<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CT Gov Wants Speed Cameras on I-95</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ct-gov-wants-speed-cameras-on-i-95/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ct-gov-wants-speed-cameras-on-i-95/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:21:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Swanson</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ct-gov-wants-speed-cameras-on-i-95/comment-page-1/#comment-116102</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Swanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/news-blog/ct-gov-wants-speed-cameras-on-i-95/#comment-116102</guid>
		<description>Landcrusher: &lt;em&gt;Great photo shop guys. “Greed Cameras” Priceless.&lt;/em&gt;

Actually, it&#039;s a real photo, taken in the UK.
A driver over there ummm, &quot;modified&quot; the sign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Landcrusher: <em>Great photo shop guys. “Greed Cameras” Priceless.</em></p>
<p>Actually, it&#8217;s a real photo, taken in the UK.<br />
A driver over there ummm, &#8220;modified&#8221; the sign.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landcrusher</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ct-gov-wants-speed-cameras-on-i-95/comment-page-1/#comment-111412</link>
		<dc:creator>Landcrusher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/news-blog/ct-gov-wants-speed-cameras-on-i-95/#comment-111412</guid>
		<description>Great photo shop guys. &quot;Greed Cameras&quot; Priceless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Great photo shop guys. &#8220;Greed Cameras&#8221; Priceless.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Holzman</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ct-gov-wants-speed-cameras-on-i-95/comment-page-1/#comment-110562</link>
		<dc:creator>David Holzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/news-blog/ct-gov-wants-speed-cameras-on-i-95/#comment-110562</guid>
		<description>I drive through Connecticut a lot, and it would be costly in terms of time to have to navigate around it. On the other hand, I-95 through Connecticut is awful, at least between New Haven and NYC, with narrow lanes and heavy traffic, and I almost never drive that route. If she were to put the speed cameras on 84, especially the absolutely wonderful stretch between the Mass Pike and Hartford, where everyone does 75-80, then I&#039;d be really upset. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I drive through Connecticut a lot, and it would be costly in terms of time to have to navigate around it. On the other hand, I-95 through Connecticut is awful, at least between New Haven and NYC, with narrow lanes and heavy traffic, and I almost never drive that route. If she were to put the speed cameras on 84, especially the absolutely wonderful stretch between the Mass Pike and Hartford, where everyone does 75-80, then I&#8217;d be really upset.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timoted</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ct-gov-wants-speed-cameras-on-i-95/comment-page-1/#comment-110252</link>
		<dc:creator>timoted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/news-blog/ct-gov-wants-speed-cameras-on-i-95/#comment-110252</guid>
		<description>I will throw this on the pile of reasons not to visit Connecticut. I can spend my disposable income in 49 other states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I will throw this on the pile of reasons not to visit Connecticut. I can spend my disposable income in 49 other states.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radimus</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ct-gov-wants-speed-cameras-on-i-95/comment-page-1/#comment-109822</link>
		<dc:creator>radimus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/news-blog/ct-gov-wants-speed-cameras-on-i-95/#comment-109822</guid>
		<description>No big deal.  Connecticut is a small state and easy to navigate around.  If they want to install greed cameras then I don&#039;t need to spend any money in their state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->No big deal.  Connecticut is a small state and easy to navigate around.  If they want to install greed cameras then I don&#8217;t need to spend any money in their state.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TexasAg03</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ct-gov-wants-speed-cameras-on-i-95/comment-page-1/#comment-109542</link>
		<dc:creator>TexasAg03</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 15:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/news-blog/ct-gov-wants-speed-cameras-on-i-95/#comment-109542</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Just for thinking about speeding? Wow, that’s harsh.&lt;/em&gt;

This shouldn&#039;t come as a surprise.  There are already laws that punish thought; they are the increased penalties for &quot;hate crimes&quot;.  

If I beat someone because they cut me off in traffic or I wanted their wallet, that is just assault (or some form of assault).  However, if I beat someone to death because of their race or religion, that is assault with hate crimes punishment tacked on to boot.  That is punishing thought.  Period.

If you beat someone, you obviously don&#039;t care much for them.  Adding an extra penalty for &quot;hate crimes&quot; is thought punishment.  

I suppose they could start by adding extra fines or jail time for speeding in minority neighborhoods; you obviously think less of the minorities or you wouldn&#039;t speed in their part of town.  It&#039;s ludicrous, but so is &quot;hate crime&quot; punishment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Just for thinking about speeding? Wow, that’s harsh.</em></p>
<p>This shouldn&#8217;t come as a surprise.  There are already laws that punish thought; they are the increased penalties for &#8220;hate crimes&#8221;.  </p>
<p>If I beat someone because they cut me off in traffic or I wanted their wallet, that is just assault (or some form of assault).  However, if I beat someone to death because of their race or religion, that is assault with hate crimes punishment tacked on to boot.  That is punishing thought.  Period.</p>
<p>If you beat someone, you obviously don&#8217;t care much for them.  Adding an extra penalty for &#8220;hate crimes&#8221; is thought punishment.  </p>
<p>I suppose they could start by adding extra fines or jail time for speeding in minority neighborhoods; you obviously think less of the minorities or you wouldn&#8217;t speed in their part of town.  It&#8217;s ludicrous, but so is &#8220;hate crime&#8221; punishment.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 36/52 queries in 0.133 seconds using apc

Served from: autoforums.com @ 2010-03-16 16:23:00 -->