Home » News Blog » New Cars » Baby Rolls: So Not A BMW

Baby Rolls: So Not A BMW

By Justin Berkowitz
February 13, 2008 -

6_rolls_royce_phantom_2405.jpgRolls Royce has provided "an exclusive group of journalists" (and Motor Trend) details of the previously announced $250k to $300k "baby" Rolls. BMW's minions said the new Roller won't share the Phantom's V12 engine, nor any engine currently powering a BMW. And that's about it. But it's a good thing, not a bad thing. Despite Bentley's VW Phaeton underpinnings, the new Rolls is positioning itself much higher in the food chain. To do so successfully, it needs its own platform and engine to keep the BMW brand's new money stench at bay. Rollers are nothing if not exclusive. That's why hundreds (dozens?) of wealthy motorists (expensive hotels?) pay full price (minus discount) for a new, customized Phantom (not Phaeton) rather than, say, buying a loaded Phantom with 8000 miles at a 40% discount. The rumors say Rolls' second post-Bimmer model will get a new V12 with north of 500 horsepower. Let's just hope it's doesn't turn out to be a hybrid or anything else less maniacal. On the other hand, if BMW muffs the "baby" Roller, it could be a bonus. The brand's "entry level" model will then be just as absurdly, ludicrously overpriced and rare as its big brother. In fact, even if this new model outpaces Phantom sales by 100 percent, we're still talking Magna Carta-levels of exclusivity. However unintentionally. 

Motor Trend »

8 Comments on “ Baby Rolls: So Not A BMW ”



Leave a Reply Back to Top


You must be logged in to post a comment.

Vehicle 1  
Vehicle 2  
 
Pricing engine provided by TrueDelta.

Top Articles

New Content Feeds

Bookmark This Post

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

© 2004 - 2008 The Truth About Cars | Terms & Conditions | POWERED