QOTD: Drop the Body, Save the Name?
We’ve already seen this happen. A manufacturer discontinues a model, but can’t help but feel the nameplate deserved a longer life. So, it keeps it around, waiting to affix it to the exterior of a new model — even if it’s in a different segment than before. Even if it’s a different bodystyle. Yes, we remember the old Chrysler Pacifica crossover. We also remember when the Aspen was a sedan with rust-prone fenders. Hey, how ’bout that Taurus X?
Mitsubishi recently got in on the name game with its Eclipse Cross crossover. Why not grab a handful of a defunct model’s hard-earned cachet and sprinkle it over something new and altogether different? It’s an automaker’s prerogative, but our eyes couldn’t have rolled back further into our heads when we heard the news. Yes, one day we’ll all be driving crossovers (or trucks, but nothing else), but really? Eclipse?
Clearly, automakers are willing to make this controversial plunge. Which begs the question: what nameplate’s next for a utility vehicle resurrection?
By all accounts, the Ford Fusion midsize sedan is not long for this world, but that doesn’t mean its name can’t live on. Ford hasn’t officially revealed the model’s future (or lack thereof), but it wouldn’t be odd to see the Blue Oval reuse the name on a new model.
Hell, maybe we’ll one day see a two-box Chevrolet with “Impala” on it.
As the flood of crossovers seems unending, there’ll be plenty of opportunities. Many run the risk of offending. While the Mach 1 wasn’t a model in its own right, it was a very particular Ford Mustang — one many feel should not return as an electric SUV. Heritage is sometimes sacred. Still, who among us would be surprised to see the Dart nameplate return on, say, a small Dodge crossover? What about Intrepid? Avenger?
Ford’s Galaxie and Galaxie XL sounds ripe for reuse on a large (and larger, extended wheelbase) SUV. It’s a good thing Ford already has product in that space.
All right, B&B, let’s toss some names in the ring. What nameplates of the past do you feel will one day grace the exterior of a new utility vehicle? And, will it make you upset?
More by Steph Willems
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Another Hyunkia'sis?
- FreedMike "It would be on my shopping list – especially since the price tag is pretty nice at $33,700 (plus $1,150 for D and D) for the manual and $35,200 plus destination for the DCT." True, but that's BEFORE the dealer markups, which are ludicrous.
- Jeff Tim--Thanks always good to have a car review especially a car with a manual transmission.
- Analoggrotto The best in the segment, hands down bar none. ATPs translate directly to street cred and Hyundai's got them. The GR Corolla regularly blows up engines while a pentagon certified data racing engine is installed in each and every one of these Rhys Millen proud machines. Proud to be an HMC fan.
- EBFlex Tesla is garbage. Engineering is woefully inadequate. This is what happens when tech bros design vehicles and not automotive engineers. And before the usual mouth breathers come by and spew their typical nonsense, yes, I acknowledge that this has happened before. But injecting some context into this, this is yet another issue in a very long line of serious issues with the CyberPuke. If you can't design a safe accelerator pedal, you should not be in the automotive business.
Comments
Join the conversation
BMW should use Bavaria on their largest SUV instead of X8 or whatever...
*flips through his 1945-1980 VIN decoding book* GM: * Chevelle * Nomad * Nova * Riviera * Skylark Ford: * Fairlane * Galaxie FCA: * Belvedere * Hornet * Gladiator * New Yorker * Valiant * Wayfairer Seriously, how has Nomad not been repurposed yet on some GM CUV?