<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carbon Fiber: So Good It Hurts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/carbon-fiber-so-good-it-hurts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/carbon-fiber-so-good-it-hurts/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:31:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: make_or_break</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/carbon-fiber-so-good-it-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-1511420</link>
		<dc:creator>make_or_break</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=1568#comment-1511420</guid>
		<description>Only months late to the game...well, whaddaya expect from a newbie?

In terms of problems: there&#039;s also some concerns about the toxicity of CRP as well, something not discussed by the original article or by the comments. As the author pointed out; CRP when it does fail goes out in a big way. How &lt;em&gt;small&lt;/em&gt; this big way is unclear, but looking at crash footage of notable accidents where CRP was present (as with the big crash Robert Kubica had at the Canadian GP in 2007), I have to wonder what sort of CF particulates were tossed into the environment in the resultant dust cloud that followed the initial impact. 

There have been reports that under a microscope, a number of carbon nanotubes look a lot like asbestos fibers. But how dangerous this actually is is still unclear, because not enough research has been done as to how long these carbon fibers actually will exist in an environment like a human body. But considering how CF advocates proclaim the benefits of CRP longevity elsewhere, is it really too much to assume that such inhaled dust cloud fibers will stay in the body for a long, LONG time...just like asbestos?

Maybe I&#039;m just paranoid, but I think I&#039;d rather stay upwind of said dust cloud if I had the choice. Problem is, in an accident there isn&#039;t such a choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Only months late to the game&#8230;well, whaddaya expect from a newbie?</p>
<p>In terms of problems: there&#8217;s also some concerns about the toxicity of CRP as well, something not discussed by the original article or by the comments. As the author pointed out; CRP when it does fail goes out in a big way. How <em>small</em> this big way is unclear, but looking at crash footage of notable accidents where CRP was present (as with the big crash Robert Kubica had at the Canadian GP in 2007), I have to wonder what sort of CF particulates were tossed into the environment in the resultant dust cloud that followed the initial impact. </p>
<p>There have been reports that under a microscope, a number of carbon nanotubes look a lot like asbestos fibers. But how dangerous this actually is is still unclear, because not enough research has been done as to how long these carbon fibers actually will exist in an environment like a human body. But considering how CF advocates proclaim the benefits of CRP longevity elsewhere, is it really too much to assume that such inhaled dust cloud fibers will stay in the body for a long, LONG time&#8230;just like asbestos?</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m just paranoid, but I think I&#8217;d rather stay upwind of said dust cloud if I had the choice. Problem is, in an accident there isn&#8217;t such a choice.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbossa</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/carbon-fiber-so-good-it-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-1370362</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbossa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=1568#comment-1370362</guid>
		<description>@Serious and KnightRT,

Absolutely correct.  And yes, KnightRT, the chassis must be autoclaved in order to cure the resin. For some information on the subject look at the ATR group in Italy who makes most of the F1 chassis tubs, as well as the Veyron&#039;s, Ferrari Enzo and the aforementioned Carrera GT.

CRP (Carbon Reinforced Plastic) is by far the optimal material currently for the &lt;b&gt;structural&lt;/b&gt; elements of a vehicle&#039;s chassis. It&#039;s only real problem is expense and not necessarily from a materials standpoint but mass production.

It comes down to &quot;what&#039;s your life worth?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@Serious and KnightRT,</p>
<p>Absolutely correct.  And yes, KnightRT, the chassis must be autoclaved in order to cure the resin. For some information on the subject look at the ATR group in Italy who makes most of the F1 chassis tubs, as well as the Veyron&#8217;s, Ferrari Enzo and the aforementioned Carrera GT.</p>
<p>CRP (Carbon Reinforced Plastic) is by far the optimal material currently for the <b>structural</b> elements of a vehicle&#8217;s chassis. It&#8217;s only real problem is expense and not necessarily from a materials standpoint but mass production.</p>
<p>It comes down to &#8220;what&#8217;s your life worth?&#8221;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rpn453</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/carbon-fiber-so-good-it-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-1365432</link>
		<dc:creator>rpn453</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=1568#comment-1365432</guid>
		<description>Carbon fiber reinforced plastic is not harder than steel.  You can easily scratch it up with any steel knife.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Carbon fiber reinforced plastic is not harder than steel.  You can easily scratch it up with any steel knife.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexdi</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/carbon-fiber-so-good-it-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-1364382</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexdi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=1568#comment-1364382</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Translation: carbon fiber withstands one [massive] impact and… that’s it.&lt;/i&gt;

This conclusion does not follow from the previous sentence and is not based on any scientific or engineering knowledge. 

&lt;i&gt;but it also is staggeringly expensive&lt;/i&gt;

Carbon fiber is just graphite and resin. The raw material cost is less than $8 a pound, which, while a single-digit multiple of the cost of steel, is hardly staggering. Much of the expense is in crafting the fiber sheets into the shape of a vehicle chassis, because they&#039;re only strong on two axes (and depending on the particular fiber, only in tension) and therefore don&#039;t lend themselves to mass production metalworking techniques. The McLaren F1&#039;s chassis actually required baking in a massive kiln, though I&#039;m unaware if this is still the norm. 

Insofar as you suggest that the main point of the article is that carbon fiber &quot;sucks,&quot; the article is wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><i>Translation: carbon fiber withstands one [massive] impact and… that’s it.</i></p>
<p>This conclusion does not follow from the previous sentence and is not based on any scientific or engineering knowledge. </p>
<p><i>but it also is staggeringly expensive</i></p>
<p>Carbon fiber is just graphite and resin. The raw material cost is less than $8 a pound, which, while a single-digit multiple of the cost of steel, is hardly staggering. Much of the expense is in crafting the fiber sheets into the shape of a vehicle chassis, because they&#8217;re only strong on two axes (and depending on the particular fiber, only in tension) and therefore don&#8217;t lend themselves to mass production metalworking techniques. The McLaren F1&#8217;s chassis actually required baking in a massive kiln, though I&#8217;m unaware if this is still the norm. </p>
<p>Insofar as you suggest that the main point of the article is that carbon fiber &#8220;sucks,&#8221; the article is wrong.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertplattbell</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/carbon-fiber-so-good-it-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-1138902</link>
		<dc:creator>robertplattbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=1568#comment-1138902</guid>
		<description>I think the point he is trying to make, and it is a good one, that carbon fiber, for general transportation automobiles (the kind most of us drive) is a joke.

Leaving aside the carbon fiber trim pieces (and the fake carbon fiber trim pieces, which are just as function, albeit less expensive), in terms of daily drivability, carbon fiber offers little advantages to the street car owner.

Steel has toughness that can withstand impacts and bounce back.  Minor dents can be pounded out (sometimes without repainting, those dent doctor places actually work).

Granted, carbon fiber is stronger and lighter weight, but it also is staggeringly expensive.  As a practical material for an affordable mass-production street car, it leaves a lot to be desired.

Just because something works well in a race car does not make it suitable for a street car.  In fact, most racing gear is best left on race cars. The idea that racing technology trickles down to street cars is largely a marketing gimmick.  What works on the track is often disasterous on the street.

(Perhaps if race cars had to go 150,000 miles between teardowns, some of the technology might be applicable to a street car).

The main point of the article was not that carbon fiber sucks, only that as TRIM material for the interior of a car, it is ludicrous.  But the same could be said of &quot;brushed aluminum&quot; trim, which is often, in reality, plastic.

I ran into one doofus who was trying to remove all the &quot;fake wood&quot; trim from his BMW X5 to replace it with aftermarket plastic fake brushed aluminum trim (they also make a fake carbon fiber kit as well).

Of course, the joke is on him.  The &quot;fake wood&quot; in the BMW is, of course, the real deal, not some plastic laminate.  But yet he dropped over a grand taking it out and replacing it with...plastic faked up to look like aluminum.

Go Figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I think the point he is trying to make, and it is a good one, that carbon fiber, for general transportation automobiles (the kind most of us drive) is a joke.</p>
<p>Leaving aside the carbon fiber trim pieces (and the fake carbon fiber trim pieces, which are just as function, albeit less expensive), in terms of daily drivability, carbon fiber offers little advantages to the street car owner.</p>
<p>Steel has toughness that can withstand impacts and bounce back.  Minor dents can be pounded out (sometimes without repainting, those dent doctor places actually work).</p>
<p>Granted, carbon fiber is stronger and lighter weight, but it also is staggeringly expensive.  As a practical material for an affordable mass-production street car, it leaves a lot to be desired.</p>
<p>Just because something works well in a race car does not make it suitable for a street car.  In fact, most racing gear is best left on race cars. The idea that racing technology trickles down to street cars is largely a marketing gimmick.  What works on the track is often disasterous on the street.</p>
<p>(Perhaps if race cars had to go 150,000 miles between teardowns, some of the technology might be applicable to a street car).</p>
<p>The main point of the article was not that carbon fiber sucks, only that as TRIM material for the interior of a car, it is ludicrous.  But the same could be said of &#8220;brushed aluminum&#8221; trim, which is often, in reality, plastic.</p>
<p>I ran into one doofus who was trying to remove all the &#8220;fake wood&#8221; trim from his BMW X5 to replace it with aftermarket plastic fake brushed aluminum trim (they also make a fake carbon fiber kit as well).</p>
<p>Of course, the joke is on him.  The &#8220;fake wood&#8221; in the BMW is, of course, the real deal, not some plastic laminate.  But yet he dropped over a grand taking it out and replacing it with&#8230;plastic faked up to look like aluminum.</p>
<p>Go Figure.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serious</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/carbon-fiber-so-good-it-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-55883</link>
		<dc:creator>Serious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=1568#comment-55883</guid>
		<description>The author hasn&#039;t done any research. Carbon fiber is much much much stiffer than steel, and not just per weight. A mclaren F1&#039;s chassis is a monocoque, and is the stiffest chassis on any road car. Have you ever seen an F1 crash? The survival cell isn&#039;t even bent, and they crash at very high speeds. It looks silly, I agree, but it is the best matierial to make a car out of, bar the cost and production time. Ask any automotive engineer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The author hasn&#8217;t done any research. Carbon fiber is much much much stiffer than steel, and not just per weight. A mclaren F1&#8217;s chassis is a monocoque, and is the stiffest chassis on any road car. Have you ever seen an F1 crash? The survival cell isn&#8217;t even bent, and they crash at very high speeds. It looks silly, I agree, but it is the best matierial to make a car out of, bar the cost and production time. Ask any automotive engineer.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: camp6ell</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/carbon-fiber-so-good-it-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>camp6ell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 01:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=1568#comment-28</guid>
		<description>but it&#039;s very shiny, jonny! d&#039;oh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->but it&#8217;s very shiny, jonny! d&#8217;oh!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 19/60 queries in 0.136 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 12:46:17 -->