By Edward Niedermeyer on July 8, 2008

$15 is less than $50...London's new Mayor Boris Johnson has scrapped his predecessors plans to hike congestion charges to nearly $50 per day, reports the Times. Not only has BoJo repealed Ken Livingstone's proposed fee bump, but he's even paid Porsche's six-figure legal bill after the German automaker lead the charge against the increase. "I am delighted that we have been able to scrap the £25 charge, which would have hit families and small businesses hardest," said Johnson. "I believe the proposal would actually have made congestion worse by allowing thousands of small cars in for free." And what makes "Red" Ken Livingstone most angry about the reversal of his controversial legacy? Environmental damage? Long commute times? No, it's the lost revenue for the city government. "The claim that £10m has been 'saved' by scrapping the CO2 charge is entirely false – in reality London will lose £30 million – £60million expected annual revenue from the scheme," said Livingstone. With that admission, any pretext that the beefed-up congestion charge is actually an environmental or traffic-calming measure is well and truly put to bed. Along with Mr Livingstone's political career. And good riddance too.

9 Comments on “Bojo Kills C-Charge Hike, Pays Porsche Lawyer Bill...”


  • psarhjinian

    Wait, wait, this would have hurt small businesses and families? What families, those two own cars and can afford to live in London’s core? Or those that own Cayennes and 911s?

    Look, even though I’m an avowed lefty, I don’t like revenue-generation masquerading as law and order. But let’s be serious, a congestion charge is a good way to keep traffic out of a major urban centre (which is a good thing) and fund public transit.

  • BostonTeaParty

    yeah but psrhjinian, it didn’t work in london, it hasn’t kept vehicles out or fund the public transport sufficiently as the company that ran it burnt through most of the money generated. It was just another tax as livingstone has just admitted!

  • Facebook User

    Believe it or not, the tax would have applied to less pricey cars than Porsches, BMW 7 series, etc. It’s just that Porsche was the only one to stand up to them.

    I particularly like how Mr. Livingstone referred to it as a “scheme.” :-0

  • Armando Muir
    quasimondo

    On a side note, I wonder if Mayor Bloomberg is secretly irked by the fact that high gasoline costs was able to do what his own failed congestion pricing plan couldn’t.

  • Ron LARSON
    yankinwaoz

    Lumbergh21,

    “Scheme” is not Boris, it is used all over the Commonwealth. And unlike in the US, it does not convey any negative connotation. In the UK, it is a benign word, just like the word “program” would be in the US.

    So don’t read anything into that word. It’s just not there in this context. It took me a while to stop snickering in Australia whenever I saw government “schemes” being discussed.

  • psarhjinian


    it didn’t work in london, it hasn’t kept vehicles out or fund the public transport sufficiently as the company that ran it burnt through most of the money generated. It was just another tax as livingstone has just admitted!

    Not true. It has reduced congestion, and it is not revenue-negative; it did produce a surplus. If it hadn’t, Livingstone wouldn’t have said that losing it would deny London revenue.

    Admittedly from Wikipedia:

    Livingstone introduced the London congestion charge with the purpose of reducing traffic congestion in central London. Since being introduced the charge has proved to be controversial, though Transport for London maintains that traffic has fallen by 20% within the charge zone since the scheme began. One reason for the controversy is that whilst the scheme has been lucrative for its private-sector operator, Capita, some critics argue it has failed to raise the promised levels of funding for public transport as costs eat up the revenue.

    Capita did make money on it, that’s true, but it isn’t a black hole as some contend It just didn’t make as much money as it might have if it was publicly managed. Of course, it might not have made any money at all, given how badly over-budget some projects go.

    Point is, it did work, and it was helping the city’s infrastructure and it affected, for the most part, people who drive through some of the most expensive parts of the city and could pay the tax.

    Porsche complained because, well, guess where Porsche’s clients live? Combined with Porsche’s status as purveyor of discretionary toys for the well off, you can see why they might object.

  • DearS

    Government loves to steal it seems. Paying Porsche’s fee seems that way. While Porsche is seemingly acting greedy again.

    People need a guide to overcoming ignorance and fear. Although I guess they may not realize that till the shit really hits the fan. I wonder.

    Isn’t obvious that ignorance and fear is at the middle of all that is uncomfortable with the world. Fear Fear fear, Ignorance Ignorance Ignorance. Its a painful cycle. Being indifferent does not work either. Its just empty. Balance is key.

    Well I’m happy. I have fears to overcome and opportunities to enjoy myself. Lets no worry about what we do not have today and enjoy our lives. Greed be forgotten.

  • duane brosky
    GS650G

    Finally a politician delivers. I can’t wait to see what Boris does next.

  • BostonTeaParty

    psar, you believe everything on wiki?! do a search on increase in travel times within the zone, pollution levels, the return to pre charge levels of traffic volume and loss of business, smaller business since its implementation.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You can also login using Facebook Connect. Connect with Facebook

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Karmann Lives, Kindof

    Robert.Walter - Thanks.  FYI, I wasn’t using firefox.  Usually use MSIE, but this time was using Chrome.
  • Re: SS Is Alive. Should Anyone Care?

    don1967 - The 1990s Imapala SS probably was the last real “SS” GM ever produced… it was certainly closer to the original theme than anything since.  ...
  • Re: Karmann Lives, Kindof

    mpresley - VW means many things.  is a Karmann Cayman in the works?
  • Re: Wild-Ass Rumor Of The Day: Brilliance Buying Dealers, Saturn Brand For US Launch?

    don1967 - I am not one to dismiss the Chinese lightly, but “Brilliance buying Saturn” does sound a bit like an...
  • Re: Will The Prius Usurp The Camry?

    PeteMoran - Just keep repeating it, ad nauseum.   You haven’t used “Golf Cart” for a while, so I guess you’re trying to mix it up.
  • Re: Review: Ford SVT Raptor

    ctoan - I hate it less than a Hummer, I’ll say that much.  At least it’s designed for fun.  People don’t have enough fun.
  • Re: Will The Prius Usurp The Camry?

    don1967 - David, I do agree that there is some ingenuity, namely in the recapturing of kinetic energy vs. converting it to waste heat.   There’s just something...
  • Re: Karmann Lives, Kindof

    th009 - The question I wonder about is what will VW build there?  2011 is not far away, so it has to be a model well along in development.  But 1000 people means a low-volume...
  • Re: Will The Prius Usurp The Camry?

    don1967 - In the crazy world of the hybrid sceptic, fighting wars and having the entire economy beholden to the will of oil owners is a good thing. These people should be...
  • Re: Karmann Lives, Kindof

    Bertel Schmitt - As for the Schnäppchen (bargain-basement price): The owners wanted €60m, VW didn’t want to pay more than half. Apparently, there was  no other bidder. Car...

 


Auto Insurance GPS Navigation
Car Loans Auto Parts
Car Warranty Wheels
Automotive Tires Car Care