<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BMW X5 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:38:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug Dolde</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-38959</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Dolde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 19:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-38959</guid>
		<description>So what&#039;s it gor the my Jeep Liberty doesnt besides a 2x price tag?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->So what&#8217;s it gor the my Jeep Liberty doesnt besides a 2x price tag?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tincanman99</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-24747</link>
		<dc:creator>tincanman99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-24747</guid>
		<description>Yippee, another SUV for affluent soccer moms! I am beyond excited. More electronic junk to break. 

Does it come in 13 shades of silver/gray?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Yippee, another SUV for affluent soccer moms! I am beyond excited. More electronic junk to break. </p>
<p>Does it come in 13 shades of silver/gray?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny Lieberman</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23476</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny Lieberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 19:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23476</guid>
		<description>In Europe there is a GL500.

No plans yet for an AMG version. Yet.

That said, the regular Yank edition GL450 is amazingly fast/fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->In Europe there is a GL500.</p>
<p>No plans yet for an AMG version. Yet.</p>
<p>That said, the regular Yank edition GL450 is amazingly fast/fun.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23470</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 19:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23470</guid>
		<description>Will they make an AMG GL63? Sounds more Jay&#039;s speed....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Will they make an AMG GL63? Sounds more Jay&#8217;s speed&#8230;.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny Lieberman</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23457</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny Lieberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 18:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23457</guid>
		<description>Like all great thoughts, it hit me this morning in the shower.

Jay -- MB GL450

It is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Like all great thoughts, it hit me this morning in the shower.</p>
<p>Jay &#8212; MB GL450</p>
<p>It is good.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodster205</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23421</link>
		<dc:creator>rodster205</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 16:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23421</guid>
		<description>ash78:

The flashing third brake lights on hondas &amp; mazdas around Birmingham came from some of the local dealers that sold them as &quot;safety&quot; options, from $50-100 per depending on how stupid you looked.  You probably saw them on a number of Miatas around town also.   After having numerous friends get rear-ended (while stopped) in their Miatas we came up with that as a way to make them more visible when stopped, which is an obvious problem with Miatas.  

I figured out how to wire a $10 turn signal flasher to work with most cars third brake lights and sold them to everyone in the Miata club at cost.  In about 4 years of 30+ Miatas running them not a single one got rear ended.  

I think there are a few places on the net where you can buy a manufactured unit that will blink the third brake light, and some that will blink a few times and then go solid.  I have seen some motorcycles do this. The Hoover PD uses them on the brake lights on their police cycles also, I think they realize the importance of that extra visibility.

Of course most people hate them when they see them on someone else&#039;s car, they think they are annoying and distracting.   Some have questioned the legality, which is valid except here in Alabama and other states with NO inspection it isn&#039;t an issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->ash78:</p>
<p>The flashing third brake lights on hondas &amp; mazdas around Birmingham came from some of the local dealers that sold them as &#8220;safety&#8221; options, from $50-100 per depending on how stupid you looked.  You probably saw them on a number of Miatas around town also.   After having numerous friends get rear-ended (while stopped) in their Miatas we came up with that as a way to make them more visible when stopped, which is an obvious problem with Miatas.  </p>
<p>I figured out how to wire a $10 turn signal flasher to work with most cars third brake lights and sold them to everyone in the Miata club at cost.  In about 4 years of 30+ Miatas running them not a single one got rear ended.  </p>
<p>I think there are a few places on the net where you can buy a manufactured unit that will blink the third brake light, and some that will blink a few times and then go solid.  I have seen some motorcycles do this. The Hoover PD uses them on the brake lights on their police cycles also, I think they realize the importance of that extra visibility.</p>
<p>Of course most people hate them when they see them on someone else&#8217;s car, they think they are annoying and distracting.   Some have questioned the legality, which is valid except here in Alabama and other states with NO inspection it isn&#8217;t an issue.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23414</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 16:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23414</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Eric Miller wrote:“The MDX is fantastic, but the Lambdas are at least 90+% as good for less than 90% the price. I was impressed, as my TTAC review (and this comment) shows.”

jthorner wrote: Why can’t GM produce a 110% as good vehicle instead of another 90% effort? 

Almost as good and a bit cheaper is not a prescription for greatness or success. Once you factor in the difference in resale values the bargain priced GM vehicle isn’t a bargain. &lt;/em&gt;


Outlook vs MDX

They&#039;re much more similar than one would think
Tire size, track, and suspension set ups are similar

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Outlook beats MDX on:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

Useable third row seating (+4&quot; leg/ +3&quot; head/ +5&quot; hip)
Access to the third row is larger and easier
3 passenger third row (vs 2 pass MDX)
Available center-row buckets
More cargo space (max 116.9 vs 83.5 MDX)
Large fixed-panel rear sunroof
Factory remote start
Available in front wheel drive (MDX is AWD only)
Touch-screen use of nav/audio (both are voice)
Heated windshield washers
DOHC with continous phasing int/exh (vs SOHC VTEC MDX)
6 speed automatic (vs MDX 5spd)
2-3 mpg better fuel economy, despite its increased size
Uses regular unleaded (vs Premium MDX)
10.5&quot; longer wheelbase for better ride, larger door openings
Available 19&quot; wheels (18 only MDX)
100,000 mile powertrain warranty (vs 70K MDX)
&lt;strong&gt;$4400 price advantage &lt;/strong&gt; option-for-option

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;MDX beats Outlook on:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

25 hp / 25 lbs-ft advantage (300/275 MDX vs 275/251 OL)
250 pound weight advantage
1/2 second advantage zero-to-sixty
Available GM/Delphi magnetic ride w/ Sport (~$2000 more)
SH-AWD is more sophisticated and improves handling
Blue-Tooth interface (std) and available DVD audio
Available heated seating for second row (front only OL)
8-way power passenger&#039;s seat (vs 4-way OL)
Power tilt and telescope steering column (non-power OL)
Real-time traffic and Zagat with optional navigation
LED taillights
Better standard warranty (4/50 vs 3/36 OL)

Every feature not discussed here is available or equal on both
That&#039;s the list. (Micheal Karesh may do it better)

Whether the $4400 is worth it is a personal call. 
The biggest difference is size. It may be important to some, a detriment to others.
Resale value is conjecture as neither have been projected by ALG. Saturn has historically done very well (#1 domestic) and so has Acura (#5 luxury).

CSJohnston brought up the Acadia and Enclave, and yes, the Enclave will fill the feature gaps including second row heated seats, better ride (maybe air or magnetic), same 4/50 basic warranty, and add features like heads-up display, double-pane &#039;quiet tuned&#039; side windows and acoustic windshield, etc. Enclave may also be the first Lambda to feature GM&#039;s direct injection version of the 3.6L HF reported to be 304-320hp (we&#039;ll see it in the new CTS at Detroit IAS). Enclave, however, will be priced with MDX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Eric Miller wrote:“The MDX is fantastic, but the Lambdas are at least 90+% as good for less than 90% the price. I was impressed, as my TTAC review (and this comment) shows.”</p>
<p>jthorner wrote: Why can’t GM produce a 110% as good vehicle instead of another 90% effort? </p>
<p>Almost as good and a bit cheaper is not a prescription for greatness or success. Once you factor in the difference in resale values the bargain priced GM vehicle isn’t a bargain. </em></p>
<p>Outlook vs MDX</p>
<p>They&#8217;re much more similar than one would think<br />
Tire size, track, and suspension set ups are similar</p>
<p><strong><em>Outlook beats MDX on:</em></strong></p>
<p>Useable third row seating (+4&#8243; leg/ +3&#8243; head/ +5&#8243; hip)<br />
Access to the third row is larger and easier<br />
3 passenger third row (vs 2 pass MDX)<br />
Available center-row buckets<br />
More cargo space (max 116.9 vs 83.5 MDX)<br />
Large fixed-panel rear sunroof<br />
Factory remote start<br />
Available in front wheel drive (MDX is AWD only)<br />
Touch-screen use of nav/audio (both are voice)<br />
Heated windshield washers<br />
DOHC with continous phasing int/exh (vs SOHC VTEC MDX)<br />
6 speed automatic (vs MDX 5spd)<br />
2-3 mpg better fuel economy, despite its increased size<br />
Uses regular unleaded (vs Premium MDX)<br />
10.5&#8243; longer wheelbase for better ride, larger door openings<br />
Available 19&#8243; wheels (18 only MDX)<br />
100,000 mile powertrain warranty (vs 70K MDX)<br />
<strong>$4400 price advantage </strong> option-for-option</p>
<p><strong><em>MDX beats Outlook on:</em></strong></p>
<p>25 hp / 25 lbs-ft advantage (300/275 MDX vs 275/251 OL)<br />
250 pound weight advantage<br />
1/2 second advantage zero-to-sixty<br />
Available GM/Delphi magnetic ride w/ Sport (~$2000 more)<br />
SH-AWD is more sophisticated and improves handling<br />
Blue-Tooth interface (std) and available DVD audio<br />
Available heated seating for second row (front only OL)<br />
8-way power passenger&#8217;s seat (vs 4-way OL)<br />
Power tilt and telescope steering column (non-power OL)<br />
Real-time traffic and Zagat with optional navigation<br />
LED taillights<br />
Better standard warranty (4/50 vs 3/36 OL)</p>
<p>Every feature not discussed here is available or equal on both<br />
That&#8217;s the list. (Micheal Karesh may do it better)</p>
<p>Whether the $4400 is worth it is a personal call.<br />
The biggest difference is size. It may be important to some, a detriment to others.<br />
Resale value is conjecture as neither have been projected by ALG. Saturn has historically done very well (#1 domestic) and so has Acura (#5 luxury).</p>
<p>CSJohnston brought up the Acadia and Enclave, and yes, the Enclave will fill the feature gaps including second row heated seats, better ride (maybe air or magnetic), same 4/50 basic warranty, and add features like heads-up display, double-pane &#8216;quiet tuned&#8217; side windows and acoustic windshield, etc. Enclave may also be the first Lambda to feature GM&#8217;s direct injection version of the 3.6L HF reported to be 304-320hp (we&#8217;ll see it in the new CTS at Detroit IAS). Enclave, however, will be priced with MDX.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CSJohnston</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23413</link>
		<dc:creator>CSJohnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 16:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23413</guid>
		<description>Perhaps we should compare apples to apples.  The Buick Enclave is the appropraite unit to go against MDX and the RX&#039;s.

Outlook and the GMC Acadia should be lined up against Pilot and Highlander.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Perhaps we should compare apples to apples.  The Buick Enclave is the appropraite unit to go against MDX and the RX&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Outlook and the GMC Acadia should be lined up against Pilot and Highlander.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jthorner</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23390</link>
		<dc:creator>jthorner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23390</guid>
		<description>&quot;The MDX is fantastic, but the Lambdas are at least 90+% as good for less than 90% the price. I was impressed, as my TTAC review (and this comment) shows.&quot;

Why can&#039;t GM produce a 110% as good vehicle instead of another 90% effort?    

Almost as good and a bit cheaper is not a prescription for greatness or success.  Once you factor in the difference in resale values the bargain priced GM vehicle isn&#039;t a bargain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8220;The MDX is fantastic, but the Lambdas are at least 90+% as good for less than 90% the price. I was impressed, as my TTAC review (and this comment) shows.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t GM produce a 110% as good vehicle instead of another 90% effort?    </p>
<p>Almost as good and a bit cheaper is not a prescription for greatness or success.  Once you factor in the difference in resale values the bargain priced GM vehicle isn&#8217;t a bargain.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23355</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 12:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23355</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Linus:  The new X5 DOES have a full-sized spare.
&lt;/em&gt;
Not according to the BMW web site.  It states the X5 comes with &quot;run-flat all-season tires&quot; and a &quot;space saver spare tire&quot; that is &quot;not available with optional 3rd row seat.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Linus:  The new X5 DOES have a full-sized spare.<br />
</em><br />
Not according to the BMW web site.  It states the X5 comes with &#8220;run-flat all-season tires&#8221; and a &#8220;space saver spare tire&#8221; that is &#8220;not available with optional 3rd row seat.&#8221;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koobah</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23339</link>
		<dc:creator>koobah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 07:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23339</guid>
		<description>How about the new MDX review? Just get one with the sports package at least. I know that the new MDX with active suspension handles better than my 03 &#039;4.6is X5 (a $70+k car), but I wonder how it stacks up against the new X5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->How about the new MDX review? Just get one with the sports package at least. I know that the new MDX with active suspension handles better than my 03 &#8216;4.6is X5 (a $70+k car), but I wonder how it stacks up against the new X5.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23336</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 06:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23336</guid>
		<description>Is anyone going to make use of that ground clearance with those wheels? Deliberately, I mean, not because they thought their AWD-mobile stops or turns better in the snow than a car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Is anyone going to make use of that ground clearance with those wheels? Deliberately, I mean, not because they thought their AWD-mobile stops or turns better in the snow than a car.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheezeweggie</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23331</link>
		<dc:creator>cheezeweggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 04:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23331</guid>
		<description>The side view looks way too much like a Hyundai SantaFe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The side view looks way too much like a Hyundai SantaFe.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23330</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 04:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23330</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;You just cannot find and beat the MDX’s features anywhere else for the price.&lt;/em&gt;

GM benchmarked the previous generation MDX when they developed the Lambda large CUVs (Outlook, Acadia, Enclave). Please don&#039;t laugh when I suggest that they come pretty close to the new one as well. Believe it or not, they also offer more features. I have driven both. The MDX is fantastic, but the Lambdas are at least 90+% as good for less than 90% the price. I was impressed, as my TTAC review (and this comment) shows.

Flame suit on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>You just cannot find and beat the MDX’s features anywhere else for the price.</em></p>
<p>GM benchmarked the previous generation MDX when they developed the Lambda large CUVs (Outlook, Acadia, Enclave). Please don&#8217;t laugh when I suggest that they come pretty close to the new one as well. Believe it or not, they also offer more features. I have driven both. The MDX is fantastic, but the Lambdas are at least 90+% as good for less than 90% the price. I was impressed, as my TTAC review (and this comment) shows.</p>
<p>Flame suit on.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koobah</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23321</link>
		<dc:creator>koobah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 03:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23321</guid>
		<description>Why so many people are bashing SUV&#039;s, complaining about their lack of off-road capability? 99.9% of the time they&#039;re driven on-road, making off road suspension unnecessary. If you need off road capability, get a Wrangler or Land Rover. I owned 4 BMW&#039;s, three of them were M3&#039;s which I found very impractical for daily use. I now drive 4.6is X5 and the reason I do is because I enjoy better visibility (which is a big plus considering the amount of tall SUV&#039;s stuck in big city traffic jams), more convenient and comfortable seating position, better winter traction, greater sense of safey and more utility than a regular sedan. No, I don&#039;t like the expensive gas pump visits, but alternatives are also compromises.
Said all that, I am getting ready to trade in the X5 and started looking around, so I test drove few cars very recently. I am most impressed with the new MDX. You just cannot find and beat the MDX&#039;s features anywhere else for the price. The similarly equipped ML is close to $20k. Add to that the infamous reliability and constant bugs many ML owners are complaining on MB forums and the MDX is the clear winner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Why so many people are bashing SUV&#8217;s, complaining about their lack of off-road capability? 99.9% of the time they&#8217;re driven on-road, making off road suspension unnecessary. If you need off road capability, get a Wrangler or Land Rover. I owned 4 BMW&#8217;s, three of them were M3&#8217;s which I found very impractical for daily use. I now drive 4.6is X5 and the reason I do is because I enjoy better visibility (which is a big plus considering the amount of tall SUV&#8217;s stuck in big city traffic jams), more convenient and comfortable seating position, better winter traction, greater sense of safey and more utility than a regular sedan. No, I don&#8217;t like the expensive gas pump visits, but alternatives are also compromises.<br />
Said all that, I am getting ready to trade in the X5 and started looking around, so I test drove few cars very recently. I am most impressed with the new MDX. You just cannot find and beat the MDX&#8217;s features anywhere else for the price. The similarly equipped ML is close to $20k. Add to that the infamous reliability and constant bugs many ML owners are complaining on MB forums and the MDX is the clear winner.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linus</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23320</link>
		<dc:creator>Linus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 03:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23320</guid>
		<description>The new X5 DOES have a full-sized spare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The new X5 DOES have a full-sized spare.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CSJohnston</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23317</link>
		<dc:creator>CSJohnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 03:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23317</guid>
		<description>Alright, how come no one mentions the well-reviewed Cadillac SRX as a competitor to the X5?

Good power from the V6, three rows of seating, by all accounts a good handling, all-weather machine, decent luxury credentials, etc.

I&#039;ve only driven the V6 model once (I have only driven the V8 X5) but I was pleased with how it felt and drove.

The interior is redesigned, has an SRX faced the cold, hard, caustic light of a TTAC review?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Alright, how come no one mentions the well-reviewed Cadillac SRX as a competitor to the X5?</p>
<p>Good power from the V6, three rows of seating, by all accounts a good handling, all-weather machine, decent luxury credentials, etc.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve only driven the V6 model once (I have only driven the V8 X5) but I was pleased with how it felt and drove.</p>
<p>The interior is redesigned, has an SRX faced the cold, hard, caustic light of a TTAC review?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CSJohnston</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23315</link>
		<dc:creator>CSJohnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 03:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23315</guid>
		<description>I think SUV&#039;s prescribe to the &quot;longer, lower, wider&quot; formula for redesign (was that a Harely Earl maxim?).  

Every succeeding generation has to be &quot;less filling and tastes great&quot;.  

If I remember one of my product lectures on the Escape in `01, the difference between the interior seating space between it and its Explorer contemporary were quite close.

As a matter of fact, when the `02 Exploder came out, many owners traded into Escapes rather than keep with the new Explorer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I think SUV&#8217;s prescribe to the &#8220;longer, lower, wider&#8221; formula for redesign (was that a Harely Earl maxim?).  </p>
<p>Every succeeding generation has to be &#8220;less filling and tastes great&#8221;.  </p>
<p>If I remember one of my product lectures on the Escape in `01, the difference between the interior seating space between it and its Explorer contemporary were quite close.</p>
<p>As a matter of fact, when the `02 Exploder came out, many owners traded into Escapes rather than keep with the new Explorer.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macarose</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23312</link>
		<dc:creator>macarose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 02:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23312</guid>
		<description>As a rejoinder to what&#039;s happened in virtually all car/truck market segments, these compact SUV&#039;s are just about the same size as the midsized SUV&#039;s of 8 years ago.

In my opinion it&#039;s not a matter of the Escape, CR-V, and RAV4 offering a &#039;smaller&#039; alternative. It&#039;s the fact that the Explorer, Passport/Rodeo, and 4Runner simply became too generic, stodgy and long in the tooth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->As a rejoinder to what&#8217;s happened in virtually all car/truck market segments, these compact SUV&#8217;s are just about the same size as the midsized SUV&#8217;s of 8 years ago.</p>
<p>In my opinion it&#8217;s not a matter of the Escape, CR-V, and RAV4 offering a &#8217;smaller&#8217; alternative. It&#8217;s the fact that the Explorer, Passport/Rodeo, and 4Runner simply became too generic, stodgy and long in the tooth.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Farago</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23310</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Farago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 02:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23310</guid>
		<description>In most cases, we use stock photography, provided by the manufacturer (one way or another).

These are stock shots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->In most cases, we use stock photography, provided by the manufacturer (one way or another).</p>
<p>These are stock shots.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruno</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23307</link>
		<dc:creator>bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 02:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23307</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m new to this site.  Where are the [file] photos?  All I see are the pictures above which look German to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;m new to this site.  Where are the [file] photos?  All I see are the pictures above which look German to me.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23306</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 02:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23306</guid>
		<description>Check out the plates in the [file] photos. 
I don&#039;t think Jay drove the X5 in Germany</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Check out the plates in the [file] photos.<br />
I don&#8217;t think Jay drove the X5 in Germany<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruno</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23302</link>
		<dc:creator>bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23302</guid>
		<description>I believe the X5 comes with 18&#039;s standard. Those wheels look like the optional 19&#039;s or 20&#039;s, which have a very low profile tire, that could explain some of the harsh ride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I believe the X5 comes with 18&#8217;s standard. Those wheels look like the optional 19&#8217;s or 20&#8217;s, which have a very low profile tire, that could explain some of the harsh ride.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23300</link>
		<dc:creator>mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23300</guid>
		<description>Thats a good looking SUV.One question is that full frame body on chassis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Thats a good looking SUV.One question is that full frame body on chassis?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bmw-x5/comment-page-2/#comment-23298</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2723#comment-23298</guid>
		<description>Porsche Cayenne Turbo (S)

Fun to drive, horrible to own</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Porsche Cayenne Turbo (S)</p>
<p>Fun to drive, horrible to own<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 31/138 queries in 0.134 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 15:40:06 -->