Cadillac Leads the Way

William C Montgomery
by William C Montgomery

Congratulations Cadillac. The GM brand scooped first place in BusinessWeek’s first-ever ranking for the best provider of automotive related customer service. Overall, the wreathed ones placed third, surpassed only by insurance company USAA and Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts. From its lofty perch near the top the elite twenty-five, Cadillac can look down upon such notable companies such as Starbucks (tenth), Southwest Airlines (thirteenth), and Apple (eighteenth). Caddy’s kudos offer beleaguered GM supporters a much needed glimmer of hope.

Of course, Cadillac is not the only automaker on BusinessWeek’s Customer Service Elite list. Lexus ranked seventh. Porsche staked its position on the leader board in seventeenth position. Buick and Lincoln round out the list in twenty-fourth and twenty-fifth places. Cadillac trumped its rivals with an A+ score for process (i.e. warrantees, service policies, etc.) and an A+ for its staff’s friendliness and conscientiousness.

BusinessWeek’s scoring system was based primarily– but not exclusively– upon data provided by J.D. Power & Associates. BusinessWeek aggregated 2006 J.D. Power customer service scores with their own survey data, weighted each company’s score based upon their prominence within their respective industry, and eliminated niche players and small-time operators. Companies such as Jetblue were also eliminated from the list based on recent unfavorable information.

As TTAC contributor Michael Karesh will tell you, that’s a lot of statistical tomfoolery. Even so, BusinessWeek’s conclusions are legitimate enough for water cooler analysis.

When not engaging in automotive floccinaucinihilipilification, I work in an industry highly dependent on top-notch customer service. I know first hand that providing class leading service is no accident. My company pays research firms to contact our customers to determine whether or not they’re satisfied with our service. Each month survey results are tracked, analyzed and acted upon by all layers of management.

Cadillac achieved distinction because their service organization is committed to world class customer service. Cadillac developed a strategy for delivering upon that commitment, and executed it.

To wit: last year, Cadillac took a page out of Lexus’ playbook. They empowered their dealers to decide for themselves if The General should honor warranty repairs after the warranty had expired. Additionally and at long last, Caddy now provides loaner cars to all customers while their ride is in the shop.

On the corporate level, Cadillac provides its dealer with large financial incentives– up to $100k per quarter– for maintaining high levels of customer service. Cadillac General Manager James E. Taylor says the program is worth the expense. He says buyers are five times more likely to buy another Caddy if they have a good service experience over a bad one.

You don’t have to be a Corvette owner abused by a Chevrolet dealership to know that Cadillac’s elite customer service status is evidence that there’s healthy tissue amid the gangrene afflicting the General’s seven other domestic limbs. Yet BusinessWeek’s survey results hint at the storm clouds gathering around this silver lining.

While Caddy scored 47 points higher than the auto industry average for customer service, only 51% of survey respondents said that they would definitely recommend the brand to other prospective buyers. By comparison, 79% of USAA customers said they’d recommend the brand. Seventh place Lexus and seventeenth place Porsche outscored Cadillac at 55% each.

This statistic is telling. It examines the composite buying and ownership experience, rather than just satisfaction with service. A person will only recommend the brand if they were also satisfied with the quality, reliability and prestige of the product, and are satisfied that they got a good deal (value).

While there’s no doubt Cadillac dealerships are vigorously pursuing customer service on the sharp end, the brand’s recommendation score is lower because their overall experience is compromised by the oft documented design and (perceived?) reliability woes that continue to plague General Motors.

Cadillac customer service is proof positive that [at least] one cylinder in GM’s corporate engine block is firing, but the company needs to be firing on ALL cylinders to reverse its terminal trajectory.

Customer service honors do nothing to relieve GM from constricting union contracts and burdensome legacy obligations. They don’t cure The General’s dependence upon light trucks. Or improve its ability to produce profitable small cars. Or eliminate its bureaucratic morass. Or prevent corporate bean counters from neutering innovative designs with cheap components. Or help the company divest wayward brands. Or focus its product offerings. Or increase the speed of product improvements.

Anyway, never let it be said that TTAC is incapable of giving any automaker– foreign or domestic– the respect it deserves. Cadillac’s customer service is a shining star in America’s automotive firmament. If General Motors addresses all its other problems with equal determination and commitment, the company might just pull itself out of its death spiral. We can only hope.

[To read the whole "Customer Service Elite" click here.]

William C Montgomery
William C Montgomery

More by William C Montgomery

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 60 comments
  • Johnson Johnson on Mar 01, 2007

    Great news indeed for Cadillac. Too bad Cadillac (car) sales are in the toilet.

  • Anonymous Anonymous on Mar 06, 2007

    My wife has an '03 CTS and I have an '04 SRX and we really have enjoyed both of them. She will definitely be buying an '08 CTS next year and I probably will be buying another SRX in '09 or '10. The service dept in my town is excellent, but the sales dept doesn't seem to try hard enough, so we usually buy elsewhere.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I'd rather they have the old sweep gauges, the hhuuggee left to right speedometer from the 40's and 50's where the needle went from lefty to right like in my 1969 Nova
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
Next