U.S. to Hit Chinese-built Vehicles With 25 Percent Tariff; China Fires Back

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Just in time for the weekend, an escalation in the ongoing trade wars has seen the Trump administration announce a 25 percent tariff on $50 billion worth of goods imported from China. These tariffs include automobiles. For its part, China retaliated by applying a further 25 percent tariff on a similar amount of American goods, including automobiles.

The move comes less than a month after China announced a plan that would lower import duties and eventually allow foreign automakers to set up shop without a joint Chinese partner. Of course, that was then, and this is now.

Both sets of duties will come into effect on July 6th, with the Office of the United States’ Trade Representative publishing a long list of products impacted by the new tariffs. Initially, the 25 percent tariff will only apply to $34 billion worth of goods, most of them industrial in nature. The remaining $16 billion, which appeared on a list released in April (later revised), will become the subject of consultations, including public hearings.

Bloomberg reports that the price of a Buick Envision, a model solely sourced from China, would rise $8,000 after July 6th. Last year, just over 58,000 vehicles entered the U.S. from that country.

China’s sticking to the same schedule as Trump on this, as well as to the dollar amounts. After jacking levies on $34 billion in U.S. goods (the list includes agricultural products and seafood, in addition to automobiles), the country will hold off on the remaining $16 billion until a later date. No doubt, it’s waiting to see what the White House decides.

Under China’s previous plan, issued in response to Trump’s threat to do exactly this, China would have lowered the import duty on U.S. automobiles from 25 to 15 percent on July 1st while cutting its tariff on imported auto parts to a flat 6 percent. The U.S. already levies an import fee of 2.5 percent on all overseas automobiles, with the exception of light trucks. Since the Johnson administration, the “chicken tax” (a 25 percent tariff) has kept cool compact trucks away from our shores.

According to the New York Times, a senior administration official said companies would be able to apply for exemptions from the tariffs, assuming they cannot source products or materials from anywhere else.

Critics of Trump’s plan include the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Retail Association, though certain lawmakers, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Senator Marco Rubio, said the action against China was A-OK. What worries many observers, especially those in the auto industry, is that the Chinese tariffs are a prelude to a 25 percent import fee on all inbound vehicles — including those from Japan, Europe, and Canada.

[Image: GM China]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 169 comments
  • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Jun 17, 2018

    This is going to put a kink in Ford's no cars for old men plan (I argue Ford as a backup plan would import small cars from China and Europe if need be. Now it looks like they won't be able too).

  • PandaBear PandaBear on Jun 18, 2018

    Be careful what you wish for. You think you will get more jobs in the US with trade war, but you may end up with fewer. Full blown trade war may accelerate automation, and all of the jobs will be gone from both sides.

  • Ltcmgm78 Just what we need to do: add more EVs that require a charging station! We own a Volt. We charge at home. We bought the Volt off-lease. We're retired and can do all our daily errands without burning any gasoline. For us this works, but we no longer have a work commute.
  • Michael S6 Given the choice between the Hornet R/T and the Alfa, I'd pick an Uber.
  • Michael S6 Nissan seems to be doing well at the low end of the market with their small cars and cuv. Competitiveness evaporates as you move up to larger size cars and suvs.
  • Cprescott As long as they infest their products with CVT's, there is no reason to buy their products. Nissan's execution of CVT's is lackluster on a good day - not dependable and bad in experience of use. The brand has become like Mitsubishi - will sell to anyone with a pulse to get financed.
  • Lorenzo I'd like to believe, I want to believe, having had good FoMoCo vehicles - my aunt's old 1956 Fairlane, 1963 Falcon, 1968 Montego - but if Jim Farley is saying it, I can't believe it. It's been said that he goes with whatever the last person he talked to suggested. That's not the kind of guy you want running a $180 billion dollar company.
Next