speed limit, you drive 45mph down it and blow past a cop and he does nothing, do you need new, tougher speed limits?</p>
<p>Their answer? “No, Mr. Fruchey.”</p>
<p>“If you already have the law you need what should you do with it to make it effective?”</p>
<p>Student: “Enforce it.”</em></p>
<p>One could just repeal the 35 mph law.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: educatordan</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-1/#comment-1483713</link>
		<dc:creator>educatordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 03:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483713</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;jkross22 :
May 14th, 2009 at 7:36 pm

Lack of regulation isn’t the root cause problem - lack of enforcement is.

We don’t lack the laws or regulation - we lack the follow through.&lt;/em&gt;

Abso-freaking-loutely the truth.  I teach social studies to middle school kids in Gallup, NM.  Guess what?  Whey you ask the kid the question, &quot;A road has a 35mph speed limit, you drive 45mph down it and blow past a cop and he does nothing, do you need new, tougher speed limits?  

Their answer?  &quot;No, Mr. Fruchey.&quot;

&quot;If you already have the law you need what should you do with it to make it effective?&quot;

Student: &quot;Enforce it.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>jkross22 :<br />
May 14th, 2009 at 7:36 pm</p>
<p>Lack of regulation isn’t the root cause problem &#8211; lack of enforcement is.</p>
<p>We don’t lack the laws or regulation &#8211; we lack the follow through.</em></p>
<p>Abso-freaking-loutely the truth.  I teach social studies to middle school kids in Gallup, NM.  Guess what?  Whey you ask the kid the question, &#8220;A road has a 35mph speed limit, you drive 45mph down it and blow past a cop and he does nothing, do you need new, tougher speed limits?  </p>
<p>Their answer?  &#8220;No, Mr. Fruchey.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;If you already have the law you need what should you do with it to make it effective?&#8221;</p>
<p>Student: &#8220;Enforce it.&#8221;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarnotCycle</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-1/#comment-1483708</link>
		<dc:creator>CarnotCycle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 03:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483708</guid>
		<description>With GM on the titties for &quot;only&quot; two more years...what &quot;revolutionary&quot; eco-car could they crank out short of the Volt? Especially given the new Prius has a bigger motor and better gas mileage, for under $25k...and its still not running Li-ion. So, you can get a Prius with every widget on the options list for something like $10k less than a bare-bones Volt. And you can buy it today, not forty-billion dollars of tax-chum later in 2010. Put Li-ion in the Prius, and the Volt really looks bad now. 

With Barry, Nancy, and Ronnie on the case, they will manage to kill-off ladder-frame trucks and therefore remove any positive cash-flow from any division anywhere in GM. 

It takes awhile to completely re-tool to a product no one wants or a product everyone wants. Throw in the standard doubling of both time and cost associated with government operations, and I don&#039;t see how this is going to work in the time allotted, even if I was an enthusiast for this Government Motors situation, I just don&#039;t see how this can work product-wise in the projected timespan of suckling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->With GM on the titties for &#8220;only&#8221; two more years&#8230;what &#8220;revolutionary&#8221; eco-car could they crank out short of the Volt? Especially given the new Prius has a bigger motor and better gas mileage, for under $25k&#8230;and its still not running Li-ion. So, you can get a Prius with every widget on the options list for something like $10k less than a bare-bones Volt. And you can buy it today, not forty-billion dollars of tax-chum later in 2010. Put Li-ion in the Prius, and the Volt really looks bad now. </p>
<p>With Barry, Nancy, and Ronnie on the case, they will manage to kill-off ladder-frame trucks and therefore remove any positive cash-flow from any division anywhere in GM. </p>
<p>It takes awhile to completely re-tool to a product no one wants or a product everyone wants. Throw in the standard doubling of both time and cost associated with government operations, and I don&#8217;t see how this is going to work in the time allotted, even if I was an enthusiast for this Government Motors situation, I just don&#8217;t see how this can work product-wise in the projected timespan of suckling.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lw</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-1/#comment-1483698</link>
		<dc:creator>lw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 02:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483698</guid>
		<description>GM Management are the parents..

The UAW is the wild child...

The wild child turns 16 and torches 10 Mercedes at a local dealer...

The parents are held liable in civil court and lose everything they spent 20 years building.. the home, the dream retirement... everything...

They all move into a trailer, the 16 year old runs off, the husband starts drinking, the 14 year old daughter is left to fend for herself and becomes pregnant, the wife is working 2 jobs just to keep the lights on.

Who do you blame?  Once you figure out who to blame, how do you punish them?

These lines from Casino sum all of Detroit up:

&quot;Nobody knew all the details,
but it should&#039;ve been perfect.                
I mean, he had me, Nicky Santoro,
his best friend, watching his ass..                   
and he had, Ginger,
the woman he loved, on his arm.                   
But in the end,
we f_cked it all up.                   
It should&#039;ve been so sweet too.                   
But it turned out to be the last time
that street guys like us...                   
were ever given anything
that f_ckin&#039; valuable again.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->GM Management are the parents..</p>
<p>The UAW is the wild child&#8230;</p>
<p>The wild child turns 16 and torches 10 Mercedes at a local dealer&#8230;</p>
<p>The parents are held liable in civil court and lose everything they spent 20 years building.. the home, the dream retirement&#8230; everything&#8230;</p>
<p>They all move into a trailer, the 16 year old runs off, the husband starts drinking, the 14 year old daughter is left to fend for herself and becomes pregnant, the wife is working 2 jobs just to keep the lights on.</p>
<p>Who do you blame?  Once you figure out who to blame, how do you punish them?</p>
<p>These lines from Casino sum all of Detroit up:</p>
<p>&#8220;Nobody knew all the details,<br />
but it should&#8217;ve been perfect.<br />
I mean, he had me, Nicky Santoro,<br />
his best friend, watching his ass..<br />
and he had, Ginger,<br />
the woman he loved, on his arm.<br />
But in the end,<br />
we f_cked it all up.<br />
It should&#8217;ve been so sweet too.<br />
But it turned out to be the last time<br />
that street guys like us&#8230;<br />
were ever given anything<br />
that f_ckin&#8217; valuable again.&#8221;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlos.negros</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-1/#comment-1483693</link>
		<dc:creator>carlos.negros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 02:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483693</guid>
		<description>Obama did this. He destroyed GM and Chrysler all in a little over 100 days! 

They were in perfect shape with no chance of going under. Oh, the poor investors!

Why does he hate America so much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Obama did this. He destroyed GM and Chrysler all in a little over 100 days! </p>
<p>They were in perfect shape with no chance of going under. Oh, the poor investors!</p>
<p>Why does he hate America so much?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rastus</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-1/#comment-1483690</link>
		<dc:creator>Rastus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 02:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483690</guid>
		<description>cardeveloper,

&quot;Kill the entire industry?&quot;

Your question is biased...very much so.  You are implying that *I*, or some external &quot;entity&quot; will be doing the &quot;Killing&quot;.

Nothing...and I repeat NOTHING could be further from the truth.

You&#039;re placing blame where blame does not exist.  It never has.  

Yes, all companies are hurting.  But a junkie high on heroin will tell you the same thing if you don&#039;t give him another &quot;fix&quot;...that YOU&#039;LL be KILLING him!!!

The question you should pose is &quot;What opportunities should I have taken, vs. pissing them all away in the past, to have prevented this situation?  What have I learned from 30+ years of failure which will carry me forward?&quot;

Furthermore, it&#039;s not enough to just &quot;know&quot; what you need to do...you need to ACTUALLY DO IT!!  Take action!  Stop your self-destructive behavior and take positive action...and no, that does NOT include crushing and destroying each and EVERY (save for museum pieces) EV-1s.

Sorry buddy, I don&#039;t accept blame for the death of GM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->cardeveloper,</p>
<p>&#8220;Kill the entire industry?&#8221;</p>
<p>Your question is biased&#8230;very much so.  You are implying that *I*, or some external &#8220;entity&#8221; will be doing the &#8220;Killing&#8221;.</p>
<p>Nothing&#8230;and I repeat NOTHING could be further from the truth.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re placing blame where blame does not exist.  It never has.  </p>
<p>Yes, all companies are hurting.  But a junkie high on heroin will tell you the same thing if you don&#8217;t give him another &#8220;fix&#8221;&#8230;that YOU&#8217;LL be KILLING him!!!</p>
<p>The question you should pose is &#8220;What opportunities should I have taken, vs. pissing them all away in the past, to have prevented this situation?  What have I learned from 30+ years of failure which will carry me forward?&#8221;</p>
<p>Furthermore, it&#8217;s not enough to just &#8220;know&#8221; what you need to do&#8230;you need to ACTUALLY DO IT!!  Take action!  Stop your self-destructive behavior and take positive action&#8230;and no, that does NOT include crushing and destroying each and EVERY (save for museum pieces) EV-1s.</p>
<p>Sorry buddy, I don&#8217;t accept blame for the death of GM.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mel23</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-1/#comment-1483688</link>
		<dc:creator>mel23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 02:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483688</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see any indication that Obama &amp; Co. have any interest in running a car company. Exhibit A is that they seem happy to let Fiat run off with Chrysler for free. What are the odds that Fiat will make a go of what they&#039;re biting off? Very small IMO, but Obama seems happy to avoid having to get involved. What they do seem interested in is preventing the collapse of the domestic industry at least now when our economy is moving sideways on the slippery slope. My expectation is that they&#039;ll administer life support to GM for a time until they can pull out without the immediate crash of all concerned. And then GM will fail, thrive or gradually shrivel. I expect the latter unless they can somehow clean house at the top several layers and get a crew in place who gives a damn and has a clue. Henderson ain&#039;t going to get it done. If we&#039;re lucky Ford will carry on and gain until they screw up again. This is a wickedly competitive industry with excess, but shrinking, capacity. Lots of flux with China looming as an additional potential disruptive source. Toyota, although currently stressed, seems poised to gain given their complete coverage of the market, and take up slack created by GM&#039;s shrinkage. Honda will be Honda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I don&#8217;t see any indication that Obama &amp; Co. have any interest in running a car company. Exhibit A is that they seem happy to let Fiat run off with Chrysler for free. What are the odds that Fiat will make a go of what they&#8217;re biting off? Very small IMO, but Obama seems happy to avoid having to get involved. What they do seem interested in is preventing the collapse of the domestic industry at least now when our economy is moving sideways on the slippery slope. My expectation is that they&#8217;ll administer life support to GM for a time until they can pull out without the immediate crash of all concerned. And then GM will fail, thrive or gradually shrivel. I expect the latter unless they can somehow clean house at the top several layers and get a crew in place who gives a damn and has a clue. Henderson ain&#8217;t going to get it done. If we&#8217;re lucky Ford will carry on and gain until they screw up again. This is a wickedly competitive industry with excess, but shrinking, capacity. Lots of flux with China looming as an additional potential disruptive source. Toyota, although currently stressed, seems poised to gain given their complete coverage of the market, and take up slack created by GM&#8217;s shrinkage. Honda will be Honda.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cardeveloper</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-between-the-lines-gm-does-not-welcome-its-new-governmental-overlords/comment-page-1/#comment-1483686</link>
		<dc:creator>cardeveloper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 02:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315057#comment-1483686</guid>
		<description>Rastus,

GM sales are down
Chrysler sales are down
Ford sales are down
So are Toyota, Honda, etc etc, etc
The entire industry&#039;s sales are down, way down.  All the companies are losing money, big time money.  Kill the entire industry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Rastus,</p>
<p>GM sales are down<br />
Chrysler sales are down<br />
Ford sales are down<br />
So are Toyota, Honda, etc etc, etc<br />
The entire industry&#8217;s sales are down, way down.  All the companies are losing money, big time money.  Kill the entire industry?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 72/162 queries in 0.171 seconds using apc

Served from: autoforums.com @ 2010-03-18 16:05:24 -->