<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chrysler Counting Its Quality Chickens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:17:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geotpf</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-746331</link>
		<dc:creator>Geotpf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-746331</guid>
		<description>tony-e30-Yeah, you might have a point.  One way to lower warranty costs is to deny a bunch of claims for warranty repairs.  That just pisses people off, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->tony-e30-Yeah, you might have a point.  One way to lower warranty costs is to deny a bunch of claims for warranty repairs.  That just pisses people off, of course.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony-e30</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-746231</link>
		<dc:creator>tony-e30</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-746231</guid>
		<description>As there is a reaction for every action, it seems quite likely that this will require dealers to tighten up their standards for what is deemed a warranty repair/replace.  I&#039;m not quite sure who sets that standard, actually, so perhaps it will be Chrysler changing the standard?  Either way, the dealership repair experience for customers is not likely to improve.  This will be interesting to keep an eye on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->As there is a reaction for every action, it seems quite likely that this will require dealers to tighten up their standards for what is deemed a warranty repair/replace.  I&#8217;m not quite sure who sets that standard, actually, so perhaps it will be Chrysler changing the standard?  Either way, the dealership repair experience for customers is not likely to improve.  This will be interesting to keep an eye on.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: y2kdcar</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-746092</link>
		<dc:creator>y2kdcar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-746092</guid>
		<description>Pig_Iron : 
&lt;em&gt;This whole situation pains me to no end. Chrysler had the most potential of the bunch. I fear they are now past the point of no return. ...&lt;/em&gt;

I hope you&#039;re wrong about Chrysler being past the point of no return, because I&#039;ve always had a warm spot in my heart for the company and its products.  The full-size Plymouths that my dad owned when I was growing up were better handlers than the comparable Ford and GM cars of the day and had a unique style and character.  Even some of the later Mopars from the K-car era and beyond were distinctive.  While this wasn&#039;t always good (Chrysler&#039;s TC by Maserati, anyone?), it did make for a more interesting and competitive auto market.  I hope the company stays alive long enough to address the weaknesses in its product line and show some of its old-time creativity and audacity again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Pig_Iron :<br />
<em>This whole situation pains me to no end. Chrysler had the most potential of the bunch. I fear they are now past the point of no return. &#8230;</em></p>
<p>I hope you&#8217;re wrong about Chrysler being past the point of no return, because I&#8217;ve always had a warm spot in my heart for the company and its products.  The full-size Plymouths that my dad owned when I was growing up were better handlers than the comparable Ford and GM cars of the day and had a unique style and character.  Even some of the later Mopars from the K-car era and beyond were distinctive.  While this wasn&#8217;t always good (Chrysler&#8217;s TC by Maserati, anyone?), it did make for a more interesting and competitive auto market.  I hope the company stays alive long enough to address the weaknesses in its product line and show some of its old-time creativity and audacity again.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geotpf</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-745632</link>
		<dc:creator>Geotpf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-745632</guid>
		<description>Pig_Iron-I agree with jaje that Chrysler is the weakest of the Detroit Three.  They are the smallest of the Three, have the weakest domestic product line, and have extremely minimal overseas business to fall back on.  By all rights, they should collapse first (and save Ford and GM in the process-they people (and companies, such as rental car agencies) who buy Chrysler products will still purchase vehicles from somebody, and Toyota and Honda don&#039;t have enough spare production capacity to make up for all the unfilled Chrysler demand).

As for the specific article, warranty claims &lt;strong&gt;are&lt;/strong&gt;, in fact, a good indication of quality, even beyond the warranty period.  If they really have decreased their warranty costs, that is a good sign for Chrysler&#039;s future.  Of course, the current private nature of Chrysler means they could basically just make shit up and nobody would be the wiser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Pig_Iron-I agree with jaje that Chrysler is the weakest of the Detroit Three.  They are the smallest of the Three, have the weakest domestic product line, and have extremely minimal overseas business to fall back on.  By all rights, they should collapse first (and save Ford and GM in the process-they people (and companies, such as rental car agencies) who buy Chrysler products will still purchase vehicles from somebody, and Toyota and Honda don&#8217;t have enough spare production capacity to make up for all the unfilled Chrysler demand).</p>
<p>As for the specific article, warranty claims <strong>are</strong>, in fact, a good indication of quality, even beyond the warranty period.  If they really have decreased their warranty costs, that is a good sign for Chrysler&#8217;s future.  Of course, the current private nature of Chrysler means they could basically just make shit up and nobody would be the wiser.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-745492</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-745492</guid>
		<description>My two Jeeps (&#039;04 and &#039;06) have been basically problem free. A couple of things were taken in and repaired under warranty, but they were minor and not really a build issue (radiator leaked in one case, the other, a rear diff was not sealed correctly, which were both supplier issues).

I&#039;ve been very happy with them and would buy from Chrysler again, but I&#039;m tired of the UAW and who they support. So my next car will be a non-union built Honda. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->My two Jeeps (&#8217;04 and &#8216;06) have been basically problem free. A couple of things were taken in and repaired under warranty, but they were minor and not really a build issue (radiator leaked in one case, the other, a rear diff was not sealed correctly, which were both supplier issues).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been very happy with them and would buy from Chrysler again, but I&#8217;m tired of the UAW and who they support. So my next car will be a non-union built Honda. :)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mel23</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-745302</link>
		<dc:creator>mel23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-745302</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Fer cryin’ out loud. Cerberus will never win a Corporate Goody-2-Shoes Award. But your wording that Cerberus “had gotten out of Mervyn’s before the filing” means that some financially retarded firm / individuals purchased Mervyn’s from Cerberus.&lt;/b&gt;

Uh, yeah. I suppose what Cerberus did was not in violation of any criminal statutes, and the civil case will go however it goes. But IMO, stripping a going business and destroying hundreds of jobs and screwing up people&#039;s lives is wrong. Legal, but wrong. Nothing personal in this, but this is what comes to my mind when I hear complaints about greedy union types.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><b>Fer cryin’ out loud. Cerberus will never win a Corporate Goody-2-Shoes Award. But your wording that Cerberus “had gotten out of Mervyn’s before the filing” means that some financially retarded firm / individuals purchased Mervyn’s from Cerberus.</b></p>
<p>Uh, yeah. I suppose what Cerberus did was not in violation of any criminal statutes, and the civil case will go however it goes. But IMO, stripping a going business and destroying hundreds of jobs and screwing up people&#8217;s lives is wrong. Legal, but wrong. Nothing personal in this, but this is what comes to my mind when I hear complaints about greedy union types.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1996MEdition</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-745232</link>
		<dc:creator>1996MEdition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-745232</guid>
		<description>Actually, Chrysler&#039;s method of forecasting their warranty based on early data is valid as long as it is based on proven statistical methods such as Weibull life analysis.  When used correctly and with uncertanty estimates included in the analysis, these conditions can be extremely accurate, although usually erring on the conservative side.  Sarbanes-Oxley requires warranty set-asides, or accruals, for public companies using proven forecasting methods.....Chrysler, however, is private and could be using unproven statistics in their forecasts....I guess time will tell.

Much of the cost of automotive warranty occurs early in the life cycle when companies pay 100%.  I am sure that if you look at the fine print, there are some pro-rate clauses in Chrysler&#039;s warranty based on age or mileage.  I myself have never looked, as I would never buy a Chrysler product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Actually, Chrysler&#8217;s method of forecasting their warranty based on early data is valid as long as it is based on proven statistical methods such as Weibull life analysis.  When used correctly and with uncertanty estimates included in the analysis, these conditions can be extremely accurate, although usually erring on the conservative side.  Sarbanes-Oxley requires warranty set-asides, or accruals, for public companies using proven forecasting methods&#8230;..Chrysler, however, is private and could be using unproven statistics in their forecasts&#8230;.I guess time will tell.</p>
<p>Much of the cost of automotive warranty occurs early in the life cycle when companies pay 100%.  I am sure that if you look at the fine print, there are some pro-rate clauses in Chrysler&#8217;s warranty based on age or mileage.  I myself have never looked, as I would never buy a Chrysler product.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jurisb</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-745211</link>
		<dc:creator>jurisb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-745211</guid>
		<description>Why instead of shouting we can, you admit that you can`t manufacture sophisticated mechanisims for car industry on par with germans or japanese and ask for help? Is dying proud better than surviving humble? go to Japanese ask for the answers, and you will end up calling them racists.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Why instead of shouting we can, you admit that you can`t manufacture sophisticated mechanisims for car industry on par with germans or japanese and ask for help? Is dying proud better than surviving humble? go to Japanese ask for the answers, and you will end up calling them racists&#8230;&#8230;.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-744892</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-744892</guid>
		<description>Usta Bee and KixStart,

It is isn&#039;t it??  You made me laugh too.

jaje,

I have always considered them basement dwellers too.

In my opinion the American automobile market would be better off without Chrysler.  I wish an auto maker that has a quality standard would buy Jeep.  Then turn it back into the nitch product it was meant to be.

Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Usta Bee and KixStart,</p>
<p>It is isn&#8217;t it??  You made me laugh too.</p>
<p>jaje,</p>
<p>I have always considered them basement dwellers too.</p>
<p>In my opinion the American automobile market would be better off without Chrysler.  I wish an auto maker that has a quality standard would buy Jeep.  Then turn it back into the nitch product it was meant to be.</p>
<p>Ryan<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KixStart</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-744561</link>
		<dc:creator>KixStart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-744561</guid>
		<description>usta bee, That&#039;s cruel.  But very funny.

---

What Chrysler is doing by cutting the allowance for warranty work makes the operation look more profitable in the short-term.  If they actually have improved the quality, then this all works out OK.  If they haven&#039;t, they&#039;ll be booking additional expenses down the road... but tomorrow gets to take care of itself in Detroit, I think.  This is a lot like all of GM&#039;s unfunded liabilities.

---

It also occurs to me that Chrysler has lately been stiffing their suppliers.  Are they also extremely slow-pay or creatively no-pay to the dealers for warranty work?  If the dealers are getting stiffed, that would lead to them straight-arming the customer, too, wouldn&#039;t it?  Such a strategy would reduce warranty claims.  But it&#039;s another tactic that has adverse strategic implications.

---

And the real expense and value of that &quot;lifetime&quot; warranty have yet to be judged.  In the short term, no problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->usta bee, That&#8217;s cruel.  But very funny.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>What Chrysler is doing by cutting the allowance for warranty work makes the operation look more profitable in the short-term.  If they actually have improved the quality, then this all works out OK.  If they haven&#8217;t, they&#8217;ll be booking additional expenses down the road&#8230; but tomorrow gets to take care of itself in Detroit, I think.  This is a lot like all of GM&#8217;s unfunded liabilities.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>It also occurs to me that Chrysler has lately been stiffing their suppliers.  Are they also extremely slow-pay or creatively no-pay to the dealers for warranty work?  If the dealers are getting stiffed, that would lead to them straight-arming the customer, too, wouldn&#8217;t it?  Such a strategy would reduce warranty claims.  But it&#8217;s another tactic that has adverse strategic implications.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>And the real expense and value of that &#8220;lifetime&#8221; warranty have yet to be judged.  In the short term, no problem.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Usta Bee</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-744551</link>
		<dc:creator>Usta Bee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 04:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-744551</guid>
		<description>&quot;9 out of 10 new Chryslers registered over the last 10 years are still on the road&quot;

....STRANDED on the road.
The 1 remaining car actually made it home. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8220;9 out of 10 new Chryslers registered over the last 10 years are still on the road&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;.STRANDED on the road.<br />
The 1 remaining car actually made it home. ;)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nemphre</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-744401</link>
		<dc:creator>Nemphre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 02:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-744401</guid>
		<description>What a great advertisement.  Not for Chrysler mind you, but for all of their competitors.  It&#039;s good for a hearty laugh as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->What a great advertisement.  Not for Chrysler mind you, but for all of their competitors.  It&#8217;s good for a hearty laugh as well.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedStapler</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-744391</link>
		<dc:creator>RedStapler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 02:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-744391</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had a window regulator and turbo fixed under warranty on my Jeep Liberty (KJ) CRD.   

Aside from the dealer taking a half day over their time line on the turbo I&#039;ve been pleased with their honoring the warranty. 

Now the people who fell for the &quot;lifetime&quot; power train warranty are SOL.  Its going to be the lifetime of Chrysler, not the vehicle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;ve had a window regulator and turbo fixed under warranty on my Jeep Liberty (KJ) CRD.   </p>
<p>Aside from the dealer taking a half day over their time line on the turbo I&#8217;ve been pleased with their honoring the warranty. </p>
<p>Now the people who fell for the &#8220;lifetime&#8221; power train warranty are SOL.  Its going to be the lifetime of Chrysler, not the vehicle.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ihatetrees</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-744192</link>
		<dc:creator>ihatetrees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-744192</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;mel23:
At the time of the Mervyn’s filing, the WSJ noted that Cerberus had acquired the retailing operation separately from the real estate, had rented the real estate to Mervyn’s, had sold some of the real estate, and had gotten out of Mervyn’s before the filing, and the whole thing was profitable for Cerberus. The article today notes that Mervyn’s is suing Cerberus charging that Cerberus stripped Mervyn’s.&lt;/i&gt;

Fer cryin&#039; out loud. Cerberus will never win a Corporate Goody-2-Shoes Award. But your wording that Cerberus &quot;had gotten out of Mervyn&#039;s before the filing&quot; means that some &lt;strike&gt;financially retarded&lt;/strike&gt; firm / individuals purchased Mervyn&#039;s from Cerberus.

My guess: Some buyer didn&#039;t do due diligence in the midst of the credit bubble and is now bleating his/her way to a judge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><i>mel23:<br />
At the time of the Mervyn’s filing, the WSJ noted that Cerberus had acquired the retailing operation separately from the real estate, had rented the real estate to Mervyn’s, had sold some of the real estate, and had gotten out of Mervyn’s before the filing, and the whole thing was profitable for Cerberus. The article today notes that Mervyn’s is suing Cerberus charging that Cerberus stripped Mervyn’s.</i></p>
<p>Fer cryin&#8217; out loud. Cerberus will never win a Corporate Goody-2-Shoes Award. But your wording that Cerberus &#8220;had gotten out of Mervyn&#8217;s before the filing&#8221; means that some <strike>financially retarded</strike> firm / individuals purchased Mervyn&#8217;s from Cerberus.</p>
<p>My guess: Some buyer didn&#8217;t do due diligence in the midst of the credit bubble and is now bleating his/her way to a judge.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yasth</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-744111</link>
		<dc:creator>yasth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-744111</guid>
		<description>Eh, there doesn&#039;t seem to be a federal law requiring sane escrow limits. Normally it would get you red flagged in an audit, but they are privately held so no one would know. 

If Chrysler went bankrupt... eh the matter gets complicated, more or less you&#039;d have to get in line at bankruptcy court with a bunch of other people. It would probably be the largest dollar value failure of in effect warranties in the history of the US. Past precedent does not always apply in those situations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Eh, there doesn&#8217;t seem to be a federal law requiring sane escrow limits. Normally it would get you red flagged in an audit, but they are privately held so no one would know. </p>
<p>If Chrysler went bankrupt&#8230; eh the matter gets complicated, more or less you&#8217;d have to get in line at bankruptcy court with a bunch of other people. It would probably be the largest dollar value failure of in effect warranties in the history of the US. Past precedent does not always apply in those situations.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iNeon</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-744021</link>
		<dc:creator>iNeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-744021</guid>
		<description>Once, I bought a Dodge-- brought it in for warranty work, and the dealer basically repaired my car for free. 

That was the last time I had to set foot in a Dodge dealership for a mechanical fault. 2001, if I recall correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Once, I bought a Dodge&#8211; brought it in for warranty work, and the dealer basically repaired my car for free. </p>
<p>That was the last time I had to set foot in a Dodge dealership for a mechanical fault. 2001, if I recall correctly.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SherbornSean</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-743982</link>
		<dc:creator>SherbornSean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-743982</guid>
		<description>I once brought in my Dodge for warranty work.  The dealer basically told me he didn&#039;t see any problems and refused to do any work on the car without charging me.  

That was the last time I set foot in a Chrysler dealer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I once brought in my Dodge for warranty work.  The dealer basically told me he didn&#8217;t see any problems and refused to do any work on the car without charging me.  </p>
<p>That was the last time I set foot in a Chrysler dealer.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaje</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-743952</link>
		<dc:creator>jaje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-743952</guid>
		<description>Funny - I&#039;ve always considered Chrysler to be the first to go...and really should as they have really nothing and I doubt they can sell a car at or even close to their MSRP (sans Viper).  If you look at their sales they are cresting 50% total sales directly to fleets meaning their 1,000s of dealers sell even less retail (and many dealers now a days deal highly in fleets and are now focusing less on &quot;new&quot; cars but on CPO - including non Chrysler vehicles! - where they can actually make some money.

None of their cars or trucks are competitive except only when it comes down to the deal you can get.  In addition to their products being in also ran / or ranked last status, hardly any of their cars are above average in the major reliability studies.

Chrysler&#039;s time has come and gone long ago.  In the overall markets&#039; scheme of things they should have never been bailed out back then.  GM &amp; Ford would have conquested almost all of their sales, network, etc. as they had the capacity and reputation (and back then Toyota or Honda still were small boutiques and had no manufacturing presence).  Time and time again Gov&#039;t interference does not work well and the market needs to adjust itself by weeding out the weak so the strong can survive.  Bankruptcy is required to reinvent companies that are stronger - but we&#039;ll undoubtedly throw money into Waggy&#039;s bank account and he&#039;ll still lead the charge and never set a tone for true recovery - just staving off the inevitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Funny &#8211; I&#8217;ve always considered Chrysler to be the first to go&#8230;and really should as they have really nothing and I doubt they can sell a car at or even close to their MSRP (sans Viper).  If you look at their sales they are cresting 50% total sales directly to fleets meaning their 1,000s of dealers sell even less retail (and many dealers now a days deal highly in fleets and are now focusing less on &#8220;new&#8221; cars but on CPO &#8211; including non Chrysler vehicles! &#8211; where they can actually make some money.</p>
<p>None of their cars or trucks are competitive except only when it comes down to the deal you can get.  In addition to their products being in also ran / or ranked last status, hardly any of their cars are above average in the major reliability studies.</p>
<p>Chrysler&#8217;s time has come and gone long ago.  In the overall markets&#8217; scheme of things they should have never been bailed out back then.  GM &amp; Ford would have conquested almost all of their sales, network, etc. as they had the capacity and reputation (and back then Toyota or Honda still were small boutiques and had no manufacturing presence).  Time and time again Gov&#8217;t interference does not work well and the market needs to adjust itself by weeding out the weak so the strong can survive.  Bankruptcy is required to reinvent companies that are stronger &#8211; but we&#8217;ll undoubtedly throw money into Waggy&#8217;s bank account and he&#8217;ll still lead the charge and never set a tone for true recovery &#8211; just staving off the inevitable.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mel23</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-743811</link>
		<dc:creator>mel23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-743811</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s an interesting, and unsurprising, item in the WSJ today regarding Cerberus. Recall that Mervyn&#039;s filed bankruptcy recently, and that Mervyn&#039;s was acquired by Cerberus from Target in 2004. At the time of the Mervyn&#039;s filing, the WSJ noted that Cerberus had acquired the retailing operation separately from the real estate, had rented the real estate to Mervyn&#039;s, had sold some of the real estate, and had gotten out of Mervyn&#039;s before the filing, and the whole thing was profitable for Cerberus. The article today notes that Mervyn&#039;s is suing Cerberus charging that Cerberus stripped Mervyn&#039;s. Cerberus nearly doubled the rent charged to Mervyn&#039;s the occupant, charged them a special dividend, and preventing the closing of unprofitable stores. Of course there&#039;s no way of knowing the fate of Mervyn&#039;s without being acquired by Cerberus, but we know that 26 stores will be closed and about 1,700 people will be fired as things stand. 

I don&#039;t have any idea how they thought they&#039;d be able to strip and flip Chrysler or GMAC, and it seems increasingly unlikely they&#039;ll escape without taking a big time bath. These parasitic bastards are all over the place with their financial &#039;instruments&#039;. 

Looking at the largest share holders of Ford and GM shows considerable overlap. Thus these outfits that have supported/permitted the dismal performance of these companies stand to get doubly rewarded by a bailout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->There&#8217;s an interesting, and unsurprising, item in the WSJ today regarding Cerberus. Recall that Mervyn&#8217;s filed bankruptcy recently, and that Mervyn&#8217;s was acquired by Cerberus from Target in 2004. At the time of the Mervyn&#8217;s filing, the WSJ noted that Cerberus had acquired the retailing operation separately from the real estate, had rented the real estate to Mervyn&#8217;s, had sold some of the real estate, and had gotten out of Mervyn&#8217;s before the filing, and the whole thing was profitable for Cerberus. The article today notes that Mervyn&#8217;s is suing Cerberus charging that Cerberus stripped Mervyn&#8217;s. Cerberus nearly doubled the rent charged to Mervyn&#8217;s the occupant, charged them a special dividend, and preventing the closing of unprofitable stores. Of course there&#8217;s no way of knowing the fate of Mervyn&#8217;s without being acquired by Cerberus, but we know that 26 stores will be closed and about 1,700 people will be fired as things stand. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have any idea how they thought they&#8217;d be able to strip and flip Chrysler or GMAC, and it seems increasingly unlikely they&#8217;ll escape without taking a big time bath. These parasitic bastards are all over the place with their financial &#8216;instruments&#8217;. </p>
<p>Looking at the largest share holders of Ford and GM shows considerable overlap. Thus these outfits that have supported/permitted the dismal performance of these companies stand to get doubly rewarded by a bailout.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yankinwaoz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-743692</link>
		<dc:creator>yankinwaoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-743692</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious. Are there US laws that require companies to maintain funds to honor warranties? Common sense would indicate that is smart to do. But this is the Detroit 2.8 we&#039;re talking about.

In other words: Can they plan to pay any claims only from future revenue? If so, then it seems a desperate company would tap its warranty reserve fund to keep the lights on.

After all, they finance their other future obligations this way (healthcare, pension, etc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;m curious. Are there US laws that require companies to maintain funds to honor warranties? Common sense would indicate that is smart to do. But this is the Detroit 2.8 we&#8217;re talking about.</p>
<p>In other words: Can they plan to pay any claims only from future revenue? If so, then it seems a desperate company would tap its warranty reserve fund to keep the lights on.</p>
<p>After all, they finance their other future obligations this way (healthcare, pension, etc).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beetlebug</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-743672</link>
		<dc:creator>beetlebug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-743672</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great ad image there. Just to give credit where it&#039;s do http://fuselage.de/ is a great site for information on those big Mopars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->That&#8217;s a great ad image there. Just to give credit where it&#8217;s do <a href="http://fuselage.de/" rel="nofollow">http://fuselage.de/</a> is a great site for information on those big Mopars.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pig_Iron</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-counting-its-quality-chickens/comment-page-1/#comment-743602</link>
		<dc:creator>Pig_Iron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=70452#comment-743602</guid>
		<description>This whole situation pains me to no end. Chrysler had the most potential of the bunch. I fear they are now past the point of no return. 

The only good thing out of it, is that the good employees (floor &amp; tech) will wow their new employers with their resourcefulness, and the bad ones will have to learn to survive in the outside (non-auto) world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->This whole situation pains me to no end. Chrysler had the most potential of the bunch. I fear they are now past the point of no return. </p>
<p>The only good thing out of it, is that the good employees (floor &amp; tech) will wow their new employers with their resourcefulness, and the bad ones will have to learn to survive in the outside (non-auto) world.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 58/144 queries in 0.120 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 07:07:13 -->