<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $3,200,000,000,000 for an Oil-Free Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:54:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Landcrusher</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-610511</link>
		<dc:creator>Landcrusher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-610511</guid>
		<description>Kevin,

You&#039;re just a realist! Your ideology is blinding you from seeing the truth. You realists should just go back to your caves. Nobody likes you so you must be wrong!

Hehe, seriously though, you nailed it.

97escort,

Let&#039;s assume that we are at peak oil. What course do the peak oil folks then recommend? I say use the oil to make multipliers like solar, wind, nuclear, etc.  Build the infrastructure while we still have oil. I don&#039;t see Gore&#039;s proposal getting us anywhere. Begging people to conform just doesn&#039;t work, and he knows it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Kevin,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re just a realist! Your ideology is blinding you from seeing the truth. You realists should just go back to your caves. Nobody likes you so you must be wrong!</p>
<p>Hehe, seriously though, you nailed it.</p>
<p>97escort,</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume that we are at peak oil. What course do the peak oil folks then recommend? I say use the oil to make multipliers like solar, wind, nuclear, etc.  Build the infrastructure while we still have oil. I don&#8217;t see Gore&#8217;s proposal getting us anywhere. Begging people to conform just doesn&#8217;t work, and he knows it.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 97escort</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-609552</link>
		<dc:creator>97escort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-609552</guid>
		<description>While Peak Oil is here, there is no need to try to completely eliminate the use of oil.  There will always be some oil available albeit at a very high price.

The important concept is that we can no longer expand, let alone maintain, current consumption patterns as oil production gradually declines year after year in the face of rising world demand due to ever increasing population.  

Some changes have to be made or they will be forced by the Peak Oil situation.

Ignoring Peak Oil or refusing to appreciate it&#039;s implications are not options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->While Peak Oil is here, there is no need to try to completely eliminate the use of oil.  There will always be some oil available albeit at a very high price.</p>
<p>The important concept is that we can no longer expand, let alone maintain, current consumption patterns as oil production gradually declines year after year in the face of rising world demand due to ever increasing population.  </p>
<p>Some changes have to be made or they will be forced by the Peak Oil situation.</p>
<p>Ignoring Peak Oil or refusing to appreciate it&#8217;s implications are not options.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 50merc</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-609512</link>
		<dc:creator>50merc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-609512</guid>
		<description>WildBill said &quot;The moon-battery on this issue is legion!&quot;

My gosh, you&#039;ve accidentally revealed the solution: turn the moon into a gigantic storage battery! Just haul the needed lead and acid to the moon, inject it into the core, and use radio waves to beam the resulting electrical energy back to Earth. (Use a secure frequency to prevent other nations from stealing electricity, unless it turns out to be &quot;too cheap to meter.&quot;)

For those who want to get real about alternative energy sources, Stephen Den Beste&#039;s old posts are good, concise analyses. But even he couldn&#039;t get the truly devout to put aside the religion:

http://chizumatic.mee.nu/ghosts_of_my_past</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->WildBill said &#8220;The moon-battery on this issue is legion!&#8221;</p>
<p>My gosh, you&#8217;ve accidentally revealed the solution: turn the moon into a gigantic storage battery! Just haul the needed lead and acid to the moon, inject it into the core, and use radio waves to beam the resulting electrical energy back to Earth. (Use a secure frequency to prevent other nations from stealing electricity, unless it turns out to be &#8220;too cheap to meter.&#8221;)</p>
<p>For those who want to get real about alternative energy sources, Stephen Den Beste&#8217;s old posts are good, concise analyses. But even he couldn&#8217;t get the truly devout to put aside the religion:</p>
<p><a href="http://chizumatic.mee.nu/ghosts_of_my_past" rel="nofollow">http://chizumatic.mee.nu/ghosts_of_my_past</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-609441</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-609441</guid>
		<description>Sure jpc, as soon as you get the rock in orbit the protesters will say you&#039;re raping its ecosystem, and Congress would enact a mining moratorium -- and they&#039;ll all be funded by the Platinum mine-owners lobby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Sure jpc, as soon as you get the rock in orbit the protesters will say you&#8217;re raping its ecosystem, and Congress would enact a mining moratorium &#8212; and they&#8217;ll all be funded by the Platinum mine-owners lobby.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook User</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-609421</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-609421</guid>
		<description>I saw an interview with Gore on the news last night regarding his vision.  He agreed that it was a lot of money, but it was a worthwhile sacrifice for other people to make.  Okay I added in that last part about other people, but that&#039;s what it boils down to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I saw an interview with Gore on the news last night regarding his vision.  He agreed that it was a lot of money, but it was a worthwhile sacrifice for other people to make.  Okay I added in that last part about other people, but that&#8217;s what it boils down to.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guzzi</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-609401</link>
		<dc:creator>Guzzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-609401</guid>
		<description>The solution is obvious: find a platinum-rich asteroid, park it in geostationary orbit over the U.S., run a space elevator from it to the manufacturing facilities on the ground, et voila! Plenty o&#039; Platinum! It&#039;s at least as plausibile as Gore&#039;s plan and it should only take a few centuries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The solution is obvious: find a platinum-rich asteroid, park it in geostationary orbit over the U.S., run a space elevator from it to the manufacturing facilities on the ground, et voila! Plenty o&#8217; Platinum! It&#8217;s at least as plausibile as Gore&#8217;s plan and it should only take a few centuries.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill h.</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-609301</link>
		<dc:creator>bill h.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-609301</guid>
		<description>&quot;Unless you don’t think that freeing 25-30 Million souls from the clutches of a murdering madman and his insane sons, smack in the middle of the ME oil fields is useless… I certainly don’t.&quot;

One supposes not nearly as useless as the previous reasons, like 9/11, followed by WMDs, ad nauseum.

Of course &quot;smack in the middle of the ME oil fields&quot; IS the crux of the matter, since we wouldn&#039;t be be there otherwise (e.g. see Zimbabwe, Myanmar, Tibet etc.).  

&quot;A safe and secure Iraq… as the card ad says… PRICELESS.&quot;

I hope so too.  Let us know when it happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8220;Unless you don’t think that freeing 25-30 Million souls from the clutches of a murdering madman and his insane sons, smack in the middle of the ME oil fields is useless… I certainly don’t.&#8221;</p>
<p>One supposes not nearly as useless as the previous reasons, like 9/11, followed by WMDs, ad nauseum.</p>
<p>Of course &#8220;smack in the middle of the ME oil fields&#8221; IS the crux of the matter, since we wouldn&#8217;t be be there otherwise (e.g. see Zimbabwe, Myanmar, Tibet etc.).  </p>
<p>&#8220;A safe and secure Iraq… as the card ad says… PRICELESS.&#8221;</p>
<p>I hope so too.  Let us know when it happens.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WildBill</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-609182</link>
		<dc:creator>WildBill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-609182</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I would also like to see the math on how much land we would need to use solar and wind to generate the amount of energy we use during the day that is above the rate we use at night (at present tech or likely near future tech, not Al’s dream tech).&lt;/em&gt;

I saw an engineer&#039;s assessment of this very situation a few years ago, have been trying to find it again with no luck. He basically said that there was no practical way that solar and wind would ever be more than a fraction of our energy use, ever. There&#039;s not enough land here to make it work, the technology is not advanced enough and may never be. And, as we saw in Mass. the enviros in the guise of prominent families and legislators (coughKennedycough) and other assorted tree huggers, save the whalers and NIMBYs will tie it all up in court so bad that there will be no incentive to get a fraction of the small fraction that is possible up and connected to the grid.  Oil, Coal and Nuclear is the only way to get what we need in the abundance that we need.

&lt;em&gt;The waste issue for nuclear is yet to be resolved, so relying only on that wouldn’t work even if the political consensus was there.&lt;/em&gt;

Only in the mind of above mentined enviro knuckle-heads. Safe and secure storage has been resolved, but nothing is good enough for said knuckle-heads.

The moon-battery on this issue is legion! No wonder we are still wondering in desert of this problem!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>I would also like to see the math on how much land we would need to use solar and wind to generate the amount of energy we use during the day that is above the rate we use at night (at present tech or likely near future tech, not Al’s dream tech).</em></p>
<p>I saw an engineer&#8217;s assessment of this very situation a few years ago, have been trying to find it again with no luck. He basically said that there was no practical way that solar and wind would ever be more than a fraction of our energy use, ever. There&#8217;s not enough land here to make it work, the technology is not advanced enough and may never be. And, as we saw in Mass. the enviros in the guise of prominent families and legislators (coughKennedycough) and other assorted tree huggers, save the whalers and NIMBYs will tie it all up in court so bad that there will be no incentive to get a fraction of the small fraction that is possible up and connected to the grid.  Oil, Coal and Nuclear is the only way to get what we need in the abundance that we need.</p>
<p><em>The waste issue for nuclear is yet to be resolved, so relying only on that wouldn’t work even if the political consensus was there.</em></p>
<p>Only in the mind of above mentined enviro knuckle-heads. Safe and secure storage has been resolved, but nothing is good enough for said knuckle-heads.</p>
<p>The moon-battery on this issue is legion! No wonder we are still wondering in desert of this problem!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-609151</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-609151</guid>
		<description>&quot;$200b to switch to hydrogen-powered vehicles isn’t that much&quot;

No it isn&#039;t. Problem is that it is short a few zeros. At $20,000 a copy, it would only buy about 10 million new cars. Even in this stinky year the OEMs will sell 15 million units.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8220;$200b to switch to hydrogen-powered vehicles isn’t that much&#8221;</p>
<p>No it isn&#8217;t. Problem is that it is short a few zeros. At $20,000 a copy, it would only buy about 10 million new cars. Even in this stinky year the OEMs will sell 15 million units.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WildBill</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-609111</link>
		<dc:creator>WildBill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-609111</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The US spends a lot of money on useless stuff (such as Iraq),&lt;/em&gt; 

Unless you don&#039;t think that freeing 25-30 Million souls from the clutches of a murdering madman and his insane sons, smack in the middle of the ME oil fields is useless... I certainly don&#039;t. All you lefty bastards will thank the day we spent that money there now than having to do it later to secure the entire ME. And you know and I know that we will not be entirely weaned off of oil within our lifetimes, NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. A safe and secure Iraq... as the card ad says... PRICELESS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>The US spends a lot of money on useless stuff (such as Iraq),</em> </p>
<p>Unless you don&#8217;t think that freeing 25-30 Million souls from the clutches of a murdering madman and his insane sons, smack in the middle of the ME oil fields is useless&#8230; I certainly don&#8217;t. All you lefty bastards will thank the day we spent that money there now than having to do it later to secure the entire ME. And you know and I know that we will not be entirely weaned off of oil within our lifetimes, NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. A safe and secure Iraq&#8230; as the card ad says&#8230; PRICELESS.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill h.</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-609011</link>
		<dc:creator>bill h.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-609011</guid>
		<description>trk2:
&quot;Fair enough, but I challenge you to build, approve and have even one nuclear plant online within the next ten years:) And if you do have the nuclear power plants constructed, why do you need solar or wind?&quot;

Maybe because no one solution is going to solve the problem?  Including using all the ideological hot air that&#039;s being generated in this thread:-)

The waste issue for nuclear is yet to be resolved, so relying only on that wouldn&#039;t work even if the political consensus was there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->trk2:<br />
&#8220;Fair enough, but I challenge you to build, approve and have even one nuclear plant online within the next ten years:) And if you do have the nuclear power plants constructed, why do you need solar or wind?&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe because no one solution is going to solve the problem?  Including using all the ideological hot air that&#8217;s being generated in this thread:-)</p>
<p>The waste issue for nuclear is yet to be resolved, so relying only on that wouldn&#8217;t work even if the political consensus was there.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landcrusher</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-608982</link>
		<dc:creator>Landcrusher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-608982</guid>
		<description>Andy D.,

Here is the rub with ole T. Boone&#039;s plan, and Al&#039;s.

Solar is manufactured using lot&#039;s of energy. Wind turbines are manufactured using lots of energy, out of petroleum byproducts and usually transported halfway across the planet to be inistalled. Nuclear similarly takes lots of petro to be built.

All of these are currently less efficient in the medium to long run than petro and coal.

If you want to use them, you REALLY need to drill more.  Then figure out a way to incentivise them like pollution tax schemes. That way you keep energy cost at current levels for petro while providing increased demand to make the future energy sources and while providing the incentive to use those sources.

I haven&#039;t heard any well thought out solution that doesn&#039;t take these facts into account.

I would also like to see the math on how much land we would need to use solar and wind to generate the amount of energy we use during the day that is above the rate we use at night (at present tech or likely near future tech, not Al&#039;s dream tech).

Lastly, couldn&#039;t you use solar most of the night if you put a mirror out in space?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Andy D.,</p>
<p>Here is the rub with ole T. Boone&#8217;s plan, and Al&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Solar is manufactured using lot&#8217;s of energy. Wind turbines are manufactured using lots of energy, out of petroleum byproducts and usually transported halfway across the planet to be inistalled. Nuclear similarly takes lots of petro to be built.</p>
<p>All of these are currently less efficient in the medium to long run than petro and coal.</p>
<p>If you want to use them, you REALLY need to drill more.  Then figure out a way to incentivise them like pollution tax schemes. That way you keep energy cost at current levels for petro while providing increased demand to make the future energy sources and while providing the incentive to use those sources.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t heard any well thought out solution that doesn&#8217;t take these facts into account.</p>
<p>I would also like to see the math on how much land we would need to use solar and wind to generate the amount of energy we use during the day that is above the rate we use at night (at present tech or likely near future tech, not Al&#8217;s dream tech).</p>
<p>Lastly, couldn&#8217;t you use solar most of the night if you put a mirror out in space?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebigmass</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-608962</link>
		<dc:creator>thebigmass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-608962</guid>
		<description>John Horner:

&quot;The US has been worshiping at the Market God since Reagan, and by and large it has given us a horrible hangover. Imagine if we had staid on a mission to replace foreign oil like Carter started when the US imported less than a quarter of it’s oil needs. Now, the import number is up at around 70% of US demand.&quot;

Really?  It&#039;s given us a hangover?  It seems that the horrible &#039;Market God&#039; is starting to work, as our demand for oil has slackened given the insanely high price.  Further, it has curtailed the sales of SUVs and trucks, so it seems to be doing its job (a job which years of CAFE regulations failed to do).  So we now import 70 percent of our oil.  Let&#039;s think, how can we change this?  Oh yes, either reduce our demand or increase our domestic supply.  The evil market is taking care of the first part, and wants to take care of the second part; unfortunately, the &#039;Government God&#039; won&#039;t let it drill!  Boy, that evil market, what an entity!  Al Gore wants renewable energy, and I&#039;d love to see it too.  I&#039;m convinced that we will...when it&#039;s economically viable!  As a great first step, market forces (oh, there they are again!  Tricky buggers...) have driven hybrid demand through the roof.  Curse you, Market God!

And I love-LOVE the implications of your juxtaposition of Reagan and Carter.  Boy, things sure were great under the Carter administration.  Let&#039;s abandon all of these silly conveniences...all we really need is a closet full of sweaters and a garage fully of bicycles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->John Horner:</p>
<p>&#8220;The US has been worshiping at the Market God since Reagan, and by and large it has given us a horrible hangover. Imagine if we had staid on a mission to replace foreign oil like Carter started when the US imported less than a quarter of it’s oil needs. Now, the import number is up at around 70% of US demand.&#8221;</p>
<p>Really?  It&#8217;s given us a hangover?  It seems that the horrible &#8216;Market God&#8217; is starting to work, as our demand for oil has slackened given the insanely high price.  Further, it has curtailed the sales of SUVs and trucks, so it seems to be doing its job (a job which years of CAFE regulations failed to do).  So we now import 70 percent of our oil.  Let&#8217;s think, how can we change this?  Oh yes, either reduce our demand or increase our domestic supply.  The evil market is taking care of the first part, and wants to take care of the second part; unfortunately, the &#8216;Government God&#8217; won&#8217;t let it drill!  Boy, that evil market, what an entity!  Al Gore wants renewable energy, and I&#8217;d love to see it too.  I&#8217;m convinced that we will&#8230;when it&#8217;s economically viable!  As a great first step, market forces (oh, there they are again!  Tricky buggers&#8230;) have driven hybrid demand through the roof.  Curse you, Market God!</p>
<p>And I love-LOVE the implications of your juxtaposition of Reagan and Carter.  Boy, things sure were great under the Carter administration.  Let&#8217;s abandon all of these silly conveniences&#8230;all we really need is a closet full of sweaters and a garage fully of bicycles.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuckD</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-608952</link>
		<dc:creator>BuckD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-608952</guid>
		<description>@GS650G:

&lt;i&gt;Government fiat is supposed to replace market forces.

And to think he was almost president. Thank God for hanging chads.&lt;/i&gt;

Thank God for Supreme Court fiat. Imagine if Gore were president, we might&#039;ve had to endure competent leadership.

So we know about the potential costs of the &quot;green challenge.&quot; Beyond the almost quaint concern of how getting off the dino juice will affect one&#039;s &quot;wallet&quot; (apparently some haven&#039;t noticed how gas prices are currently affecting their wallet) What are the costs of not doing anything? How does that affect one&#039;s wallet in the long-term? For the myopic and ideologically blinkered, that question probably doesn&#039;t mean a whole lot, but for anyone with a shred of insight and objectivity, it&#039;s a question we should be (and thankfully, are) seriously discussing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@GS650G:</p>
<p><i>Government fiat is supposed to replace market forces.</p>
<p>And to think he was almost president. Thank God for hanging chads.</i></p>
<p>Thank God for Supreme Court fiat. Imagine if Gore were president, we might&#8217;ve had to endure competent leadership.</p>
<p>So we know about the potential costs of the &#8220;green challenge.&#8221; Beyond the almost quaint concern of how getting off the dino juice will affect one&#8217;s &#8220;wallet&#8221; (apparently some haven&#8217;t noticed how gas prices are currently affecting their wallet) What are the costs of not doing anything? How does that affect one&#8217;s wallet in the long-term? For the myopic and ideologically blinkered, that question probably doesn&#8217;t mean a whole lot, but for anyone with a shred of insight and objectivity, it&#8217;s a question we should be (and thankfully, are) seriously discussing.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silvermink</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-608891</link>
		<dc:creator>Silvermink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-608891</guid>
		<description>I, for one, welcome our new platinum-baron overlords.

Whatever else you can say about Al Gore, he&#039;s definitely succeeded in getting climate change front-and-center, for better or for worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I, for one, welcome our new platinum-baron overlords.</p>
<p>Whatever else you can say about Al Gore, he&#8217;s definitely succeeded in getting climate change front-and-center, for better or for worse.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkross22</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-608831</link>
		<dc:creator>jkross22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-608831</guid>
		<description>Al Gore is as much of an embarrassment as George W Bush has proven to be.  The difference is that many of us have been convinced Gore is right.  

Problem is, Al Gore is a hypocrite.  When he says reduce consumption, he means for everyone but him.  This guy has a serious credibility problem.

Kind of like Obama saying he wants thermostats set at 78 degrees, but I&#039;m sure his will stay at a nice comfy 72 during those hot Chicago Summers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Al Gore is as much of an embarrassment as George W Bush has proven to be.  The difference is that many of us have been convinced Gore is right.  </p>
<p>Problem is, Al Gore is a hypocrite.  When he says reduce consumption, he means for everyone but him.  This guy has a serious credibility problem.</p>
<p>Kind of like Obama saying he wants thermostats set at 78 degrees, but I&#8217;m sure his will stay at a nice comfy 72 during those hot Chicago Summers.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-608821</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-608821</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;10 years with the right people in place is not unobtainable. We managed to develop a solution and actually put men on the moon in 10 years&lt;/i&gt;

Wrong, it would be wholly and completely IMPOSSIBLE to accomplish what Gore wants in 10 years. It cannot be done. You cannot rebuild the entire US electrical infrastructure, serving 330 million people (pop. in 10 years) across a whole continent -- using only solar and wind, since Gore refuses nukes and hydro is tapped out -- in 10 years, that&#039;s totally absurd. 

This little project is many orders of magnitude greater than sending rockets to the moon or cranking out liberty ships and fighter aircraft in WWII. There is not enough time, money, capital, or human resources to even think about that time frame.

You could not even TRAIN enough people to BEGIN the necessary infrastructure building in 10 years, even assuming suppliers could give you enough wind turbines and solar equipment -- which they absolutely could not do under any circumstance.

Moreover, even if you accomplished a miracle by doing this in, say, THIRTY years, it&#039;s insufficient because you need other generation sources to augment wind and solar when the sun and wind are not cooperating.

BTW -- I say this as someone who&#039;s got a skunkworks project of my own to get into wind power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><i>10 years with the right people in place is not unobtainable. We managed to develop a solution and actually put men on the moon in 10 years</i></p>
<p>Wrong, it would be wholly and completely IMPOSSIBLE to accomplish what Gore wants in 10 years. It cannot be done. You cannot rebuild the entire US electrical infrastructure, serving 330 million people (pop. in 10 years) across a whole continent &#8212; using only solar and wind, since Gore refuses nukes and hydro is tapped out &#8212; in 10 years, that&#8217;s totally absurd. </p>
<p>This little project is many orders of magnitude greater than sending rockets to the moon or cranking out liberty ships and fighter aircraft in WWII. There is not enough time, money, capital, or human resources to even think about that time frame.</p>
<p>You could not even TRAIN enough people to BEGIN the necessary infrastructure building in 10 years, even assuming suppliers could give you enough wind turbines and solar equipment &#8212; which they absolutely could not do under any circumstance.</p>
<p>Moreover, even if you accomplished a miracle by doing this in, say, THIRTY years, it&#8217;s insufficient because you need other generation sources to augment wind and solar when the sun and wind are not cooperating.</p>
<p>BTW &#8212; I say this as someone who&#8217;s got a skunkworks project of my own to get into wind power.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy D</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-608812</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-608812</guid>
		<description>D. Holzman, In those days, the US had  the industrial infra structure  necessary to produce and ship the materiel. Not any more.  Incrementally, starting today is the way to go. It flies in the face of quarterly statements, and instant gratification. But  a coherent, long range plan, using available technology will do it. Graduallism, should  allow affected industries to shift priorties to embrace the goal.  Texas is building wind fields and  the transmission lines to centers where the power is needed.  T. Boone Pickens has  an ad on tv about  some  energy scheme. It has started already. What is needed is the political resolve to see it  through, not let it die as it did in the 70s. 
As for  the greenies, they should be hammered by the &quot;silent majority&quot; until they realize that  their altruism  is misguided and hypercritical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->D. Holzman, In those days, the US had  the industrial infra structure  necessary to produce and ship the materiel. Not any more.  Incrementally, starting today is the way to go. It flies in the face of quarterly statements, and instant gratification. But  a coherent, long range plan, using available technology will do it. Graduallism, should  allow affected industries to shift priorties to embrace the goal.  Texas is building wind fields and  the transmission lines to centers where the power is needed.  T. Boone Pickens has  an ad on tv about  some  energy scheme. It has started already. What is needed is the political resolve to see it  through, not let it die as it did in the 70s.<br />
As for  the greenies, they should be hammered by the &#8220;silent majority&#8221; until they realize that  their altruism  is misguided and hypercritical.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guyincognito</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-608761</link>
		<dc:creator>guyincognito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-608761</guid>
		<description>I think it is very noble that Al would be willing to do all that work for a salary of only $3.2 trillion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I think it is very noble that Al would be willing to do all that work for a salary of only $3.2 trillion.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trk2</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-608531</link>
		<dc:creator>trk2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-608531</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;But any kind of distributed, non-renewable power generation requires a well thought out backup system, which could include nuclear or thermal storage to my mind.&lt;/em&gt;

Fair enough, but I challenge you to build, approve and have even one nuclear plant online within the next ten years:)  And if you do have the nuclear power plants constructed, why do you need solar or wind?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>But any kind of distributed, non-renewable power generation requires a well thought out backup system, which could include nuclear or thermal storage to my mind.</em></p>
<p>Fair enough, but I challenge you to build, approve and have even one nuclear plant online within the next ten years:)  And if you do have the nuclear power plants constructed, why do you need solar or wind?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill h.</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-608472</link>
		<dc:creator>bill h.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-608472</guid>
		<description>trk2:  I agree with you to an extent--however, one presumes that our grid infrastructure would have to be modernized as well (it&#039;s not in great shape as is), which could address some of your issues.  But any kind of distributed, non-renewable power generation requires a well thought out backup system, which could include nuclear or thermal storage to my mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->trk2:  I agree with you to an extent&#8211;however, one presumes that our grid infrastructure would have to be modernized as well (it&#8217;s not in great shape as is), which could address some of your issues.  But any kind of distributed, non-renewable power generation requires a well thought out backup system, which could include nuclear or thermal storage to my mind.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trk2</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-608442</link>
		<dc:creator>trk2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-608442</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, but this is just a ridiculous idea.  Any energy infrastructure based on solar or wind will need contemporary sources to back it up because we have things like night, rain and non-windy days.  Conventional coal, gas or oil plants just can&#039;t be switched on when sun goes down or the wind drops.  It can take days to bring a boiler up to temperature which means the plants must still be operating in a standby capacity; using fossil fuels to keep the boilers hot but generating little to no power.  Furthermore, as the need for electricity demand increases, you must have excess capacity from non-weather dependent sources.  This means conventional plants must continue to be produced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;m sorry, but this is just a ridiculous idea.  Any energy infrastructure based on solar or wind will need contemporary sources to back it up because we have things like night, rain and non-windy days.  Conventional coal, gas or oil plants just can&#8217;t be switched on when sun goes down or the wind drops.  It can take days to bring a boiler up to temperature which means the plants must still be operating in a standby capacity; using fossil fuels to keep the boilers hot but generating little to no power.  Furthermore, as the need for electricity demand increases, you must have excess capacity from non-weather dependent sources.  This means conventional plants must continue to be produced.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Holzman</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-608411</link>
		<dc:creator>David Holzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-608411</guid>
		<description>Life is not necessarily incremental. During WWII we managed to crank out 300,000 planes and 1.5 million tanks, at a time when the US was much smaller and poorer than it is today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Life is not necessarily incremental. During WWII we managed to crank out 300,000 planes and 1.5 million tanks, at a time when the US was much smaller and poorer than it is today.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Horner</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-608401</link>
		<dc:creator>John Horner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-608401</guid>
		<description>&quot;And to think he was almost president.&quot;

Ah, but look who we got instead!

The US has been worshiping at the Market God since Reagan, and by and large it has given us a horrible hangover.  Imagine if we had staid on a mission to replace foreign oil like Carter started when the US imported less than a quarter of it&#039;s oil needs.  Now, the import number is up at around 70% of US demand.

Remember all that talk about persistence and long term views visa-vis the GM/Toyota battle?  It isn&#039;t just US executives who have a head-in-the-sand get-me-through-the-month outlook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8220;And to think he was almost president.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, but look who we got instead!</p>
<p>The US has been worshiping at the Market God since Reagan, and by and large it has given us a horrible hangover.  Imagine if we had staid on a mission to replace foreign oil like Carter started when the US imported less than a quarter of it&#8217;s oil needs.  Now, the import number is up at around 70% of US demand.</p>
<p>Remember all that talk about persistence and long term views visa-vis the GM/Toyota battle?  It isn&#8217;t just US executives who have a head-in-the-sand get-me-through-the-month outlook.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landcrusher</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/3200000000-for-an-oil-free-future/comment-page-1/#comment-608322</link>
		<dc:creator>Landcrusher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=57142#comment-608322</guid>
		<description>For all you hydrogen guys, the source is rather key. The oil companies couldn&#039;t care less about a switch to hydrogen if it&#039;s produced by using oil and natural gas (which is presently the only way we could meet the demand for transport).

Bunkie has a pretty good handle on it. The platinum question is a valid one. Also, the prize system works well, it&#039;s been proven several times. The tax thing will likey end up being a great outlet for legislative graft, but it may work anyway. There will just be a significant loss of funds to the friends and families of those in power. Nothing new there.

I also think we need to drill, drill, drill, and research, research, research, and not forget about either one when oil drops back to $100 a barrel. I won&#039;t hold my breath or even cross my fingers though.

Lastly, we can probably save the world if we can get guys like Ash78 to settle for a single little speaker. After all, it&#039;s anybody really &quot;needs&quot;. (just kidding Ash, and yes, I am going to flog this equine long after it dies because no one seems to learn).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->For all you hydrogen guys, the source is rather key. The oil companies couldn&#8217;t care less about a switch to hydrogen if it&#8217;s produced by using oil and natural gas (which is presently the only way we could meet the demand for transport).</p>
<p>Bunkie has a pretty good handle on it. The platinum question is a valid one. Also, the prize system works well, it&#8217;s been proven several times. The tax thing will likey end up being a great outlet for legislative graft, but it may work anyway. There will just be a significant loss of funds to the friends and families of those in power. Nothing new there.</p>
<p>I also think we need to drill, drill, drill, and research, research, research, and not forget about either one when oil drops back to $100 a barrel. I won&#8217;t hold my breath or even cross my fingers though.</p>
<p>Lastly, we can probably save the world if we can get guys like Ash78 to settle for a single little speaker. After all, it&#8217;s anybody really &#8220;needs&#8221;. (just kidding Ash, and yes, I am going to flog this equine long after it dies because no one seems to learn).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 54/147 queries in 0.191 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 04:04:15 -->