<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breaking: GM Does a 180; Decides to Keep Opel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:07:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven02</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559440</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559440</guid>
		<description>@ dougjp
Magna was going to do the same thing.  Close plants and let workers go.  This was going to cause strikes anyway.  

People in the US are still buying GM.  My guess is that the same thing will happen in Europe and Russia.  

Chapter 7 may very will be in their future, but their pensions are safe.  Gotta love our gov&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@ dougjp<br />
Magna was going to do the same thing.  Close plants and let workers go.  This was going to cause strikes anyway.  </p>
<p>People in the US are still buying GM.  My guess is that the same thing will happen in Europe and Russia.  </p>
<p>Chapter 7 may very will be in their future, but their pensions are safe.  Gotta love our gov&#8217;t.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Autobraz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559350</link>
		<dc:creator>Autobraz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559350</guid>
		<description>I fully agree with FromBrazil. GM here is going down...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I fully agree with FromBrazil. GM here is going down&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redwood</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559334</link>
		<dc:creator>Redwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559334</guid>
		<description>I knew GM didn&#039;t really want to give up Opel. That was a dumb move in the first place, but one made in desperation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I knew GM didn&#8217;t really want to give up Opel. That was a dumb move in the first place, but one made in desperation.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Carpenter</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559306</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Carpenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559306</guid>
		<description>Dear Pch101, please don&#039;t blame free enterprise for GM&#039;s debacle.  

The United States has not had free enterprise since early last century.

A oligopoly such as GM and Ford with a few other players &quot;allowed&quot; to stay in the game (to avoid having GM dismantled, mostly) also doesn&#039;t qualify as free enterprise.  

Neither does having one union representing all the workforce in the companies, by fiat (i.e. government decree - which is essentially what happened).  That&#039;s a monopoly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Dear Pch101, please don&#8217;t blame free enterprise for GM&#8217;s debacle.  </p>
<p>The United States has not had free enterprise since early last century.</p>
<p>A oligopoly such as GM and Ford with a few other players &#8220;allowed&#8221; to stay in the game (to avoid having GM dismantled, mostly) also doesn&#8217;t qualify as free enterprise.  </p>
<p>Neither does having one union representing all the workforce in the companies, by fiat (i.e. government decree &#8211; which is essentially what happened).  That&#8217;s a monopoly.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pch101</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559275</link>
		<dc:creator>Pch101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559275</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;GM was desperate trying to off Opel to the Russians/Magna.&lt;/em&gt;

It appears to me that GM never wanted to do the deal in the first place.  It was driven by a lack of cash and its lack of options during the economic crisis, not by desire.

The problem here is that the presidential auto task force has been disbanded.  Now that GM has been left to make many of its own decisions again, it&#039;s going back to being the old GM.  That includes the mentality of being a large, sprawling company for the sake of it, even if that is unprofitable.

We didn&#039;t less government involvement, but more of it.   The task force did a better job in a few months than GM management did over a few decades.  The top of the company should have been turned over, but it wasn&#039;t.  So much for the wonders of free enterprise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>GM was desperate trying to off Opel to the Russians/Magna.</em></p>
<p>It appears to me that GM never wanted to do the deal in the first place.  It was driven by a lack of cash and its lack of options during the economic crisis, not by desire.</p>
<p>The problem here is that the presidential auto task force has been disbanded.  Now that GM has been left to make many of its own decisions again, it&#8217;s going back to being the old GM.  That includes the mentality of being a large, sprawling company for the sake of it, even if that is unprofitable.</p>
<p>We didn&#8217;t less government involvement, but more of it.   The task force did a better job in a few months than GM management did over a few decades.  The top of the company should have been turned over, but it wasn&#8217;t.  So much for the wonders of free enterprise.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NN</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559257</link>
		<dc:creator>NN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559257</guid>
		<description>The taxpayer money going to GM is not supposed to go to support foreign portions of the business.  Is there any way it can be researched whether they are breaking this rule or not?

GM was desperate trying to off Opel to the Russians/Magna.  That was a suicidal idea.  It&#039;s good for GM that they got out of that and are keeping Opel.  The German government was breaking EU laws anyways by funding Opel for German jobs with taxpayer money at the expense of Opel&#039;s other European plants in Spain and the UK.  

Interesting saga.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The taxpayer money going to GM is not supposed to go to support foreign portions of the business.  Is there any way it can be researched whether they are breaking this rule or not?</p>
<p>GM was desperate trying to off Opel to the Russians/Magna.  That was a suicidal idea.  It&#8217;s good for GM that they got out of that and are keeping Opel.  The German government was breaking EU laws anyways by funding Opel for German jobs with taxpayer money at the expense of Opel&#8217;s other European plants in Spain and the UK.  </p>
<p>Interesting saga.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pch101</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559256</link>
		<dc:creator>Pch101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559256</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s understandable that GM would want to keep Opel.  Europe provides a stable market for smaller cars, and playing there allows for GM to amortize its small car development costs across a larger, more consistent market for smaller vehicles than the US has.

What isn&#039;t understandable is how this can be supported financially.  I suppose that the US taxpayer will end up having to pay for it, because GM surely isn&#039;t producing enough revenue or profit to support this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->It&#8217;s understandable that GM would want to keep Opel.  Europe provides a stable market for smaller cars, and playing there allows for GM to amortize its small car development costs across a larger, more consistent market for smaller vehicles than the US has.</p>
<p>What isn&#8217;t understandable is how this can be supported financially.  I suppose that the US taxpayer will end up having to pay for it, because GM surely isn&#8217;t producing enough revenue or profit to support this.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FromBrazil</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559251</link>
		<dc:creator>FromBrazil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559251</guid>
		<description>As to GM&#039;s situation in Latin America, I don&#039;t know, but in Brazil I think they&#039;re tanking. You see, they just launched the Daewoo designed and engineered Agile. And the market&#039;s reaction? Everybody has been pretty much underwhelmed. I mean, when they launched the car and stated its starting price, the boos could be heard all the way in Detroit. So they decided to keep the price, but offer more content, allenging that what they&#039;d said before had been a mistake. Talk of a botched launch.

So this new sub-par car is supposed to spawn a whole family (sedan, station wagon, jeep, pick-up). In the mission critical low price car market. That why I predict they&#039;ll be losing more and more ground. I mean, when they launched Opel&#039;s Corsa here, at the same time they did in Europe, it was a big hit. But that car impressed everyone and was pretty much state of the art back then. This new Agile is a throwback and so, despite the best efforts of GM&#039;s hard-working people down here, I&#039;ll bet the results will leave the big dogs in Detroit scratching their heads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->As to GM&#8217;s situation in Latin America, I don&#8217;t know, but in Brazil I think they&#8217;re tanking. You see, they just launched the Daewoo designed and engineered Agile. And the market&#8217;s reaction? Everybody has been pretty much underwhelmed. I mean, when they launched the car and stated its starting price, the boos could be heard all the way in Detroit. So they decided to keep the price, but offer more content, allenging that what they&#8217;d said before had been a mistake. Talk of a botched launch.</p>
<p>So this new sub-par car is supposed to spawn a whole family (sedan, station wagon, jeep, pick-up). In the mission critical low price car market. That why I predict they&#8217;ll be losing more and more ground. I mean, when they launched Opel&#8217;s Corsa here, at the same time they did in Europe, it was a big hit. But that car impressed everyone and was pretty much state of the art back then. This new Agile is a throwback and so, despite the best efforts of GM&#8217;s hard-working people down here, I&#8217;ll bet the results will leave the big dogs in Detroit scratching their heads.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wmba</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559250</link>
		<dc:creator>wmba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559250</guid>
		<description>Where&#039;s the money coming from to:

1)Pay back the German government&#039;s bridge loan that kept this Opel &quot;enterprise&quot; afloat since GM folded into abject bankruptcy? That&#039;s due RIGHT NOW.

2)Refinancing funds to replace what the German government and Magna were going to inject into the sale? GM says governments and others across Europe. Utter BS.

The money is coming out of Canadian and US taxpayers pockets. Nobody else is going to be stupid enough to lend money to this entity.

The new GM board appears to be as awake as the old one. The way I see it Stronach is lucky to get out of this porcine affair with his money intact.

Nothing GM says or does makes sense. Opel is screwed in Europe -- no wonder that the workers are going on strike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Where&#8217;s the money coming from to:</p>
<p>1)Pay back the German government&#8217;s bridge loan that kept this Opel &#8220;enterprise&#8221; afloat since GM folded into abject bankruptcy? That&#8217;s due RIGHT NOW.</p>
<p>2)Refinancing funds to replace what the German government and Magna were going to inject into the sale? GM says governments and others across Europe. Utter BS.</p>
<p>The money is coming out of Canadian and US taxpayers pockets. Nobody else is going to be stupid enough to lend money to this entity.</p>
<p>The new GM board appears to be as awake as the old one. The way I see it Stronach is lucky to get out of this porcine affair with his money intact.</p>
<p>Nothing GM says or does makes sense. Opel is screwed in Europe &#8212; no wonder that the workers are going on strike.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Carpenter</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559240</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Carpenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559240</guid>
		<description>I have a sneaking suspicion that we have not yet heard the last of Magna and auto production.

China is starting to sort out its many car manufacturing enterprises quietly.  

Chinese automakers are starting to push their own &quot;brands&quot; (some cars of which aren&#039;t even rip-offs of other manufacturer&#039;s designs).  

I suspect that paybacks are going to be a bitch with Magna, and that Magna will simply look to a deal with a Chinese company to actually manufacture and distribute co-developed cars.

My guess would be Guangzhou-Changfeng as a good candidate.  Their self-branded Acumen car brand might just be viable in other countries.  (Guangzhou works with both Honda and Toyota in China, and has learned very fast; Changfeng has worked with Mitsubishi and also has learned quickly).  Gonow also has a JV with Guangzhou.  

Brilliance, on the other hand, just hived off its loss making Brilliance/Zhongua self-developed car brand, which would be a great fit for Magna.  

Instead of Chinese companies buying distressed European or US automotive properties, it would be a Canadian company buying into a distressed Chinese property.  

Yeah, I know the Brilliance spectacularly, epically collapsed in a crash test in Europe awhile back; a mere few months later, Brilliance put an improved car to the test and it passed with 3 or 4 stars.  

Perhaps recasting the cars as the Magna and building them in North America and Europe would give Magna a shot at an automotive empire.  

There are plenty of p*ssed off dealers in North America ready to take on the big 3 after being rejected and left to die...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I have a sneaking suspicion that we have not yet heard the last of Magna and auto production.</p>
<p>China is starting to sort out its many car manufacturing enterprises quietly.  </p>
<p>Chinese automakers are starting to push their own &#8220;brands&#8221; (some cars of which aren&#8217;t even rip-offs of other manufacturer&#8217;s designs).  </p>
<p>I suspect that paybacks are going to be a bitch with Magna, and that Magna will simply look to a deal with a Chinese company to actually manufacture and distribute co-developed cars.</p>
<p>My guess would be Guangzhou-Changfeng as a good candidate.  Their self-branded Acumen car brand might just be viable in other countries.  (Guangzhou works with both Honda and Toyota in China, and has learned very fast; Changfeng has worked with Mitsubishi and also has learned quickly).  Gonow also has a JV with Guangzhou.  </p>
<p>Brilliance, on the other hand, just hived off its loss making Brilliance/Zhongua self-developed car brand, which would be a great fit for Magna.  </p>
<p>Instead of Chinese companies buying distressed European or US automotive properties, it would be a Canadian company buying into a distressed Chinese property.  </p>
<p>Yeah, I know the Brilliance spectacularly, epically collapsed in a crash test in Europe awhile back; a mere few months later, Brilliance put an improved car to the test and it passed with 3 or 4 stars.  </p>
<p>Perhaps recasting the cars as the Magna and building them in North America and Europe would give Magna a shot at an automotive empire.  </p>
<p>There are plenty of p*ssed off dealers in North America ready to take on the big 3 after being rejected and left to die&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Holliday</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559239</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Holliday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559239</guid>
		<description>This feels like that Simpsons episode - where Mr Burns sells the plant to some Germans. At the end he stiffs them, much to their dismay.

&quot;Oh no! The Germans are mad at me. Ooh the Germans! ooh they&#039;re so big and strong!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->This feels like that Simpsons episode &#8211; where Mr Burns sells the plant to some Germans. At the end he stiffs them, much to their dismay.</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh no! The Germans are mad at me. Ooh the Germans! ooh they&#8217;re so big and strong!&#8221;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dougjp</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559238</link>
		<dc:creator>dougjp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559238</guid>
		<description>The last straw, as if another of those was needed. How can anyone be positive about this? Look at the highly likely spin offs that the Board of Bystanders are too blind to see:

- Workers to Strike, German Gov&#039;t demands repayment. No further explanation required, its more than highly likely.
http://ca.news.finance.yahoo.com/s/04112009/2/biz-finance-workers-strike-german-government-wants-bridge-loan-gm.html

- What happens to Opel sales? Are any Europeans going to buy an Opel, meaning, willing to do business with GM? Would you? Maybe if you were a close relative depending on an Opel employee&#039;s salary, or other wise memory challenged. Otherwise, NO. Oh, and are any Russians going to buy from GM in future?

- After seeing once again (and another final straw) how GM &quot;does business&quot;, will anyone in North America agree to buy anything from them? Why? Other than the &quot;Wavey da flag&quot; types? Uh, looks good on ya, you are next to get screwed!

Chapter 7 can&#039;t come soon enough, and I hope these bozos lose their pension along with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The last straw, as if another of those was needed. How can anyone be positive about this? Look at the highly likely spin offs that the Board of Bystanders are too blind to see:</p>
<p>- Workers to Strike, German Gov&#8217;t demands repayment. No further explanation required, its more than highly likely.<br />
<a href="http://ca.news.finance.yahoo.com/s/04112009/2/biz-finance-workers-strike-german-government-wants-bridge-loan-gm.html" rel="nofollow">http://ca.news.finance.yahoo.com/s/04112009/2/biz-finance-workers-strike-german-government-wants-bridge-loan-gm.html</a></p>
<p>- What happens to Opel sales? Are any Europeans going to buy an Opel, meaning, willing to do business with GM? Would you? Maybe if you were a close relative depending on an Opel employee&#8217;s salary, or other wise memory challenged. Otherwise, NO. Oh, and are any Russians going to buy from GM in future?</p>
<p>- After seeing once again (and another final straw) how GM &#8220;does business&#8221;, will anyone in North America agree to buy anything from them? Why? Other than the &#8220;Wavey da flag&#8221; types? Uh, looks good on ya, you are next to get screwed!</p>
<p>Chapter 7 can&#8217;t come soon enough, and I hope these bozos lose their pension along with it.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Holliday</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559226</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Holliday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559226</guid>
		<description>Everyone&#039;s saying what a great day this is for GM, how well they&#039;ve played this one, etc etc. Can someone please explain to me how cancelling a sale fixes things?

So there won&#039;t be any cash coming. Legacy costs and the thousand and one other problems affecting GM that this site has been documenting over the years still exist, so now what..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Everyone&#8217;s saying what a great day this is for GM, how well they&#8217;ve played this one, etc etc. Can someone please explain to me how cancelling a sale fixes things?</p>
<p>So there won&#8217;t be any cash coming. Legacy costs and the thousand and one other problems affecting GM that this site has been documenting over the years still exist, so now what..<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tricky Dicky</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559213</link>
		<dc:creator>Tricky Dicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559213</guid>
		<description>Toyota also has a plant in Turkey which is part of their European operations and also a factory which employs over 600 people for the Formula 1 team in Germany. What was that? Oh, Toyota are quitting Formula 1?!  OK, maybe they will hand it over to full scale production of the LF-A, so they can sell it at a price us mere mortals can afford :-)

Well, congratulations Opel. You have not been set free. But you are part of a global company with a long-standing history. Good times are a coming... or probably not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Toyota also has a plant in Turkey which is part of their European operations and also a factory which employs over 600 people for the Formula 1 team in Germany. What was that? Oh, Toyota are quitting Formula 1?!  OK, maybe they will hand it over to full scale production of the LF-A, so they can sell it at a price us mere mortals can afford :-)</p>
<p>Well, congratulations Opel. You have not been set free. But you are part of a global company with a long-standing history. Good times are a coming&#8230; or probably not.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tosh</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559207</link>
		<dc:creator>Tosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559207</guid>
		<description>Next thing they&#039;ll be canceling Saturn&#039;s cancellation...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Next thing they&#8217;ll be canceling Saturn&#8217;s cancellation&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicodemus</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559206</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicodemus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559206</guid>
		<description>Technically you&#039;ve illustrated a split-s which like an immellman has a different purpose than just a 180 change in direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Technically you&#8217;ve illustrated a split-s which like an immellman has a different purpose than just a 180 change in direction.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Detroit Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559190</link>
		<dc:creator>Detroit Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559190</guid>
		<description>Enjoy your re-election, Ms. Merkel.  Now busy yourself with something else. Quickly.

Frank Stronach?  Vladimir Putin?  Barack Obama?  You guys can suck it, too. 

Now, on the whole, GM maybe be stupid, about many things.  I&#039;ll grant that.  But in this particular situation, they played it absolutely pitch perfect.  Couldn&#039;t have been better, really. 

Bravo, GM! Well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Enjoy your re-election, Ms. Merkel.  Now busy yourself with something else. Quickly.</p>
<p>Frank Stronach?  Vladimir Putin?  Barack Obama?  You guys can suck it, too. </p>
<p>Now, on the whole, GM maybe be stupid, about many things.  I&#8217;ll grant that.  But in this particular situation, they played it absolutely pitch perfect.  Couldn&#8217;t have been better, really. </p>
<p>Bravo, GM! Well done!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: car_czar</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559171</link>
		<dc:creator>car_czar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559171</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;John Horner : 

&quot;No automotive company can be a global powerhouse without a strong presence in Europe.&quot;

&quot;Toyota certainly has a presence in Europe including factories in France, UK, Poland, the Czech Republic, Portugal and Russia.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;



Well, Toyota had a 5.3% market share in Europe in 2008.  So, is your point that 5.3% is a strong presence, or that Toyota&#039;s not a global powerhouse?  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>John Horner : </p>
<p>&#8220;No automotive company can be a global powerhouse without a strong presence in Europe.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Toyota certainly has a presence in Europe including factories in France, UK, Poland, the Czech Republic, Portugal and Russia.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Well, Toyota had a 5.3% market share in Europe in 2008.  So, is your point that 5.3% is a strong presence, or that Toyota&#8217;s not a global powerhouse?  ;-)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ion</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559169</link>
		<dc:creator>Ion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559169</guid>
		<description>Duh, If their going to be using Opal to supply Buick with it&#039;s own G8(and inevitable failure) the Regal, they&#039;re not going to want to share the (minimal, if any) profits with Magna.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Duh, If their going to be using Opal to supply Buick with it&#8217;s own G8(and inevitable failure) the Regal, they&#8217;re not going to want to share the (minimal, if any) profits with Magna.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt B</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559162</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559162</guid>
		<description>I thought we all knew this would happen...
Poor F Stronach..Always the bridesmaid...at least he can cry into his golden pillow at night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I thought we all knew this would happen&#8230;<br />
Poor F Stronach..Always the bridesmaid&#8230;at least he can cry into his golden pillow at night.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertel Schmitt</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559154</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertel Schmitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559154</guid>
		<description>Sorry I missed the story. Was in the air from Beijing to San Diego. Here on station (once I found a Fry&#039;s that has the powersupply for my laptop. Left mine in China ....)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Sorry I missed the story. Was in the air from Beijing to San Diego. Here on station (once I found a Fry&#8217;s that has the powersupply for my laptop. Left mine in China &#8230;.)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ferrarimanf355</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559137</link>
		<dc:creator>ferrarimanf355</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559137</guid>
		<description>They should dump Daewoo and give small car development to Opel. I have little faith that the next Aveo refresh will stay competitive with the Fiesta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->They should dump Daewoo and give small car development to Opel. I have little faith that the next Aveo refresh will stay competitive with the Fiesta.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu Sidoti</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559135</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu Sidoti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559135</guid>
		<description>Gee, what a surprise.

There was never a plan to sell Opel, only a plan to make the PTFOA think that they were trying to sell Opel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Gee, what a surprise.</p>
<p>There was never a plan to sell Opel, only a plan to make the PTFOA think that they were trying to sell Opel.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tparkit</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559122</link>
		<dc:creator>tparkit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559122</guid>
		<description>That GM &quot;decided&quot; to keep Opel is one way to spin this outcome. I&#039;d prefer to say GM was unable -- so far -- to get rid of the subsidiary. There could only be a deal to transfer this turkey to Magna if the German government et al would subsidize it. With everybody playing hardball, there wasn&#039;t enough cash on the table to induce Magna to solve what is at bottom a political problem.

We haven&#039;t heard the last of this; a Delphi-style transfer of US taxpayer cash can still make this deal work, helping create the illusion that Washington is executing a free-market exit strategy from the car business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->That GM &#8220;decided&#8221; to keep Opel is one way to spin this outcome. I&#8217;d prefer to say GM was unable &#8212; so far &#8212; to get rid of the subsidiary. There could only be a deal to transfer this turkey to Magna if the German government et al would subsidize it. With everybody playing hardball, there wasn&#8217;t enough cash on the table to induce Magna to solve what is at bottom a political problem.</p>
<p>We haven&#8217;t heard the last of this; a Delphi-style transfer of US taxpayer cash can still make this deal work, helping create the illusion that Washington is executing a free-market exit strategy from the car business.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Porsche986</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-gm-does-a-180-decides-to-keep-opel/comment-page-1/#comment-1559118</link>
		<dc:creator>Porsche986</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=333970#comment-1559118</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Does Opel have the resources to provide the next Malibu and Impala? They used to make respected mid-size (for Europe) cars — how about now?&lt;/em&gt;

The current Malibu is based on the Epsilon chassis, which was designed and engineered at Opel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Does Opel have the resources to provide the next Malibu and Impala? They used to make respected mid-size (for Europe) cars — how about now?</em></p>
<p>The current Malibu is based on the Epsilon chassis, which was designed and engineered at Opel.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 57/159 queries in 0.166 seconds using apc

Served from: autoforums.com @ 2010-03-19 20:07:54 -->