Another Ford Recall: Seats, Seatbelts Could Give Way

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

No automaker remains immune from safety recalls, but Ford Motor Company has had a bad go if it, as the British would say. The latest recall, spanning four models, concerns roughly 117,000 vehicles with potentially faulty anchors for the seats, seatbacks and seatbelts — all things you’d want to work properly in the event of a crash.

The automaker, which recently saw a slew of recalls munch heartily on its corporate profits, claims improperly tempered attachment bolts could cause any of the components to give way during a crash, or even a sudden stop.

While no injuries have been reported from the defective bolts, Ford claims “the structural integrity of the seat or the seatbelt system’s performance may be compromised in a sudden stop or crash, increasing the risk of injury.” As such, it’s calling back four models built between May and June of 2014.

The models include the 2014 Ford F-150, 2014 E-Series van, 2014-2015 Escape, and 2015 Lincoln MKC. As expected, dealers will replace the vehicles’ bad bolts free of charge. Of the total number of North American vehicles flagged for this problem, 94,605 were sold in the U.S. and its territories, with 20,681 sent to Canada and another 1,510 to Mexico.

Ford hasn’t been able to shake a growing list of recalls, with faulty door latches, engine fires, and fragile suspension components exerting pressure on the company’s balance sheet. In the first quarter of 2017, sudden warranty costs stripped $467 million from the automaker’s profits, which sank 35 percent, spooking investors and giving head office more reason to boot former CEO Mark Fields.

The company’s second-quarter performance was a bit rosier. While pretax profit dropped by half a billion dollars, a lower tax rate meant net earnings stayed flat, at $2 billion. This prompted analysts to raise the company’s full-year earnings forecast to a range from $1.65 to $1.85 per share. After years of steady declines, Ford will likely rejoice over any upward direction. Its stock closed the day at $1.18.

[Source: CNBC]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • Rochester I'd rather have a slow-as-mud Plymouth Prowler than this thing. At least the Prowler looked cool.
  • Kcflyer Don't understand the appeal of this engine combo at all.
  • Dave M. This and the HHR were GM's "retro" failures. Not sure what they were smoking....
  • Kcflyer Sorry to see it go. The interior design and color options in particular are rare in the industry
  • Wolfwagen Here is my stable. not great not bad I try to do as much as possible. I work for an Aftermarket automotive parts company so I can get most parts at a discount.i try to do as much of my own work as possible. My wife hates that I spend time and money fixing the vehicles but she doesn't want car payments either so...2019 VW Atlas 50K (wife's) Only issues so far were Brakes and normal maintenance.A Bad Cat Converter which was covered and a replacement of the rear bank head gasket which was a manufacturing defect due to improper torquing at the factory. All under warranty2003 Saab 9-5 Arc Wagon (my DD) 116 K picked up used last year. Replaced Struts, brakes, hatch struts, motor mounts, D/S swaybar link, Timing belt, water pump and thermostat Power steering pump Fuel pump, Both Front window regular rollers, Heater core and cabin air filter. Oil and transmission changes. Love the car but Saab/GM packaging is a nightmare.2005 Cadillac Deville (former DD now Son # 1 DD) picked up used 5 years ago with only 47K now 83K Plugs, coils, P/s pump, Water pump, hoses, P/S lines (mechanic job) evap valve, brakes, Front brake calipers and rear brake calipers. Currently has oil pan gasket leak - looking to have a mechanic do that2009 Mini Cooper (Daughters dd)picked up 2 years ago 67K Brakes and thermostat house to clear check engine light2001 Mazda Tribue (Son#2 dd) 106K picked last summer after he severely damaged a 2004 Hyundai accent. Oil changes
Next