The weekend talkers are going all-Motown all the time, as Dems talk up their bailout plans and Republicans show off some freshly-developed backbone. And if you talk about Detroit long enough, some nasty things are going to be said. “They’re not building the right products,” Alabama Senator Richard Shelby told Meet The Press (via AP). “They’ve got good workers but I don’t believe they’ve got good management. They don’t innovate. They’re a dinosaur in a sense.” And Shelby, the senior Republican on the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, doesn’t give money to dinosaurs. “Companies fail every day and others take their place. I think this is a road we should not go down,” he said. The second ranking Republican in the Senate, Jon Kyl (R-AZ), agrees. “Just giving them $25 billion doesn’t change anything. It just puts off for six months or so the day of reckoning,” Kyl told Fox News. Isn’t it amazing what losing a few elections will do to a party’s sense of principle? Of course, the Rs are running downhill on this issue too. All they have to do is delay bridge loans until Obama is sworn in, and the question will become moot as the automakers run out of cash. And they’ll be scoring populist points (at least with us) every step of the way.
6 Comments on “Bailout Watch 196: The Battle Lines Are Drawn Pt. 2...”
Back to TopLeave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You can also login using Facebook Connect.
I saw the Meet the Press debate and their round table with talking heads Tom Friedman first and foremost. While I agree with Shelby, I couldn’t help but wonder what color his Mercedes ML-Class is.
Over on ABC, George Will was outnumbered by Paul Krugeman, Mr. Donaldson and Mrs. Roberts on the issue but put up a good fight.
Funny, because the Republicans were perfectly willing to shill for corporate interests, even going as far as to promote CEOs into public offices that are supposed to watchdog the companies and industries they work for – like banks and credit agencies for example – for the good of the taxpayer, you see. Now all the sudden it’s a bad thing? Did losing the election help them find their conscience all the sudden or are they just playing partisan games as usual?
I should probably put a disclaimer that I’m against ANY bailouts of any corporations and I’m also a registered independent, lest anyone think I’m letting the Democrats off the hook. I just find this “change of heart” you guys are championing extremely suspicious.
It certainly doesn’t hurt the Republicans that most of GM, Ford and Chrysler are based in “blue” states and a primary benefactor of any bailout is the UAW.
Shelby wants C11 for GM, and it is a doomed option. Shelby probably knows it and thinks it’s a foregone conclusion that GM will fail, with or without C11. I’m in favor of a lifeline for GM until late 2010. By that time, GM will have engineered its own fate.
Wagoner can improve GM’s chances by resigning. If he really believes a bridge loan of 1-2 years will be enough, he should be far more transparent with his strategy.
Shelby’s just reppin his non-unionized hood.
Alabama Senator Richard Shelby
err, didn’t Hyundai just build a factory in Alabama?
Just as Carl Levin defends his peeps, so Richard Shelby defends his.