Midsize Ram Pickup Coming to the U.S., Replaces a Mitsubishi-based Model Overseas

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Years of on-again, off-again rumors about the addition of a baby Ram truck to Fiat Chrysler’s product line has led us to this day. While the automaker’s Capital Markets Day presentation in Italy focused primarily on Jeep and the two Italian luxury divisions — three of the four global brands highlighted in its five-year plan — Ram sees new product, too, including a midsize truck.

CEO Sergio Marchionne wants its core brands spread as far and wide as possible, and that means occupying new segments. For Ram, this means the large off-road truck niche and the growing midsize market. “We’re working on it,” is what Marchionne said two years ago after being asked about a midsize Ram.

FCA had kiboshed the idea in 2015, claiming that developing a new midsize would prove too costly. And yet here we are.

In this morning’s presentation, the only mention of the truck was its inclusion in a product chart. It’s listed as “new mid-size/metric ton,” and FCA says it will appear before the plan’s five-year window ends in 2022.

Ram brand boss Mike Manley wasn’t forthcoming with a predicted launch date during the presentation, nor would he say whether the model would resurrect the Dakota name. (The automaker’s last domestic midsize truck disappeared from the market after 2011.) Initially, what with so much talk of global markets and so little mention of the new model, there was some confusion as to whether the U.S. would see the truck at all.

When contacted by TTAC, David Elshoff, head of Ram brand communications, confirmed that Marchionne intends to bring the midsize truck to America. According to Elshoff, Ram brand boss Mike Manley claims the new model will replace the body-on-frame Fiat Fullback in overseas markets. The Fullback, based on the Mitsubishi Triton/L200, apparently produced “inconsequential” sales.

The replacement of the Fullback by the unnamed Ram (it’ll carry a different badge in other markets) jibes with what Stephanie Brinley of IHS Automotive reported via Twitter. The new truck “is expected to be more important for global sales than for US sales,” she said.

Certainly, the North American and overseas markets are polar opposites when it comes to truck size preference (and availability). Given the upcoming addition of the Ford Ranger in the domestic market and the continued success of the Toyota Tacoma and General Motors twins, a new Ram makes sense, but it only makes financial sense as a global product.

Paul Eisenstein of The Detroit Bureau tweeted that the model will appear “probably ’21-ish,” according to comments made by Marchionne.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 45 comments
  • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Jun 01, 2018

    One thing that would of forced FCA to move away from Mitsubishi. The sale of Mitsubishi to Nissan. Will Mitsubishi move to the D23 platform and drop the Triton in the near future? The current Navara is used by Reno, Nissan and Mercedes Benz.

    • Oberkanone Oberkanone on Jun 03, 2018

      Mitsubishi is developing replacement truck for Triton that is lower cost and slightly smaller than Navara. Triton and Navara will be sold by either or both Mitsubishi and Nissan depending on market.

  • Oberkanone Oberkanone on Jun 03, 2018

    Not in agreement with a me too midsize for U.S.A. and Canada. A compact truck is needed. Why not import the STRADA? Compact light utility with lower price and downsized expectations of capability. Please don't import or base the new midsize on the Toro.

  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
  • BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
Next