Biller Secret Toyota Documents "Published Material"; Pissing Match Breaks Out In Congress

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer

Instead of solving the truly pressing needs of the land, Republicans and Democrats are publicly squabbling over the relevance and veracity of the Biller “smoking gun” documents that claim to prove that Toyota hid safety problems. U.S. Rep. Edolphus Towns, D-N.Y., chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, sent a letter on Feb. 26 to Yoshimi Inaba, president and chief executive officer of Toyota Motor North America Inc., that said the documents provided “evidence that Toyota deliberately withheld relevant electronic records that it was legally required to produce” in lawsuits. Towns went on to say that the documents “shed some light on Toyota’s handling of the sudden unintended acceleration problem” and “indicate a systematic disregard for the law. Not so, says U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-California. And he has a smoking gun of his own:

In a response dated March 2, Issa wrote that Towns’ conclusions were based on “conjecture and altered quotations” and that Towns’ letter “frequently misquotes and mischaracterizes” the documents. From a law.com article:

Issa cited Dallas plaintiffs attorney Todd Tracy, who reopened 17 personal injury cases based on Biller’s claims but voluntarily dismissed them after reviewing the documents. Tracy said that they failed to reveal any “concealment, destruction, or pattern of discovery abuse…In a telephone interview on Thursday, Tracy told The National Law Journal that Issa’s characterization was correct. One box contained 15 copies of the same deposition, Tracy said. Another contained research about bringing a wrongful termination suit. Tracey found 50 copies of Biller’s resume and e-mails that Biller wrote to colleagues, but no replies. “These were supposed to be the hottest documents in the history of jurisprudence, the way they were portrayed,” Tracy said. “The material was published material. Give me a break.”

In many years of litigating against Toyota, Tracy said, he never had any trouble securing discovery material. “I never had any trouble getting it at all,” Tracy said.

Towns had his comeback: “Mr. Issa’s comments do not address the central issue — has Toyota been illegally withholding documents for years. We need to continue cutting through the smokescreen put up by Toyota and keep our eyes on the ball.” Leave it to a congressman to use the word “smokescreen” with meaning.

Paul Niedermeyer
Paul Niedermeyer

More by Paul Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 14 comments
  • Mungooz Mungooz on Mar 06, 2010

    Why is it so difficult for the brain dead Republican commenters here and elsewhere to understand that the Toyota "mysterious" acceleration recalls are newsworthy because the alleged problem(s) are killing people? A recall mandated because a window doesn't roll down is not equally important. What is it with these conspiracy nuts? The UAW, in concert with Detroit's salvaged manufacturers, have conjured up this controversy? Get real. Geez! And that Issa guy, I wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him.

  • Kendahl Kendahl on Mar 06, 2010

    "Pissing match" conjures up a different picture.

  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Next