<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CAW Turns its Guns on Struggling GM, Defenseless Chrysler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:17:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jthorner</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-405571</link>
		<dc:creator>jthorner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 02:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/#comment-405571</guid>
		<description>&quot; Does anyone else think Ford may have done their agreement with the CAW so early and with such favorable terms so as to push either GM or Chrysler into the abyss of C11?&quot;

I&#039;ve certainly been wondering if caving early is part of Mulally&#039;s master plan somehow.  He doesn&#039;t seem like the kind of guy who does things for no good reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8221; Does anyone else think Ford may have done their agreement with the CAW so early and with such favorable terms so as to push either GM or Chrysler into the abyss of C11?&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve certainly been wondering if caving early is part of Mulally&#8217;s master plan somehow.  He doesn&#8217;t seem like the kind of guy who does things for no good reason.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lichtronamo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-405252</link>
		<dc:creator>Lichtronamo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/#comment-405252</guid>
		<description>Chrysler is never coming back fro C11.  Carlos Ghosn will make off with Dodge trucks and Jeep leaving Chrysler cars to the Chinese or Indians.

If GM is to survive C11, the courts will have to install a CEO with Ghosn or Mulally&#039;s capabilities to walk into the big office and ask &quot;WTF is going on here?!&quot; Kill products, brands, dealers and please, oh, please Bob Lutz (or at least demote him to PR chief).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Chrysler is never coming back fro C11.  Carlos Ghosn will make off with Dodge trucks and Jeep leaving Chrysler cars to the Chinese or Indians.</p>
<p>If GM is to survive C11, the courts will have to install a CEO with Ghosn or Mulally&#8217;s capabilities to walk into the big office and ask &#8220;WTF is going on here?!&#8221; Kill products, brands, dealers and please, oh, please Bob Lutz (or at least demote him to PR chief).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Farago</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-405242</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Farago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/#comment-405242</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Lichtronamo: 

Ford is the one company of the Big 3 that can’t really go C11 because the Ford family’s wealth and control of the company would be wiped out. As such, with their renewal program taking hold and looking to pick up steam in 2009/2010 with new product, why not see if they can add the dead-man bounce too?&lt;/em&gt;

Not crazy at all. This is a game of Last Man Standing. If Chrysler and then GM go belly-up, the dead cat bounce will be HUGE.

Only one problem: a resurgent, post-C11 Chrysler or GM. Hmmm. Nah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Lichtronamo: </p>
<p>Ford is the one company of the Big 3 that can’t really go C11 because the Ford family’s wealth and control of the company would be wiped out. As such, with their renewal program taking hold and looking to pick up steam in 2009/2010 with new product, why not see if they can add the dead-man bounce too?</em></p>
<p>Not crazy at all. This is a game of Last Man Standing. If Chrysler and then GM go belly-up, the dead cat bounce will be HUGE.</p>
<p>Only one problem: a resurgent, post-C11 Chrysler or GM. Hmmm. Nah.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lichtronamo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-405222</link>
		<dc:creator>Lichtronamo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/#comment-405222</guid>
		<description>Does anyone else think Ford may have done their agreement with the CAW so early and with such favorable terms so as to push either GM or Chrysler into the abyss of C11?

Ford is the one company of the Big 3 that can&#039;t really go C11 because the Ford family&#039;s wealth and control of the company would be wiped out.  As such, with their renewal program taking hold and looking to pick up steam in 2009/2010 with new product, why not see if they can add the dead-cat bounce too?

Crazy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Does anyone else think Ford may have done their agreement with the CAW so early and with such favorable terms so as to push either GM or Chrysler into the abyss of C11?</p>
<p>Ford is the one company of the Big 3 that can&#8217;t really go C11 because the Ford family&#8217;s wealth and control of the company would be wiped out.  As such, with their renewal program taking hold and looking to pick up steam in 2009/2010 with new product, why not see if they can add the dead-cat bounce too?</p>
<p>Crazy?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-405221</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/#comment-405221</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;GM Canada wont be pulling out of Canada any time soon as they have too much invested here as well as they keep getting Gifts of Cash from the Ontario Government, besides they sell a lot of vehicles here as well as the ability to do so ie if you dont build them here, you cant sell them here!&lt;/em&gt;

In my state (Indiana), Honda is building a new plant to build not union made Civics to start with. Everyone is excited to have them here, plus for the economic spin-offs and opportunities. Who doesn&#039;t want a well made car manufacture? Kind of has that long term outlook!

Personally, I own two Jeeps after once owning two Hondas. I&#039;m wanting to add a third new car, and guess what it&#039;s going to be? If you guessed a Honda, you guessed right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>GM Canada wont be pulling out of Canada any time soon as they have too much invested here as well as they keep getting Gifts of Cash from the Ontario Government, besides they sell a lot of vehicles here as well as the ability to do so ie if you dont build them here, you cant sell them here!</em></p>
<p>In my state (Indiana), Honda is building a new plant to build not union made Civics to start with. Everyone is excited to have them here, plus for the economic spin-offs and opportunities. Who doesn&#8217;t want a well made car manufacture? Kind of has that long term outlook!</p>
<p>Personally, I own two Jeeps after once owning two Hondas. I&#8217;m wanting to add a third new car, and guess what it&#8217;s going to be? If you guessed a Honda, you guessed right.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jolo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-404761</link>
		<dc:creator>jolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/#comment-404761</guid>
		<description>The general concensus is that in order for them to sell in Canada, they need to build in Canada.  Makes sense.  Question - what is the number of sales that were in Canada for GM in 2005, 2006 and 2007?  Anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The general concensus is that in order for them to sell in Canada, they need to build in Canada.  Makes sense.  Question &#8211; what is the number of sales that were in Canada for GM in 2005, 2006 and 2007?  Anyone?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Potena</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-404641</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Potena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/#comment-404641</guid>
		<description>I have a modest proposal (pun intended). Tie the benefits packages, both hourly and management, to market share (exclusive of fleet sales). Build a popular product, get a bonus. Build a stinker (insert Big 2.8 car model here) then you get nothing! If the Big 2.8 are as good as they say they are, then they should have nothing to worry about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I have a modest proposal (pun intended). Tie the benefits packages, both hourly and management, to market share (exclusive of fleet sales). Build a popular product, get a bonus. Build a stinker (insert Big 2.8 car model here) then you get nothing! If the Big 2.8 are as good as they say they are, then they should have nothing to worry about.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jl1280</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-404572</link>
		<dc:creator>jl1280</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/#comment-404572</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that it takes two parties to come to an agreement. So the real question must be why does GM &quot;management&quot; imagine that it isn&#039;t a good contract. Do you really think that they sign a union contract just because it is in the best interest of the union, or have they decided that it&#039;s a good deal for the company and its sharecroppers.  Holding wages flat and giving up a weeks holidays isn&#039;t for everyone. Are you prepared to do it? Are the 10,000 GM execs prepared to do the same? I think we know the answer to both these questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Seems to me that it takes two parties to come to an agreement. So the real question must be why does GM &#8220;management&#8221; imagine that it isn&#8217;t a good contract. Do you really think that they sign a union contract just because it is in the best interest of the union, or have they decided that it&#8217;s a good deal for the company and its sharecroppers.  Holding wages flat and giving up a weeks holidays isn&#8217;t for everyone. Are you prepared to do it? Are the 10,000 GM execs prepared to do the same? I think we know the answer to both these questions.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike66Chryslers</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-404282</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike66Chryslers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 17:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/#comment-404282</guid>
		<description>This is slightly off-topic, but I&#039;m surprised that TTAC never picked-up on the recent announcement by Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty (shown at left in the pic for this article) that he is &quot;in talks&quot; with other auto manufacturers to build a new plant in Ontario.  Fiat and the Chinese were mentioned.  Good luck with that.

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpposted/archive/2008/04/29/ontario-premier-confident-province-will-get-new-auto-plant.aspx

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20080506.RFIAT06/TPStory/Business

PS: I&#039;d like to propose a caption for the picture.  &quot;...and then I told them I wasn&#039;t going to introduce any new taxes!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->This is slightly off-topic, but I&#8217;m surprised that TTAC never picked-up on the recent announcement by Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty (shown at left in the pic for this article) that he is &#8220;in talks&#8221; with other auto manufacturers to build a new plant in Ontario.  Fiat and the Chinese were mentioned.  Good luck with that.</p>
<p><a href="http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpposted/archive/2008/04/29/ontario-premier-confident-province-will-get-new-auto-plant.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpposted/archive/2008/04/29/ontario-premier-confident-province-will-get-new-auto-plant.aspx</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20080506.RFIAT06/TPStory/Business" rel="nofollow">http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20080506.RFIAT06/TPStory/Business</a></p>
<p>PS: I&#8217;d like to propose a caption for the picture.  &#8220;&#8230;and then I told them I wasn&#8217;t going to introduce any new taxes!&#8221;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-404192</link>
		<dc:creator>mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 16:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/#comment-404192</guid>
		<description>So if the General won&#039;t play ball Buzz goes to Chrysler?Works for me we got a COLA increase coming June 1st.
 Lets face we don&#039;t want eat concesions period thus the 67%{40% turn out eh}
 So union bashing aside,hows anybody figure your gonn&#039;a sell the GM people on less than Ford got?
  Is GM hurtin?I certainly don&#039;t see any sacrifice on managements part.JT HORNER has it right GM will cave.Anything different would require management skills,wich are in short supply here at GM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->So if the General won&#8217;t play ball Buzz goes to Chrysler?Works for me we got a COLA increase coming June 1st.<br />
 Lets face we don&#8217;t want eat concesions period thus the 67%{40% turn out eh}<br />
 So union bashing aside,hows anybody figure your gonn&#8217;a sell the GM people on less than Ford got?<br />
  Is GM hurtin?I certainly don&#8217;t see any sacrifice on managements part.JT HORNER has it right GM will cave.Anything different would require management skills,wich are in short supply here at GM.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Labrador</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-403941</link>
		<dc:creator>George Labrador</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/#comment-403941</guid>
		<description>GM Canada wont be pulling out of Canada any time soon as they have too much invested here as well as they keep getting Gifts of Cash from the Ontario Government, besides they sell a lot of vehicles here as well as the ability to do so ie if you dont build  them here, you cant sell them here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->GM Canada wont be pulling out of Canada any time soon as they have too much invested here as well as they keep getting Gifts of Cash from the Ontario Government, besides they sell a lot of vehicles here as well as the ability to do so ie if you dont build  them here, you cant sell them here!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kwanzaa</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-403921</link>
		<dc:creator>Kwanzaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/#comment-403921</guid>
		<description>Why, this is better than watching football!!

BTW, thanks jthorner for the nice write-up.  It&#039;s nice to see readers taking the spirit of journalism upon themselves...I think it&#039;s great.  

We don&#039;t need no de Lorenzo.  Those self-important types make me nauseous anyway.  I have to admit, I started off reading that yahoo on the web, but I cannot tolerate his GM apologist attitude.  It&#039;s sickening.

I&#039;ll take native grown talent any day :)  Keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Why, this is better than watching football!!</p>
<p>BTW, thanks jthorner for the nice write-up.  It&#8217;s nice to see readers taking the spirit of journalism upon themselves&#8230;I think it&#8217;s great.  </p>
<p>We don&#8217;t need no de Lorenzo.  Those self-important types make me nauseous anyway.  I have to admit, I started off reading that yahoo on the web, but I cannot tolerate his GM apologist attitude.  It&#8217;s sickening.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll take native grown talent any day :)  Keep it up.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaje</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-403851</link>
		<dc:creator>jaje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/#comment-403851</guid>
		<description>Ah - the CAW (Cancer-like Automotive Woes) just cannot see the future for the short term dollars.  Parasites need to learn that in order to survive longer they need to coexist with the host and not kill it.  It is a prisoner&#039;s dilemma they never seem to understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Ah &#8211; the CAW (Cancer-like Automotive Woes) just cannot see the future for the short term dollars.  Parasites need to learn that in order to survive longer they need to coexist with the host and not kill it.  It is a prisoner&#8217;s dilemma they never seem to understand.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orian</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-403821</link>
		<dc:creator>Orian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/#comment-403821</guid>
		<description>Yeah, let them turn their guns on Chrysler and GM...them promptly shoot themselves in the foot.

They do seem a bit oblivious to what is happening with both of those manufacturers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Yeah, let them turn their guns on Chrysler and GM&#8230;them promptly shoot themselves in the foot.</p>
<p>They do seem a bit oblivious to what is happening with both of those manufacturers.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BabyM</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-403792</link>
		<dc:creator>BabyM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/#comment-403792</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of the UAW&#039;s strike against Studebaker&#039;s South bend plant in 1962, just as the Avanti entered pre-production.  How&#039;d that one work out, guys?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Reminds me of the UAW&#8217;s strike against Studebaker&#8217;s South bend plant in 1962, just as the Avanti entered pre-production.  How&#8217;d that one work out, guys?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NeonCat93</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-403791</link>
		<dc:creator>NeonCat93</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/#comment-403791</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure this is a terribly, terribly naïve question, but given all the slack at other GM plants, why couldn&#039;t GM pull all their production out of Canada?  I am not asking to be mean or because I want any of our neighbors to the north to lose their jobs, but what exactly is keeping GM from taking their ball and going home?  Given the belligerence of CAW&#039;s leadership, why is it off the table?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;m sure this is a terribly, terribly naïve question, but given all the slack at other GM plants, why couldn&#8217;t GM pull all their production out of Canada?  I am not asking to be mean or because I want any of our neighbors to the north to lose their jobs, but what exactly is keeping GM from taking their ball and going home?  Given the belligerence of CAW&#8217;s leadership, why is it off the table?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Banned User</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-403781</link>
		<dc:creator>Banned User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/caw-turns-its-guns-on-struggling-gm-defenseless-chrysler/#comment-403781</guid>
		<description>Ford is launching the new Flex and also needs Essex Engine to supply V8 cranks for the Romeo Engine Plant launch of the new 6.2l V8.  If Buzz strikes Chrysler or GM they might not even notice.



E-mail from a CAW official
You ought to know better! You were a representative at Pillette Road where we had three different investment commitments and the plant ultimately closed because of market share losses. Chrysler as well as Ford and GM continue to shrink so there is no such thing as “protection” if your reference is to jobs. 

The recent economic agreement is a huge victory for Big Three workers because the changes we made were kept at a minimal. Why is that? Ford, Oakville is expected to launch their third shift – very important vehicle to their survival so it made sense to utilize that only pressure tactic we had and the timing is perfect. GM and Chrysler (as witnessed by the American Axle Strike) could go down and nobody would even care. We would have to call them to advise them we are on strike. Huge inventories, and slowing sales are getting worse by the minute. Buzz seized the moment – progressive thinking and took full advantage of the one card in the deck. I am involved in every strategic decision of the Union, so please feel comfortable in contacting me directly. The auto industry’s “historic domestic” is in serious, serious trouble and the market is huge reason for concern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Ford is launching the new Flex and also needs Essex Engine to supply V8 cranks for the Romeo Engine Plant launch of the new 6.2l V8.  If Buzz strikes Chrysler or GM they might not even notice.</p>
<p>E-mail from a CAW official<br />
You ought to know better! You were a representative at Pillette Road where we had three different investment commitments and the plant ultimately closed because of market share losses. Chrysler as well as Ford and GM continue to shrink so there is no such thing as “protection” if your reference is to jobs. </p>
<p>The recent economic agreement is a huge victory for Big Three workers because the changes we made were kept at a minimal. Why is that? Ford, Oakville is expected to launch their third shift – very important vehicle to their survival so it made sense to utilize that only pressure tactic we had and the timing is perfect. GM and Chrysler (as witnessed by the American Axle Strike) could go down and nobody would even care. We would have to call them to advise them we are on strike. Huge inventories, and slowing sales are getting worse by the minute. Buzz seized the moment – progressive thinking and took full advantage of the one card in the deck. I am involved in every strategic decision of the Union, so please feel comfortable in contacting me directly. The auto industry’s “historic domestic” is in serious, serious trouble and the market is huge reason for concern.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 41/117 queries in 0.087 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 06:44:17 -->