Curbside Classic: Ultra Rare Panhard Dyna Junior X87 Roadster Found Abused In Used Car Lot

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer

There’s not much doubt that this is the rarest find Curbside Classics, at least so far. And there it was, right under my nose, on Main Street. In fact, it’s so rare that I didn’t really recognize it at first. I’d caught a glimpse of it once before, in the back of a typical used car lot in Springfield, Eugene’s blue-collar neighbor. Given its location, size, shape, and paint job, I initially thought it was some kind of amusement park ride car, or a former Shriner-mobile. Or at best, some kind of garage-built sports car special from the fifties. I drove on, but made a mental note, and on my next sojourn to the inspiration for Homer Simpson’s hometown, I decided it was worth a quick stop and closer look. What I found totally blew me away: a Panhard Dyna Junior Roadster.

Probably the first thing we need to do to put this pathetically mutilated cutie in perspective is to take a look at it in its proper glory:

Not exactly a Porsche 356, and that smiley face only goes so far in lightening a rather blunt front end. It’s rather curious, given how different it looks from the rest of the Panhard Dyna s edans of its time.

A companion piece “ An Illustrated History Of Panhard” follows this Curbside Classic, which will help put this Dyna Junior into proper historical perspective. The Dyna series was a brilliant and advanced line of ultra-lightweight cars with air-cooled two-cylinder boxer engines driving the front wheels. It first appeared in 1946, and even major parts of the body were built out of aluminum. They quickly established a reputation for surprising performance given its tiny engine and yet roomy bodies.

The Junior Roadster, also called X87 in some references, first appeared in 1952, with a 750 cc twin and 38 hp. Later version were increased to 850 cc and 42 hp. And there are references to a supercharged version with 62 hp. Given its weight of barely 1400 lbs, this resulted in a remarkably sprightly car for the times, with a top speed of seventy five and yielding some 45 mpg. Variations on the Junior with coupe and more aerodynamic bodies were regular fixtures for years at Le Mans.

Beginning with the 1953 race, where a Panhard won the Index of Performance award, DB Panhard coupes went on to a long string of victories and high placed finishes in that category where engine size is factored into the outcome. And the little Roadsters like this one were popular on the sports car circuit where the aerodynamic benefits of the special DB coupe bodies were not as critical.

What’s curious from this one picture of a Junior’s engine compartment that I found is that the little twin has no fan or cooling shroud. Every Dyna engine I’ve ever seen pictures of has a distinctive blower in an aluminum housing at the front, and ducting to carry the air effectively over the cylinder fins. It may be that this particular Junior was modified, possible for racing, where the fan would rob it of power, and there might be enough airflow from the steady higher speed to keep it cool like a motorcycle engine.

The total production of Juniors is placed by one source at 3,937 units. How many came to the US is a good question; it wasn’t likely more than a handful. Panhards were probably imported on a very small scale to the US in the fifties, probably at Citroen dealers. Citroen eventually took over Panhard, and they shared a similar love of air-cooled boxer twins, but in its latter years the Panhard became more upscale than the Citroen twins, and its final model, the 24 from 1963, was a remarkable little coupe with strong Corvair styling influence but still powered by the boxer twin. Despite its handsome body and lively performance, it just became too much of a stretch for the substantial money Panhard was asking, and Panhard was shuttered in 1967.

This Junior has obviously been heavily gutted and turned into a pathetic little billboard. I talked to the owner who said it came with a whole barn full of cars he bought cheap some years ago. And I wasn’t the first to recognize it for what it was: someone actually paid him $700 a few years back, on behalf of a friend in the Midwest. But perhaps the current condition was unknown to the final buyer, or who knows why, but they never came back to pick it up. So this Panhard is a good little earner so far, and I’m sure the $700 richer owner would be more than happy to sell it again. And again.

Restoring this car would be quite the challenge, given that its whole front suspension and running gear is gone. A crude solid axle was welded in place, and a Jeep steering wheel sprouts uselessly out of the speedometer’s former home. The wheel is normally way to the left, allowing cozy three-across seating on a bench. It’s a wreck, no doubt about it. And its ended up in an odd circumstance. But here it is, living out its days, after a fashion. Anyone out there need a project?

Paul Niedermeyer
Paul Niedermeyer

More by Paul Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • Helmut Herbst Helmut Herbst on Oct 11, 2010

    The Panhard people did´nt like to change mechanical solutions over the years, so the missing front end parts from later models would easily fit into the Dyna Junior. We have a Junior from 1954 and a 24ct from 1964- they share a lot of parts. A Dyna Z up to May 1955 would be an ideal donor, because the engine suspension is the same as in the Junior. By the way, Ott, is is an old tradtion of Panhard drivers to lift a rear wheel just for fun- you really can trust these cars!

  • Colin Colin on Sep 16, 2023

    this was in 2010, and its 2023 now. what happened to that Panhard?

  • Calrson Fan Jeff - Agree with what you said. I think currently an EV pick-up could work in a commercial/fleet application. As someone on this site stated, w/current tech. battery vehicles just do not scale well. EBFlex - No one wanted to hate the Cyber Truck more than me but I can't ignore all the new technology and innovative thinking that went into it. There is a lot I like about it. GM, Ford & Ram should incorporate some it's design cues into their ICE trucks.
  • Michael S6 Very confusing if the move is permanent or temporary.
  • Jrhurren Worked in Detroit 18 years, live 20 minutes away. Ren Cen is a gem, but a very terrible design inside. I’m surprised GM stuck it out as long as they did there.
  • Carson D I thought that this was going to be a comparison of BFGoodrich's different truck tires.
  • Tassos Jong-iL North Korea is saving pokemon cards and amibos to buy GM in 10 years, we hope.
Next