<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Corporate Identity Adapts To New Economic Environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/corporate-identity-adapts-to-new-economic-environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/corporate-identity-adapts-to-new-economic-environment/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:54:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie Schreiber</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/corporate-identity-adapts-to-new-economic-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-1076322</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie Schreiber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=194822#comment-1076322</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;In the salesperson’s office is a printed version of the “Our shitty cars” faux poster that’s been going around.&lt;/em&gt;

While generally I disapprove of heavy handed lawyerly actions against web sites or parodies, if I was GM, Ford or Chrysler I&#039;d take legal action against whoever published that poster. It&#039;s pretty defamatory. The text alone is protected speech, but put it together with &quot;our shitty cars&quot; and the companies&#039; logos and while IANAL, it looks actionable to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>In the salesperson’s office is a printed version of the “Our shitty cars” faux poster that’s been going around.</em></p>
<p>While generally I disapprove of heavy handed lawyerly actions against web sites or parodies, if I was GM, Ford or Chrysler I&#8217;d take legal action against whoever published that poster. It&#8217;s pretty defamatory. The text alone is protected speech, but put it together with &#8220;our shitty cars&#8221; and the companies&#8217; logos and while IANAL, it looks actionable to me.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie Schreiber</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/corporate-identity-adapts-to-new-economic-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-1076292</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie Schreiber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=194822#comment-1076292</guid>
		<description>Pretty sure that 3M is doing okay. They made about $4B last year and  have been profitable for a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Pretty sure that 3M is doing okay. They made about $4B last year and  have been profitable for a while.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie Schreiber</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/corporate-identity-adapts-to-new-economic-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-1076251</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie Schreiber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=194822#comment-1076251</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Logo appropriation is going to to happen. &lt;/em&gt;

Logo parodies are usually considered fair use. The exception is when you are using the parody to compete with the owner of the logo, like putting that Nike squiggle on a tshirt or a hat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Logo appropriation is going to to happen. </em></p>
<p>Logo parodies are usually considered fair use. The exception is when you are using the parody to compete with the owner of the logo, like putting that Nike squiggle on a tshirt or a hat.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook User</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/corporate-identity-adapts-to-new-economic-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-1075042</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=194822#comment-1075042</guid>
		<description>Cute, I&#039;d say Xerox is the most clever.  Also thanks to psarhjinian for the link.  I hadn&#039;t seen that poster before.  That was real funny and would have a very positive influence on me if I saw it in any car salesmans cubicle/office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Cute, I&#8217;d say Xerox is the most clever.  Also thanks to psarhjinian for the link.  I hadn&#8217;t seen that poster before.  That was real funny and would have a very positive influence on me if I saw it in any car salesmans cubicle/office.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ayoub</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/corporate-identity-adapts-to-new-economic-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-1074832</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ayoub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=194822#comment-1074832</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->That&#8217;s great.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lewissalem</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/corporate-identity-adapts-to-new-economic-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-1073602</link>
		<dc:creator>lewissalem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=194822#comment-1073602</guid>
		<description>McDonald&#039;s is doing quite well right now, actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->McDonald&#8217;s is doing quite well right now, actually.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psarhjinian</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/corporate-identity-adapts-to-new-economic-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-1073551</link>
		<dc:creator>psarhjinian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=194822#comment-1073551</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;My fave: The faded “XEROX” logo.&lt;/em&gt;

Agreed.  The test are standard fare, but the Xerox one is actually witty.

Logo appropriation is going to to happen.  It has been happening since Adbusters debuted.  The worst possible response would be to throw lawyers at the problem, but I wouldn&#039;t put it past a few of the, ahem, storied marques above.

Side story: I&#039;m out minivan-shopping this weekend and, after being more than a little annoyed at my local Toyota dealer, I drop by the Mazda store.  In the salesperson&#039;s office is a printed version of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3181/3099247596_533fc99242.jpg?v=0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Our shitty cars&quot;&lt;/a&gt; faux poster that&#039;s been going around.

Yes, I know Mazda is part owned by Ford.  Yes, I know it&#039;s crass.  It was also funny, and more than little bold for the usual milquetoast car dealer humour.  It was certainly better than the spiel I got from the good ol&#039;boy at Toyota about how he didn&#039;t need to discount products because he wasn&#039;t selling domestics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>My fave: The faded “XEROX” logo.</em></p>
<p>Agreed.  The test are standard fare, but the Xerox one is actually witty.</p>
<p>Logo appropriation is going to to happen.  It has been happening since Adbusters debuted.  The worst possible response would be to throw lawyers at the problem, but I wouldn&#8217;t put it past a few of the, ahem, storied marques above.</p>
<p>Side story: I&#8217;m out minivan-shopping this weekend and, after being more than a little annoyed at my local Toyota dealer, I drop by the Mazda store.  In the salesperson&#8217;s office is a printed version of the <a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3181/3099247596_533fc99242.jpg?v=0" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Our shitty cars&#8221;</a> faux poster that&#8217;s been going around.</p>
<p>Yes, I know Mazda is part owned by Ford.  Yes, I know it&#8217;s crass.  It was also funny, and more than little bold for the usual milquetoast car dealer humour.  It was certainly better than the spiel I got from the good ol&#8217;boy at Toyota about how he didn&#8217;t need to discount products because he wasn&#8217;t selling domestics.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Chen</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/corporate-identity-adapts-to-new-economic-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-1073531</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Chen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=194822#comment-1073531</guid>
		<description>@Bertel: for more fun, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Reddit&lt;/a&gt; has more pictures/entries per page than Digg and sometimes has very different content due to voting vs. moderation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@Bertel: for more fun, <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/" rel="nofollow">Reddit</a> has more pictures/entries per page than Digg and sometimes has very different content due to voting vs. moderation<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedStapler</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/corporate-identity-adapts-to-new-economic-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-1073461</link>
		<dc:creator>RedStapler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=194822#comment-1073461</guid>
		<description>Nice. 

Now they just need to have the Dell logo catching fire as its battery pack self immolates in an epic fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Nice. </p>
<p>Now they just need to have the Dell logo catching fire as its battery pack self immolates in an epic fail.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaker</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/corporate-identity-adapts-to-new-economic-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-1073441</link>
		<dc:creator>shaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=194822#comment-1073441</guid>
		<description>My fave: The faded &quot;XEROX&quot; logo.

&quot;2M&quot; is pretty good, too. I&#039;m willing to bet that the missing &quot;M&quot; would be &quot;Manufacturing&quot; (unfortunately).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->My fave: The faded &#8220;XEROX&#8221; logo.</p>
<p>&#8220;2M&#8221; is pretty good, too. I&#8217;m willing to bet that the missing &#8220;M&#8221; would be &#8220;Manufacturing&#8221; (unfortunately).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 32/71 queries in 0.110 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 03:25:58 -->