Night Moves: Ford Unveils 2020 Explorer Under Cover of Darkness

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

As you learned here, the 2020 Ford Explorer adopts the rear-drive platform found beneath the upcoming Lincoln Aviator, as well as the luxury division’s top-flight engine. A twin-turbo 3.0-liter V6 of unspecified power will appear under its hood and mate to a 10-speed automatic, a source tells us, while the 3.3-liter V6 found in the F-150 replaces the current 3.5-liter unit. The 2.3-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder carries on unchanged for thrifty buyers.

Oh, and there’ll be a hybrid version, too. Ford’s only willing to talk about the electrified Explorer at this point, and on Tuesday it made the unusual choice of debuting the 2020 Explorer in fuel-sipping felon catcher guise.

Enter the Police Interceptor Utility hybrid.

As you can see here (or can’t, as the case would be), the creases and curves of the 2020 Explorer aren’t exactly bathed in bright sunlight. Ford’s going the striptease route for this reveal. Naturally, we lightened the provided photos for your benefit, though the difference isn’t exactly, ahem, night and day.

Regardless, the new Explorer’s shortened front overhang and trimmer, more angular proportions aren’t entirely hidden from view. Like with the Aviator, Ford’s CD6 platform allows for a more upscale, almost Range Rover-esque profile.

And what of Ford’s first front-line cop SUV hybrid? Plenty of expectations, but few specifics. The automaker won’t even describe the engine, nor the output or battery capacity. Instead, the Blue Oval boys want to discuss the police department’s budget.

Having these things in a law enforcement fleet stands to save the operator $3,200 per vehicle in annual fuel costs, the automaker estimates, thanks to the model’s projected combined fuel economy of “at least” 24 mpg. That’s a 40 percent improvement from a contemporary Police Interceptor Utility equipped with a 3.7-liter V6, Ford claims.

To put that fuel economy figure into context, the thriftiest Explorer currently in Ford’s stable is the front-drive 2.3-liter civilian model, which returns 22 mpg combined. Adding all-wheel drive — standard on cop variants — drops that figure to 21 mpg.

Further fuel savings come from the hybrid’s ability to power all accessories via its lithium-ion battery when the vehicle isn’t in motion, like during a stakeout or while sitting at a speed trap. Ford made a similar claim last year when it debuted a “pursuit-rated” Fusion hybrid. Given the automaker’s decision to chop all sedans from its portfolio (the Fusion Hybrid and Energi might last the longest of them all), having a hybrid cop SUV is essential for preserving the brand’s green street cred.

Ford says the Police Interceptor Utility hybrid, when equipped with a Class III tow package, should be able to haul around up to 5,000 pounds.

That’s the entirety of what we know about this vehicle’s specs, though Ford’s making one new feature available to law enforcement buyers. The Police Perimeter Alert system places the blind-spot monitoring system on sentry duty, scanning 270 degrees of the vehicle’s perimeter to pinpoint potential threats. Motion of surrounding objects is analyzed to determine a threat level, with the activity displayed via the vehicle’s instrument cluster.

“When suspicious behavior is detected, the vehicle automatically sounds a chime, rolls up the windows and locks the doors,” Ford claims.

The 2020 Explorer, in both cop and civilian guise, rolls out next summer.

[Images: Ford Motor Company]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 36 comments
  • EBFlex EBFlex on Jun 13, 2018

    So Ford, in their infinite stupidity, decided it was a good idea to reveal their second most important product behind the Fseries, as a fleet model that people cannot buy. Further, why would they spend all that time and energy redesigning the Explorer when the end result looks exactly the same as the current one? So we will have an all new Explorer that’s as bland as a bowl of cold oatmeal. Brilliant furniture guy, brilliant. Mark Fields would have never let this level of incompetence happen.

  • Conslaw Conslaw on Dec 01, 2020

    $3,200 per year in fuel savings is not too shabby. Even if it is just half that, over 7 years is $11,200.

  • 28-Cars-Later I'm getting a Knight Rider vibe... or is it more Knightboat?
  • 28-Cars-Later "the person would likely be involved in taking the Corvette to the next level with full electrification."Chevrolet sold 37,224 C8s in 2023 starting at $65,895 in North America (no word on other regions) while Porsche sold 40,629 Taycans worldwide starting at $99,400. I imagine per unit Porsche/VAG profit at $100K+ but was far as R&D payback and other sunk costs I cannot say. I remember reading the new C8 platform was designed for hybrids (or something to that effect) so I expect Chevrolet to experiment with different model types but I don't expect Corvette to become the Taycan. If that is the expectation, I think it will ride off into the sunset because GM is that incompetent/impotent. Additional: In ten years outside of wrecks I expect a majority of C8s to still be running and economically roadworthy, I do not expect that of Taycans.
  • Tassos Jong-iL Not all martyrs see divinity, but at least you tried.
  • ChristianWimmer My girlfriend has a BMW i3S. She has no garage. Her car parks on the street in front of her apartment throughout the year. The closest charging station in her neighborhood is about 1 kilometer away. She has no EV-charging at work.When her charge is low and she’s on the way home, she will visit that closest 1 km away charger (which can charge two cars) , park her car there (if it’s not occupied) and then she has two hours time to charge her car before she is by law required to move. After hooking up her car to the charger, she has to walk that 1 km home and go back in 2 hours. It’s not practical for sure and she does find it annoying.Her daily trip to work is about 8 km. The 225 km range of her BMW i3S will last her for a week or two and that’s fine for her. I would never be able to handle this “stress”. I prefer pulling up to a gas station, spend barely 2 minutes filling up my small 53 liter fuel tank, pay for the gas and then manage almost 720 km range in my 25-35% thermal efficient internal combustion engine vehicle.
  • Tassos Jong-iL Here in North Korea we are lucky to have any tires.
Next