<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily Podcast: Hold on Tight to Your Dreams</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/daily-podcast-hold-on-tight-to-your-dreams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/daily-podcast-hold-on-tight-to-your-dreams/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:23:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Johnster</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/daily-podcast-hold-on-tight-to-your-dreams/comment-page-1/#comment-90053</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 07:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/podcasts/daily-podcast-hold-on-tight-to-your-dreams/#comment-90053</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that V-6 powered Accord is a very decent, reasonably-priced car that I might actually, one day, be able to buy.  Even similar near-luxury cars (Cadillac CTS, Lincoln MKZ, Infiniti G35, Acura TL, Lexus ES350, Volvo S60) seems, to me, to be just a bit pretencious.

The last time I went new car shopping I actually narrowed my choices down to the Accord V-6 and the Camry V-6.  Then when I got to the dealerships and started contemplating the actual payments.  Before I knew it, I was next considering 4-cylinder Accord and 4-cylinder Camrys, and then Civics and Corollas.

And that&#039;s how I ended up with a Civic.

But I still aspire to a V-6 Honda Accord Coupe.  (And when you squint really hard it sort of looks like a Bentley Continental.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->It seems to me that V-6 powered Accord is a very decent, reasonably-priced car that I might actually, one day, be able to buy.  Even similar near-luxury cars (Cadillac CTS, Lincoln MKZ, Infiniti G35, Acura TL, Lexus ES350, Volvo S60) seems, to me, to be just a bit pretencious.</p>
<p>The last time I went new car shopping I actually narrowed my choices down to the Accord V-6 and the Camry V-6.  Then when I got to the dealerships and started contemplating the actual payments.  Before I knew it, I was next considering 4-cylinder Accord and 4-cylinder Camrys, and then Civics and Corollas.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s how I ended up with a Civic.</p>
<p>But I still aspire to a V-6 Honda Accord Coupe.  (And when you squint really hard it sort of looks like a Bentley Continental.)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/daily-podcast-hold-on-tight-to-your-dreams/comment-page-1/#comment-90028</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 03:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/podcasts/daily-podcast-hold-on-tight-to-your-dreams/#comment-90028</guid>
		<description>Kevin. I have bad news for you. 

I have owned a 2002 Accord and a 2003. 

The 2002, which is similar to your 2001, is, IMHO, a more pleasant car to own. 

The 2003 was a better handling car, it felt more stable and more locked into the road, and it had 20% more power (both V6s the 2002 is 200 hp the 2003 is 240), but, I did not care for its ergonomics. The 2003 actually gets slightly better mileage than the 2002.

Switches and gauges were styled to look good, not be most usable. Why was the ventilation fan speed control between the radio knobs? The fuel gauge which was vertical with F on top was changed to horizontal. The arm rest trays in the the 2002 had openers arranged vertically, the one on top was opened by the top lever. The 2003 put them in the same plane and it was impossible to select the right one without experimentation.

Further, the greenhouse in the 2002 is more open than the 2003 and gives better visibility. I found the 2003 induced mild claustrophobia. I think the 2002 is a bit shorter and lighter than the 2003.

A couple of moths ago I traded the 2003 in for a new CUV for the wife. There were other issues such as value and which car carried a note, but I am perfectly content continuing to own the 2002. 

The 2008 is a different car than either the 2002 or the 2003. It is on the platform used for the Acura RL and the JDM Legend, and qualifies as a large car under EPA rules. It is bigger than what I need now and I doubt that I would buy one. Because the 2002 still has many years and miles (odo is at 40K) of service left, I expect that I will not have to replace it soon. Unless, one of my kids takes it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Kevin. I have bad news for you. </p>
<p>I have owned a 2002 Accord and a 2003. </p>
<p>The 2002, which is similar to your 2001, is, IMHO, a more pleasant car to own. </p>
<p>The 2003 was a better handling car, it felt more stable and more locked into the road, and it had 20% more power (both V6s the 2002 is 200 hp the 2003 is 240), but, I did not care for its ergonomics. The 2003 actually gets slightly better mileage than the 2002.</p>
<p>Switches and gauges were styled to look good, not be most usable. Why was the ventilation fan speed control between the radio knobs? The fuel gauge which was vertical with F on top was changed to horizontal. The arm rest trays in the the 2002 had openers arranged vertically, the one on top was opened by the top lever. The 2003 put them in the same plane and it was impossible to select the right one without experimentation.</p>
<p>Further, the greenhouse in the 2002 is more open than the 2003 and gives better visibility. I found the 2003 induced mild claustrophobia. I think the 2002 is a bit shorter and lighter than the 2003.</p>
<p>A couple of moths ago I traded the 2003 in for a new CUV for the wife. There were other issues such as value and which car carried a note, but I am perfectly content continuing to own the 2002. </p>
<p>The 2008 is a different car than either the 2002 or the 2003. It is on the platform used for the Acura RL and the JDM Legend, and qualifies as a large car under EPA rules. It is bigger than what I need now and I doubt that I would buy one. Because the 2002 still has many years and miles (odo is at 40K) of service left, I expect that I will not have to replace it soon. Unless, one of my kids takes it.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Kluttz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/daily-podcast-hold-on-tight-to-your-dreams/comment-page-1/#comment-89717</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Kluttz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 06:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/podcasts/daily-podcast-hold-on-tight-to-your-dreams/#comment-89717</guid>
		<description>The Accord is quite an uncommon sedan.  I did lust after one since 1986 until I could afford one in 2001.  172000 miles later, I hope it NEVER wears out.  And it&#039;s just 6th gen.  It IS a car to lust after.  It is the perfect car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The Accord is quite an uncommon sedan.  I did lust after one since 1986 until I could afford one in 2001.  172000 miles later, I hope it NEVER wears out.  And it&#8217;s just 6th gen.  It IS a car to lust after.  It is the perfect car.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt B</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/daily-podcast-hold-on-tight-to-your-dreams/comment-page-1/#comment-89705</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 03:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/podcasts/daily-podcast-hold-on-tight-to-your-dreams/#comment-89705</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll more disliked than ever for this comment ;-)

I feel sorrier for people who lust after low end luxury marques than those who lust after a common sedan. At least with the Accord et al you aren&#039;t paying extra for the logo and getting nothing in return.

And no, I don&#039;t lust after the Accord.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;ll more disliked than ever for this comment ;-)</p>
<p>I feel sorrier for people who lust after low end luxury marques than those who lust after a common sedan. At least with the Accord et al you aren&#8217;t paying extra for the logo and getting nothing in return.</p>
<p>And no, I don&#8217;t lust after the Accord.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/daily-podcast-hold-on-tight-to-your-dreams/comment-page-1/#comment-89702</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/podcasts/daily-podcast-hold-on-tight-to-your-dreams/#comment-89702</guid>
		<description>Try the new Springsteen Album.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Try the new Springsteen Album.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueBrat</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/daily-podcast-hold-on-tight-to-your-dreams/comment-page-1/#comment-89662</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueBrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/podcasts/daily-podcast-hold-on-tight-to-your-dreams/#comment-89662</guid>
		<description>Oh please for the love of sanity, bring those accident-blinders over to the US. It&#039;s like a reality-TV show for people here. it&#039;s especially annoying when it&#039;s on the other side!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Oh please for the love of sanity, bring those accident-blinders over to the US. It&#8217;s like a reality-TV show for people here. it&#8217;s especially annoying when it&#8217;s on the other side!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtual Insanity</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/daily-podcast-hold-on-tight-to-your-dreams/comment-page-1/#comment-89606</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtual Insanity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/podcasts/daily-podcast-hold-on-tight-to-your-dreams/#comment-89606</guid>
		<description>I once saw this racing video of an Aston Martin blasting around, and this techno&#039;y version of &quot;Zombie&quot; by The Cranberries was playing over the video.  I kinda looked at it funny, and was like...I&#039;m sure I&#039;m not the only one that sees any irony in this.

Of course, nothing beats the old Caddy adds.  American car based on a German design blasting around to a British rock band.  I dig it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I once saw this racing video of an Aston Martin blasting around, and this techno&#8217;y version of &#8220;Zombie&#8221; by The Cranberries was playing over the video.  I kinda looked at it funny, and was like&#8230;I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;m not the only one that sees any irony in this.</p>
<p>Of course, nothing beats the old Caddy adds.  American car based on a German design blasting around to a British rock band.  I dig it.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sammy Hagar</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/daily-podcast-hold-on-tight-to-your-dreams/comment-page-1/#comment-89601</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy Hagar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/podcasts/daily-podcast-hold-on-tight-to-your-dreams/#comment-89601</guid>
		<description>I suspect just when you finally get ELO out of your head Chery will roll onto our shores w/&quot;Love Fool&quot; by The Cardigans.  Enjoy your Jeff Lynne Special Value Edition while you can...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I suspect just when you finally get ELO out of your head Chery will roll onto our shores w/&#8221;Love Fool&#8221; by The Cardigans.  Enjoy your Jeff Lynne Special Value Edition while you can&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 37/63 queries in 0.134 seconds using apc

Served from: autoforums.com @ 2010-03-22 06:00:07 -->