Lagonda Vs Rolls-Royce Battle Continues, Now With Fewer Petty Insults

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Egg spoons fell to the tabletop and kippers went uneaten as noblemen across the land gazed in slack-jawed silence at the new Cullinan SUV high-bodied car unveiled by Rolls-Royce this morning.

It’s a vehicle so excessive in its dimensions and interior trappings, even long-deceased kings might find it gauche. Or, perhaps, just the right thing with which to ferry their corpulence from one sherry-stained dinner function to another. Polarizing, to say the least. One internet wag remarked that the Cullinan resembled a hearse with a backseat.

Regardless of how you feel about it, no one’s going to deny that Rolls-Royce now stands regally atop the luxury SUV hill, gazing down upon its lesser rivals with contempt. Clearly, the thought of the century-old British automaker pulling this off must have ground Lagonda’s gears, as the recently revived British luxury marque sought to get out in front of the introduction with an announcement of its own.

It seems the rivalry didn’t end after a testy spat earlier this year.

You’ll recall the war of words between RR and Aston Martin’s Lagonda brand. The returning marque claimed RR was a dusty old fogey with no new ideas, while RR countered by saying Aston Martin had “no clue” what ultra-luxury buyers like, and no clue how to attract them.

It was posh and scrappy all at the same time.

The two marques offer vastly different interpretations of what a luxury vehicle can be. With an upcoming production vehicle inspired by its Blade Runner-esque Lagonda Vision Concept (revealed earlier this year in Geneva), Lagonda hopes to attract a new type of super-premium buyer. The type attracted to radical, cutting-edge design. The type that isn’t afraid of kicking tradition to the curb and embracing new technologies.

Rolls-Royce, on the other hand, is all about dignified wood trim and suicide doors and positively Edwardian plushness. Beneath the long hoods of its cars beat multi-cylindered hearts powered by “gasoline.”

So, it wasn’t a surprise to see Lagonda issue a press release on May 9th, a day before the Cullinan’s reveal, touting great things to come in the insanely premium utility vehicle field. A “radical, sector-defining zero-emission SUV” will debut in 2021, the automaker claimed, one “exclusively driven by zero emission powertrain technologies.”

The new vehicle “will uphold all the qualities of the reinvented super-luxury marque,” it continued, promising an updated take on the design language seen on the Vision Concept. The image released Thursday shows a vehicle with the same overall shape, but even less side glass than the concept. Essentially, it’s a concept based on a concept.

“In reviving one of the most iconic names in motoring we have created a unique opportunity,” said Aston Martin CEO Andy Palmer in a statement. “One that allows us to cast aside an inherited 20th century approach and instead design cars around 21st century demands and desires. The Lagonda SUV is the first of its kind: a spacious, high-performance 4×4 that successfully reconciles a love of technology, luxury and style.”

Apparently, modern luxury buyers won’t feel the need to peer out the side of their cars. While the design will surely change come production, it’s incredibly amusing to see these two old Brits going at it. To the best of our knowledge, RR hasn’t responded to Lagonda’s attempt at one-upping its debut. Really, it doesn’t need to. The Cullinan itself is all the ammo RR needs to fight its resurrected rival.

[Image: Aston Martin]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 8 comments
  • Hydromatic Hydromatic on May 11, 2018

    I have to wonder if Aston Martin will ever launch a "Lagonda" sub-brand with SUVs and fastbacked sedans galore.

  • Tstag Tstag on May 12, 2018

    Why not show the recent Lagonda SUV concept car rather than this pic? It looks futuristic in a good way and is highly original. Personally I think the Cullen is horrid the Lagonda will whip its ass, I say that as a Rolls-Royce Royce fan!

  • Theflyersfan OK, I'm going to stretch the words "positive change" to the breaking point here, but there might be some positive change going on with the beaver grille here. This picture was at Car and Driver. You'll notice that the grille now dives into a larger lower air intake instead of really standing out in a sea of plastic. In darker colors like this blue, it somewhat conceals the absolute obscene amount of real estate this unneeded monstrosity of a failed styling attempt takes up. The Euro front plate might be hiding some sins as well. You be the judge.
  • Theflyersfan I know given the body style they'll sell dozens, but for those of us who grew up wanting a nice Prelude Si with 4WS but our student budgets said no way, it'd be interesting to see if Honda can persuade GenX-ers to open their wallets for one. Civic Type-R powertrain in a coupe body style? Mild hybrid if they have to? The holy grail will still be if Honda gives the ultimate middle finger towards all things EV and hybrid, hides a few engineers in the basement away from spy cameras and leaks, comes up with a limited run of 9,000 rpm engines and gives us the last gasp of the S2000 once again. A send off to remind us of when once they screamed before everything sounds like a whirring appliance.
  • Jeff Nice concept car. One can only dream.
  • Funky D The problem is not exclusively the cost of the vehicle. The problem is that there are too few use cases for BEVs that couldn't be done by a plug-in hybrid, with the latter having the ability to do long-range trips without requiring lengthy recharging and being better able to function in really cold climates.In our particular case, a plug-in hybrid would run in all electric mode for the vast majority of the miles we would drive on a regular basis. It would also charge faster and the battery replacement should be less expensive than its BEV counterpart.So the answer for me is a polite, but firm NO.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic 2012 Ford Escape V6 FWD at 147k miles:Just went thru a heavy maintenance cycle: full brake job with rotors and drums, replace top & bottom radiator hoses, radiator flush, transmission flush, replace valve cover gaskets (still leaks oil, but not as bad as before), & fan belt. Also, #4 fuel injector locked up. About $4.5k spread over 19 months. Sole means of transportation, so don't mind spending the money for reliability. Was going to replace prior to the above maintenance cycle, but COVID screwed up the market ( $4k markup over sticker including $400 for nitrogen in the tires), so bit the bullet. Now serious about replacing, but waiting for used and/or new car prices to fall a bit more. Have my eye on a particular SUV. Last I checked, had a $2.5k discount with great interest rate (better than my CU) for financing. Will keep on driving Escape as long as A/C works. 🚗🚗🚗
Next