<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chrysler Aims to Undercut Tahoe Hybrid Pricing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:47:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geotpf</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-522872</link>
		<dc:creator>Geotpf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 23:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/#comment-522872</guid>
		<description>The Detroit 3 keep missing the sweet spot for these things.  The two-mode, while advanced, is too expensive.  GM&#039;s belt alternator starter hybrid is too wimpy.  Toyota, as usual, gets it right-their Hybrid Synergy Drive is just right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The Detroit 3 keep missing the sweet spot for these things.  The two-mode, while advanced, is too expensive.  GM&#8217;s belt alternator starter hybrid is too wimpy.  Toyota, as usual, gets it right-their Hybrid Synergy Drive is just right.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KixStart</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-522202</link>
		<dc:creator>KixStart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/#comment-522202</guid>
		<description>Lumbergh21, I think the price difference hybrid to conventional, will be way more than $3500.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Lumbergh21, I think the price difference hybrid to conventional, will be way more than $3500.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bancho</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-522141</link>
		<dc:creator>Bancho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/#comment-522141</guid>
		<description>This is kind of sad but not much of s surprise at all. Given the success that GM has seen with their offering I don&#039;t expect people to be busting down the doors at the Dodge/Chrysler dealer to get their hands on these, especially given the current demand for the non hybrid versions of the Durango/Aspen.

It&#039;s going to be tough to develop any economy of scale with these hybrids if the domestics can&#039;t develop a unique model or apply the technology to a more mainstream vehicle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->This is kind of sad but not much of s surprise at all. Given the success that GM has seen with their offering I don&#8217;t expect people to be busting down the doors at the Dodge/Chrysler dealer to get their hands on these, especially given the current demand for the non hybrid versions of the Durango/Aspen.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to be tough to develop any economy of scale with these hybrids if the domestics can&#8217;t develop a unique model or apply the technology to a more mainstream vehicle.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Niedermeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-522112</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Niedermeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/#comment-522112</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Alex Rodriguez: I still don’t understand the thinking on why they feel they can only put the hybrid powertrain in their decked out top of the line vehicle.&lt;/em&gt; 

Simple: The two-mode drive costs about $10k to make. Since they can&#039;t ask that much for it, they have to subsidize it with the fat profit of a loaded vehicle. Same game GM plays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Alex Rodriguez: I still don’t understand the thinking on why they feel they can only put the hybrid powertrain in their decked out top of the line vehicle.</em> </p>
<p>Simple: The two-mode drive costs about $10k to make. Since they can&#8217;t ask that much for it, they have to subsidize it with the fat profit of a loaded vehicle. Same game GM plays.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook User</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-521712</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/#comment-521712</guid>
		<description>Assuming that I was going to buy one of these in the first place and assuming that the price difference was only $1,700 ($3,500-$1,800 back fromt he feds) and assuming that the mpg improvement truly is 25% overall, this would be a no brainer.  Perfect for most of the people buying a Chrysler SUV.

If I&#039;m driving 12,000 miles per year in a Durango, I&#039;m going to buy at least 750 gallons of gas.  A 25% mileage improvement will drop that number to 600 gallons for a savings of 150 gallons of gas.  At $5 per gallon, that $1,700 gets paid back in less than three years; plus while I doubt that the residual value of the mild hybrid Durango will be all that great, it will likely be better than the non-hybrid version.  Even if my investments could match the rise in gas prices over the next seven years (unlikely), the gas savings would still warrant putting $3,000 in cash into a hybrid drivetrain rather than investing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Assuming that I was going to buy one of these in the first place and assuming that the price difference was only $1,700 ($3,500-$1,800 back fromt he feds) and assuming that the mpg improvement truly is 25% overall, this would be a no brainer.  Perfect for most of the people buying a Chrysler SUV.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m driving 12,000 miles per year in a Durango, I&#8217;m going to buy at least 750 gallons of gas.  A 25% mileage improvement will drop that number to 600 gallons for a savings of 150 gallons of gas.  At $5 per gallon, that $1,700 gets paid back in less than three years; plus while I doubt that the residual value of the mild hybrid Durango will be all that great, it will likely be better than the non-hybrid version.  Even if my investments could match the rise in gas prices over the next seven years (unlikely), the gas savings would still warrant putting $3,000 in cash into a hybrid drivetrain rather than investing it.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carguy</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-521701</link>
		<dc:creator>carguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/#comment-521701</guid>
		<description>I guess the target market is anyone who fears neither stupendous depreciation nor average quality and is looking for a $45K Chrysler.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I guess the target market is anyone who fears neither stupendous depreciation nor average quality and is looking for a $45K Chrysler.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lprocter1982</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-521612</link>
		<dc:creator>lprocter1982</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/#comment-521612</guid>
		<description>I think I might get one of these vehicles... if someone paid me $50,000 or so. Otherwise, no. WHy would I want a crappy, gas sucking, poorly-made, unloveable, crappy, plastic cladded, crappy, ugly, unreliable vehicle? Did I mention they&#039;re crappy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I think I might get one of these vehicles&#8230; if someone paid me $50,000 or so. Otherwise, no. WHy would I want a crappy, gas sucking, poorly-made, unloveable, crappy, plastic cladded, crappy, ugly, unreliable vehicle? Did I mention they&#8217;re crappy?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hwyhobo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-521601</link>
		<dc:creator>hwyhobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/#comment-521601</guid>
		<description>Like GM&#039;s executives, Chrysler&#039;s also appear to have built their mansions in a la-la land far away from reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Like GM&#8217;s executives, Chrysler&#8217;s also appear to have built their mansions in a la-la land far away from reality.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Horner</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-521572</link>
		<dc:creator>John Horner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/#comment-521572</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Alex.  Perhaps shortages of batteries and/or other components means they just won&#039;t be able to build very many.  If so, then selling the highest profit version makes short-term sense.   

In the bad-old days new advanced technologies were released in high-end Cadillacs, Lincolns and such before trickling down to mid and low priced vehicles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I agree with you Alex.  Perhaps shortages of batteries and/or other components means they just won&#8217;t be able to build very many.  If so, then selling the highest profit version makes short-term sense.   </p>
<p>In the bad-old days new advanced technologies were released in high-end Cadillacs, Lincolns and such before trickling down to mid and low priced vehicles.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-521542</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/chrysler-aims-to-undercut-tahoe-hybrid-pricing/#comment-521542</guid>
		<description>Although they did learn something from the GM fiasco, they did not learn enough.  45K is still too high a price.  Better than 53K, but not low enough.  

I still don&#039;t understand the thinking on why they feel they can only put the hybrid powertrain in their decked out top of the line vehicle.  A Hybrid &quot;base&quot; model in the low to mid 30&#039;s, no nav, no back up sensor, no leather, no DVD, no 20&quot; wheels.  Just 17&quot;, A/C, Power windows and doors, and the hybrid and move some metal.  Probably would get better mileage as well if it wasn&#039;t loaded with options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Although they did learn something from the GM fiasco, they did not learn enough.  45K is still too high a price.  Better than 53K, but not low enough.  </p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t understand the thinking on why they feel they can only put the hybrid powertrain in their decked out top of the line vehicle.  A Hybrid &#8220;base&#8221; model in the low to mid 30&#8217;s, no nav, no back up sensor, no leather, no DVD, no 20&#8243; wheels.  Just 17&#8243;, A/C, Power windows and doors, and the hybrid and move some metal.  Probably would get better mileage as well if it wasn&#8217;t loaded with options.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 33/75 queries in 0.068 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 11:01:16 -->