Review: 2008 Dodge Charger V6 vs. 1993 Toyota Camry

Recent Comments

• Re: Review: Lincoln MKS Ecoboost Take Two
  
  Michael Karesh - I don’t think Ford tooled up for the V8s until after they’d passed through their darkest hours. They were shelved for quite a while. But,...
• Re: The Truth About JD Power’s 2010 Vehicle Dependability Survey
  
  littlehulkster - Another thing people forget about JD Power is that squeaky brakes or interior rattles are weighed exactly the same as...
• Re: Quote Of The Day: The State Of Hummer Edition
  
  wmba - To the person who chromed this monstrosity, I would say on a purely personal basis: “Sir, if not for extremely bad taste, you would have no taste...
• Re: Quote Of The Day: The State Of Hummer Edition
  
  Rob Finfrock - This brand needs to die. Utterly. And salt the Earth upon which it once grew.
• Re: Review: Lincoln MKS Ecoboost Take Two
  
  srogers - You’re right – $14k and 1500lb lighter (but still gotta be AWD).
• Re: NUMMI Workers OK Severance Deal
  
  50merc - If you read the San Jose paper’s article, you’ll learn the bye-bye pay is structured as “retention” pay worth $285 a day. That’s a...
• Re: Review: Lincoln MKS Ecoboost Take Two
  
  catbert430 - I had been seeing the MKS in pictures and on TV commercials and thought that it was a really attractive car. I finally saw one in the flesh. I was in my...
• Re: What’s Wrong With This Picture: Tuning Hits Bottom At Bodensee Edition
  
  JimothyLite - Yeah, okay, all that, but it probably gets really good mileage.
• Re: Review: Lincoln MKS Ecoboost Take Two
  
  N8iveVA - you’re missing the point. Why buy an A6 instead of a Passat? Why buy an ES350 over a Camry? you’re buy into a “luxury” brand
• Re: February Sales Snapshot: Truck Month Headed For A Letdown?
  
  mtr2car1 - I think this is one part of the market that Ford knows they can go in for the kill – they’ve upped their monthly and year...