<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chrysler Fought Reality And Reality Lost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-fought-reality-and-reality-lost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-fought-reality-and-reality-lost/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:07:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ingvar</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-fought-reality-and-reality-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-960932</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingvar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=155472#comment-960932</guid>
		<description>The evidence of 200+ death watches are finally sinking in. The more time that passes, the more people are discovering: &quot;Those guys at TTAC wasn&#039;t that bad after all.&quot; To me, it seems that other media speaks more respectfully of TTAC. Perhaps I&#039;m wrong? I don&#039;t know, but that is the impression I get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The evidence of 200+ death watches are finally sinking in. The more time that passes, the more people are discovering: &#8220;Those guys at TTAC wasn&#8217;t that bad after all.&#8221; To me, it seems that other media speaks more respectfully of TTAC. Perhaps I&#8217;m wrong? I don&#8217;t know, but that is the impression I get.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SexCpotatoes</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-fought-reality-and-reality-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-960791</link>
		<dc:creator>SexCpotatoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=155472#comment-960791</guid>
		<description>Woohoo, Wired called you &quot;curmudgeons,&quot; and we got called &quot;denizens&quot; by Daniel Neil.

The explanation does seem to be reasonable, but I smell a T-shirt opportunity.

&quot;Curmudgeons and denizens UNITE! @ thetruthaboutcars.com&quot;  or something of that nature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Woohoo, Wired called you &#8220;curmudgeons,&#8221; and we got called &#8220;denizens&#8221; by Daniel Neil.</p>
<p>The explanation does seem to be reasonable, but I smell a T-shirt opportunity.</p>
<p>&#8220;Curmudgeons and denizens UNITE! @ thetruthaboutcars.com&#8221;  or something of that nature.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benders</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-fought-reality-and-reality-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-960611</link>
		<dc:creator>benders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=155472#comment-960611</guid>
		<description>So...the EV is faster off the line (more torque, lighter) but the Challenger is the one spinning it&#039;s tires?

brush: The problem with the Redox battery is low energy density.  It&#039;s about half that of NiMH batteries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->So&#8230;the EV is faster off the line (more torque, lighter) but the Challenger is the one spinning it&#8217;s tires?</p>
<p>brush: The problem with the Redox battery is low energy density.  It&#8217;s about half that of NiMH batteries.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strippo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-fought-reality-and-reality-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-960372</link>
		<dc:creator>Strippo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=155472#comment-960372</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Xler&lt;/em&gt;

Sacrilege!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Xler</em></p>
<p>Sacrilege!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danielneil</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-fought-reality-and-reality-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-960271</link>
		<dc:creator>danielneil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=155472#comment-960271</guid>
		<description>Hello guys,

Dan Neil here. Thanks for TTAC for the notice, but wanted to clarify the events here. Xler rolled out its three electron buggies for a low-speed flog for some journalists at the Rose Bowl. At the end of the day, boys being boys, Lou Rhodes hopped in the Dodge EV -- which is lighter and more powerful than the stock Lotus Europa, btw -- and lined up against a Challenger, on a shortish run, certainly not a quarter mile. I&#039;m guessing 800-900 feet. The whole time we&#039;re a bit frantic to get off a couple of runs before the Rose Bowl Gestapo could stop us. Anywho, the Dodge EV with 100 percent traction and 100 percent torque off the line, easily moves off against the Challenger, which spins pretty fierce-like on the low-mu surface of the Rose Bowl parking lot. First run, the Challenger smokes in the hole, in FIRST gear, collects itself and is gaining ground toward the end. Second run, either the engineer lets off or he spins the wheels well and truly in 2nd, hitting the rev limiter and bogging down. The latter version is what the Xler engineer says, tho from the outside it sort of seemed like he let up. Hard to tell, really.

Now, let there be no doubt, the Dodge EV is wayyy quicker off the line, as you&#039;d expect for a lightweight sports car with a lightning bolt up its ass. However, on a proper quarter-mile, the Challenger would inevitably catch the Dodge EV, for no other reason than for the EV&#039;s single gearing.

There&#039;s no bad faith, no chicanery, just a couple of hasty runs in a parking lot to demonstrate that, you know, a little electric sports car get get off the bolt quick.

PS: after the two runs, the batteries and motor were nice and cool.

Thanks for caring, and all best to TTAC denizens.

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Hello guys,</p>
<p>Dan Neil here. Thanks for TTAC for the notice, but wanted to clarify the events here. Xler rolled out its three electron buggies for a low-speed flog for some journalists at the Rose Bowl. At the end of the day, boys being boys, Lou Rhodes hopped in the Dodge EV &#8212; which is lighter and more powerful than the stock Lotus Europa, btw &#8212; and lined up against a Challenger, on a shortish run, certainly not a quarter mile. I&#8217;m guessing 800-900 feet. The whole time we&#8217;re a bit frantic to get off a couple of runs before the Rose Bowl Gestapo could stop us. Anywho, the Dodge EV with 100 percent traction and 100 percent torque off the line, easily moves off against the Challenger, which spins pretty fierce-like on the low-mu surface of the Rose Bowl parking lot. First run, the Challenger smokes in the hole, in FIRST gear, collects itself and is gaining ground toward the end. Second run, either the engineer lets off or he spins the wheels well and truly in 2nd, hitting the rev limiter and bogging down. The latter version is what the Xler engineer says, tho from the outside it sort of seemed like he let up. Hard to tell, really.</p>
<p>Now, let there be no doubt, the Dodge EV is wayyy quicker off the line, as you&#8217;d expect for a lightweight sports car with a lightning bolt up its ass. However, on a proper quarter-mile, the Challenger would inevitably catch the Dodge EV, for no other reason than for the EV&#8217;s single gearing.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no bad faith, no chicanery, just a couple of hasty runs in a parking lot to demonstrate that, you know, a little electric sports car get get off the bolt quick.</p>
<p>PS: after the two runs, the batteries and motor were nice and cool.</p>
<p>Thanks for caring, and all best to TTAC denizens.</p>
<p>Dan<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-fought-reality-and-reality-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-960212</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=155472#comment-960212</guid>
		<description>Man... It looks like they&#039;re trying to hide the evidence.  Compare the photo at the bottom of the Wired article with &lt;a href=&quot;http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2247/2882152495_9722f4fe2d_o.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;lightbox[155472]&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Man&#8230; It looks like they&#8217;re trying to hide the evidence.  Compare the photo at the bottom of the Wired article with <a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2247/2882152495_9722f4fe2d_o.jpg" rel="lightbox[155472]" rel="nofollow">this one</a>.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benders</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-fought-reality-and-reality-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-960181</link>
		<dc:creator>benders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=155472#comment-960181</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/cars/2008/11/video-dodge-ev.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;

You guys made Wired&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><a href="http://blog.wired.com/cars/2008/11/video-dodge-ev.html" rel="nofollow"></p>
<p>You guys made Wired</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-fought-reality-and-reality-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-960142</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=155472#comment-960142</guid>
		<description>The only thing Chrysler about the DodgeEV is the paint job.  It&#039;s just a converted Lotus Europa with a motor by UQM.  I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if UQM was contracted to do the conversion for them.  Not that there&#039;s anything wrong with that, per se.  But to claim this is a product of Chrysler engineering feels dishonest and just a stunt for a bailout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The only thing Chrysler about the DodgeEV is the paint job.  It&#8217;s just a converted Lotus Europa with a motor by UQM.  I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if UQM was contracted to do the conversion for them.  Not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with that, per se.  But to claim this is a product of Chrysler engineering feels dishonest and just a stunt for a bailout.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brush</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-fought-reality-and-reality-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-959882</link>
		<dc:creator>brush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=155472#comment-959882</guid>
		<description>cmus,

Here&#039;s your battery technology 

http://www.zulenet.com/electriceco/sustainable_electricity.html

Instant recharge at a &quot;fuel&quot; station, non volatile fluids, no expensive storage infrastructures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->cmus,</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s your battery technology </p>
<p><a href="http://www.zulenet.com/electriceco/sustainable_electricity.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.zulenet.com/electriceco/sustainable_electricity.html</a></p>
<p>Instant recharge at a &#8220;fuel&#8221; station, non volatile fluids, no expensive storage infrastructures.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmus</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-fought-reality-and-reality-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-959851</link>
		<dc:creator>cmus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=155472#comment-959851</guid>
		<description>mmmm...Challenger. (nice pic on this article)

oh, right, sorry.

The video was stupid.  Most likely, it was the ENVI folks cooking this up on their own.  Chrysler PR folks probably making many of the same comments we are.

EV&#039;s cool.  I&#039;ll be happy to get one in 10 years when the battery/power systems have progressed enough to make a Challenger EV practical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->mmmm&#8230;Challenger. (nice pic on this article)</p>
<p>oh, right, sorry.</p>
<p>The video was stupid.  Most likely, it was the ENVI folks cooking this up on their own.  Chrysler PR folks probably making many of the same comments we are.</p>
<p>EV&#8217;s cool.  I&#8217;ll be happy to get one in 10 years when the battery/power systems have progressed enough to make a Challenger EV practical.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seoultrain</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-fought-reality-and-reality-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-959322</link>
		<dc:creator>seoultrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=155472#comment-959322</guid>
		<description>Why use a challenger? Do they enjoy showing up their own products? I&#039;d have done a slalom against a Mustang. That would have been legitimate &lt;em&gt;and &lt;/em&gt;comical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Why use a challenger? Do they enjoy showing up their own products? I&#8217;d have done a slalom against a Mustang. That would have been legitimate <em>and </em>comical.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueBrat</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-fought-reality-and-reality-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-959272</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueBrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=155472#comment-959272</guid>
		<description>This is ridiculous. Launched in 2nd gear? Just because your company is heading down the toilet doesn&#039;t mean you need to stoop to being craptastic along the way. At least go out with some dignity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->This is ridiculous. Launched in 2nd gear? Just because your company is heading down the toilet doesn&#8217;t mean you need to stoop to being craptastic along the way. At least go out with some dignity.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dushenski</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-fought-reality-and-reality-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-959202</link>
		<dc:creator>dushenski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=155472#comment-959202</guid>
		<description>A proper PR demo would have been on a twisty track where the EV&#039;s Lotus engineering would leave the Challenger in the dust. Obviously only one or two laps could be done because the EV would run out of juice. Which oddly reminds me of Chrysler in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->A proper PR demo would have been on a twisty track where the EV&#8217;s Lotus engineering would leave the Challenger in the dust. Obviously only one or two laps could be done because the EV would run out of juice. Which oddly reminds me of Chrysler in general.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 31/90 queries in 0.073 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 18:10:21 -->