<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E85 Boondoogle of the Day: &#8220;Let Them Eat Rice&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/e85-boondoogle-of-the-day-let-them-eat-rice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/e85-boondoogle-of-the-day-let-them-eat-rice/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:34:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/e85-boondoogle-of-the-day-let-them-eat-rice/comment-page-1/#comment-683782</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=63122#comment-683782</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;EJ_San_Fran : 
August 13th, 2008 at 7:46 pm 

What would you rather be:
1. a vegetarian driving a car, or
2. a pork chop chewer on a bicyle?&lt;/em&gt;

How about eating a vegetarian while driving an SUV? :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>EJ_San_Fran :<br />
August 13th, 2008 at 7:46 pm </p>
<p>What would you rather be:<br />
1. a vegetarian driving a car, or<br />
2. a pork chop chewer on a bicyle?</em></p>
<p>How about eating a vegetarian while driving an SUV? :D<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Holzman</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/e85-boondoogle-of-the-day-let-them-eat-rice/comment-page-1/#comment-683632</link>
		<dc:creator>David Holzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=63122#comment-683632</guid>
		<description>Kudos to the Weekly Standard (from a liberal)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Kudos to the Weekly Standard (from a liberal)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ihatetrees</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/e85-boondoogle-of-the-day-let-them-eat-rice/comment-page-1/#comment-682042</link>
		<dc:creator>ihatetrees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=63122#comment-682042</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;gamper:
1) Get involved in the futures markets if you are worried stable prices.&lt;/i&gt;

Futures work well for weather and other natural uncertainties. Futures based on legislative or political acts don&#039;t work because they are illegal. Don&#039;t get me wrong - food futures contracts based on market distorting legislation pending in congress would be a plus. 

&lt;i&gt;2) Selfishness and morality are relative terms….which was my point&lt;/i&gt;

Given that statement, there&#039;s no point in continuing this discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><i>gamper:<br />
1) Get involved in the futures markets if you are worried stable prices.</i></p>
<p>Futures work well for weather and other natural uncertainties. Futures based on legislative or political acts don&#8217;t work because they are illegal. Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; food futures contracts based on market distorting legislation pending in congress would be a plus. </p>
<p><i>2) Selfishness and morality are relative terms….which was my point</i></p>
<p>Given that statement, there&#8217;s no point in continuing this discussion.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gamper</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/e85-boondoogle-of-the-day-let-them-eat-rice/comment-page-1/#comment-681961</link>
		<dc:creator>gamper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=63122#comment-681961</guid>
		<description>ihatetrees : 



gamper:
That being said, I find it rather troubling when anyone suggests it is somehow our responsibility to feed the world’s hungry. We are not the only nation with surplus food supplies or a powerful farm lobby.

&lt;em&gt;The point is price and market stability, which corn ethanol distorts. People make long term commitments based on a certain price range.&lt;/em&gt;

Why should Grassley be condemned when so many other nations around the world have policies in place that are just as openly self serving.

&lt;em&gt;Because it is right to condemn an amoral, selfish POS regardless of location.&lt;/em&gt;


1) Get involved in the futures markets if you are worried stable prices.

2) Selfishness and morality are relative terms....which was my point.  It is easy to curse the selfishness and lack of morality of others, it is quite another thing to get out your wallet when someone comes to your door asking for a donation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->ihatetrees : </p>
<p>gamper:<br />
That being said, I find it rather troubling when anyone suggests it is somehow our responsibility to feed the world’s hungry. We are not the only nation with surplus food supplies or a powerful farm lobby.</p>
<p><em>The point is price and market stability, which corn ethanol distorts. People make long term commitments based on a certain price range.</em></p>
<p>Why should Grassley be condemned when so many other nations around the world have policies in place that are just as openly self serving.</p>
<p><em>Because it is right to condemn an amoral, selfish POS regardless of location.</em></p>
<p>1) Get involved in the futures markets if you are worried stable prices.</p>
<p>2) Selfishness and morality are relative terms&#8230;.which was my point.  It is easy to curse the selfishness and lack of morality of others, it is quite another thing to get out your wallet when someone comes to your door asking for a donation.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ihatetrees</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/e85-boondoogle-of-the-day-let-them-eat-rice/comment-page-1/#comment-681812</link>
		<dc:creator>ihatetrees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=63122#comment-681812</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;gamper:
That being said, I find it rather troubling when anyone suggests it is somehow our responsibility to feed the world’s hungry. We are not the only nation with surplus food supplies or a powerful farm lobby.&lt;/i&gt;

The point is price and market stability, which corn ethanol distorts. People make long term commitments based on a certain price range.

&lt;i&gt;Why should Grassley be condemned when so many other nations around the world have policies in place that are just as openly self serving.&lt;/i&gt;

Because it is right to condemn an amoral, selfish POS regardless of location.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><i>gamper:<br />
That being said, I find it rather troubling when anyone suggests it is somehow our responsibility to feed the world’s hungry. We are not the only nation with surplus food supplies or a powerful farm lobby.</i></p>
<p>The point is price and market stability, which corn ethanol distorts. People make long term commitments based on a certain price range.</p>
<p><i>Why should Grassley be condemned when so many other nations around the world have policies in place that are just as openly self serving.</i></p>
<p>Because it is right to condemn an amoral, selfish POS regardless of location.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EJ_San_Fran</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/e85-boondoogle-of-the-day-let-them-eat-rice/comment-page-1/#comment-681671</link>
		<dc:creator>EJ_San_Fran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=63122#comment-681671</guid>
		<description>What would you rather be:
1. a vegetarian driving a car, or 
2. a pork chop chewer on a bicyle?
Just asking, because the way they put it the choice is between feeding corn to cars or pigs.

(maybe the choice is not that stark in reality?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->What would you rather be:<br />
1. a vegetarian driving a car, or<br />
2. a pork chop chewer on a bicyle?<br />
Just asking, because the way they put it the choice is between feeding corn to cars or pigs.</p>
<p>(maybe the choice is not that stark in reality?)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkross22</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/e85-boondoogle-of-the-day-let-them-eat-rice/comment-page-1/#comment-681581</link>
		<dc:creator>jkross22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=63122#comment-681581</guid>
		<description>If a business needs to be subsidized to survive, the business model doesn&#039;t work.  

The sooner McCain or Obama starts addressing this issue, the better.  Although, to McCain&#039;s credit, he let Iowa know exactly where he stands on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->If a business needs to be subsidized to survive, the business model doesn&#8217;t work.  </p>
<p>The sooner McCain or Obama starts addressing this issue, the better.  Although, to McCain&#8217;s credit, he let Iowa know exactly where he stands on this.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patapon</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/e85-boondoogle-of-the-day-let-them-eat-rice/comment-page-1/#comment-681462</link>
		<dc:creator>Patapon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=63122#comment-681462</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Why should Grassley be condemned when so many other nations around the world have policies in place that are just as openly self serving.&lt;/i&gt;

I think when a government fashions itself to be the protector of the world, its people might start to believe it. I don&#039;t think the Chinese have that issue, but I don&#039;t live there and only read the propaganda on -this- side of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><i>Why should Grassley be condemned when so many other nations around the world have policies in place that are just as openly self serving.</i></p>
<p>I think when a government fashions itself to be the protector of the world, its people might start to believe it. I don&#8217;t think the Chinese have that issue, but I don&#8217;t live there and only read the propaganda on -this- side of the world.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldandSlow</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/e85-boondoogle-of-the-day-let-them-eat-rice/comment-page-1/#comment-681442</link>
		<dc:creator>OldandSlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=63122#comment-681442</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see very many of these E85 pumps in my area. I assume that the gasoline I buy has about 10% Ethanol in it, but I would prefer to be given a choice at the pump. 

There is so much Agribusiness lobbying money behind this. They get paid a subsidy to turn corn into ethanol and I can&#039;t even set up a still out back to make white lightning.  I&#039;ll bet that cattle ranchers, hog and poultry farmers are not big fans of Sen. Grasley.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I don&#8217;t see very many of these E85 pumps in my area. I assume that the gasoline I buy has about 10% Ethanol in it, but I would prefer to be given a choice at the pump. </p>
<p>There is so much Agribusiness lobbying money behind this. They get paid a subsidy to turn corn into ethanol and I can&#8217;t even set up a still out back to make white lightning.  I&#8217;ll bet that cattle ranchers, hog and poultry farmers are not big fans of Sen. Grasley.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gamper</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/e85-boondoogle-of-the-day-let-them-eat-rice/comment-page-1/#comment-680932</link>
		<dc:creator>gamper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 20:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=63122#comment-680932</guid>
		<description>Regardless of how you feel about ethanol production, there is really no way to suggest that diverting food stocks for other uses, such as fattening the pockets of US agribusiness, when there are starving people in the world makes sense or is in any way responsible and humane.

That being said, I find it rather troubling when anyone suggests it is somehow our responsibility to feed the world&#039;s hungry.  We are not the only nation with surplus food supplies or a powerful farm lobby.

Furthermore, it may be a more productive enterprise to relocate those starving people to regions capable of supporting sustained agriculture and human life rather than throwing food at those who will still be hungry next year, and the year after that.

Why should Grassley be condemned when so many other nations around the world have policies in place that are just as openly self serving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Regardless of how you feel about ethanol production, there is really no way to suggest that diverting food stocks for other uses, such as fattening the pockets of US agribusiness, when there are starving people in the world makes sense or is in any way responsible and humane.</p>
<p>That being said, I find it rather troubling when anyone suggests it is somehow our responsibility to feed the world&#8217;s hungry.  We are not the only nation with surplus food supplies or a powerful farm lobby.</p>
<p>Furthermore, it may be a more productive enterprise to relocate those starving people to regions capable of supporting sustained agriculture and human life rather than throwing food at those who will still be hungry next year, and the year after that.</p>
<p>Why should Grassley be condemned when so many other nations around the world have policies in place that are just as openly self serving.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 42/72 queries in 0.136 seconds using apc

Served from: autoforums.com @ 2010-03-20 07:46:45 -->