Bailout Watch 574: President Obama on Chrysler, GM Bailouts: "We'll Get Our Money Back"

by Robert Farago

Published: July 30th, 2009

bailout watch 574 president obama on chrysler gm bailouts we ll get our money

Words are cheap. Detroit bailouts are expensive; the feds have spent more than $100 billion on the Motown meltdown. But don’t worry. Be happy. According to Reuters, “President Barack Obama said on Wednesday that General Motors and Chrysler Group were companies worth saving, but he expects both to repay their government loans.” But? The Prez made his prediction to celebrate the latest stats from the car buyers’ bailout (a.k.a. Cash-for-Clunkers or C.A.R.S. program). Even Reuters isn’t buying that one—much. Apparently, it’s all about the mix. “The impact on GM, Chrysler and Ford Motor was not immediately clear with passenger car sales outpacing those of pickups and sport utilities.” Translation: the Big Three need pickup and SUV sales to survive. Fair dinkum, albeit on a very, very small scale in this case. It gets better/worse . . .

“If GM and Chrysler were willing to do what was necessary to make themselves competitive and if taxpayers were repaid every dime they put on the line, it was a process worth supporting,” Obama said in Raleigh, North Carolina.

“We saved hundreds of thousands of jobs as a result and expect to get our money back.”

Funny, I thought the bailout helped Chrysler and GM cut jobs. Oh wait; I remember: the federal money allowed them to cut jobs with big buyout packages, paid for by the U.S. taxpayer. No, that’s not it. I mean it is, but ALL those jobs would have disappeared completely without the bailout. Right? Total economic catastrophe. That kind of thing.

As much as I like the word “if” (it’s so much more realistic than “Yes we can!”), three questions. First, who decided “what was necessary”? Second, how much faith do we have in them? And third, what are the odds the automakers will repay every dime “invested” Chrysler and GM?

Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 15 comments

PeteMoran on Jul 30, 2009

With "The Rat" Rattner standing in that pic and what I thought was a scuba tank to the right, I assumed all those people were REALLY short....

Like Reply
U mad scientist on Jul 31, 2009
This is what we get for electing a president who has NO knowledge of economics. Has he ever said one word or made one decision to make you think otherwise? That's particularly cute coming from people who've demonstrably NEVER taken an econ class (or even read the entry on wikipedia for that matte). If there's to be serious criticism of the pres, and not cheap pot shots, it's going to be how our political process is systematically beholden to the interests of the wealthy over the interests of the little people. Notice how when a worker who actually produces something worthwhile gets tens of thousands of dollars, it's political pandemonium, and when goldman pays out hundreds of thousands to the paper pushers who creates the mess, nobody questions the people who bring about the kind of fake wealth that leeches off everyone else. - Currently, Chairman Hu Jintao is less of a dictator in China than Obama is one in the US. That's funny. Really, no one else plays in the big leagues of massive corruption like the chinese communist party. Do you think ANYONE in that cabal stands a chance, however minute, of getting elected?

Like Reply

Recent Comments

SCE to AUX All that lift makes for an easy rollover of your $70k truck.
SCE to AUX My son cross-shopped the RAV4 and Model Y, then bought the Y. To their surprise, they hated the RAV4.
SCE to AUX I'm already driving the cheap EV (19 Ioniq EV).$30k MSRP in late 2018, $23k after subsidy at lease (no tax hassle)$549/year insurance$40 in electricity to drive 1000 miles/month66k miles, no range lossAffordable 16" tiresVirtually no maintenance expensesHyundai (for example) has dramatically cut prices on their EVs, so you can get a 361-mile Ioniq 6 in the high 30s right now.But ask me if I'd go to the Subaru brand if one was affordable, and the answer is no.
David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.