The Mazda3’s performance has always kept it a step ahead of the other economy cars on the market. However, as Mazda’s worked to differentiate their econobox from cookie-cutter Cobalts, Corollas and Civics visually, they’ve tweaked it from “different” to “borderline bizarre.” They say, “beauty is only skin deep, but ugly goes clean to the bones.” Has Mazda gone too far, or is the 2010 Mazda3s Sport still good enough underneath to make you overlook its sheet metal shortcomings?

One of the least publicized aspects of the “New” GM is how much of the old company remains on the books. More to the point, bad ideas with new window dressings still reign (Cutlass) supreme. But not the new 2006—sorry, 2010—Chevrolet Camaro: this idea had the right stuff. On paper. In the real world?

My first car was a 1970s–era Opel Rekord. It was one of the most beautiful cars GM ever made. It was also roomy, reliable, as well as cheap to own and service. Those typical brand values made Opel a star player in Europe, and demoted Ford and many others to the status of also-rans. Later, Opel lost the reliability and beauty part of the plot. Is today's Rekord – the Opel Insignia – good enough to lead an almost-dead company to the future?

TTAC writer Samir Syed was on the lamb last night, cooked by yours truly. To honor the dead sheep's spirit, Sam brought by a rented Ford Mustang GT. For some reason, I never got ’round to driving Ford's latest Pony Car, what with the world's largest bankruptcy looming on the editorial horizon and my step-daughter's after-school activities ending for the term. Anyway, the car in which I was about to go roaming in the gloaming embodied its designers' desire to re-infuse the ’Stang with some understated classicism---while attempting to add a bit of visual drama (swage much?). Other than a hideously overwrought rear, there's nothing particularly wrong with the result. Not to put fine a point on it (so to speak), the new Mustang doesn't give me wood. Still, personal fertility and automotive blue pill issues aside, there are plenty of reasons to be cheerful.

Let me take you down, cause I’m going to. . . GT-R Fields. Almost nothing is real, whether you’re talking about the ridiculous Nurburgring-centric engi-marketing, the programmed-to-self-destruct transmissions, or the amazing shrinking customer warranties. Still, there’s nothing to get hung about (so to speak). The entire concept behind the GT-R---building a car that more or less steers itself to people who can’t drive for shit, live in downtown Tokyo, or both-- is stranger than any LSD trip John Lennon could have possibly imagined.

Marketing to a particular demographic is a tricky business--just ask Honda or Toyota. Honda introduced the Element in 2003. Toyota brought us the Scion xB in 2004. Both machines were designed as funky vehicles to fit the twenty-something lifestyle. Needless to say, their room and versatility immediately found favor with the quintagenarian crowd. Now Kia's taking a shot with the Soul. Our own Eddie Niedermeyer, squarely in the demographic Kia's aiming for, liked it. But then there are us pesky demographic-bustin' Boomers. Will we see more Souls parked at the old farts' home than on college campuses?

I'll come right out and say it: It's my parents' fault. You see, my mom's just a couple of inches over five feet tall and my dad's only a bit taller than she is. But for some reason they passed genes to me resulting in me growing to 6'3". It makes for interesting family portraits but when it comes to cars, it sucks. I grew up riding with my knees shoved in the dashboard of whatever bench-seat-equipped sedan they happened to own at the time. And now I'm given a Mazda MX-5 Miata Grand Touring to review. Genetics is a bitch.