Talk to Me, Like Drivers Do: Ford Comes Up With a New Way to Open a Door

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The relationship between humans and cars is poised to become quite different in the years to come, or so the automakers warn promise us. Autonomous vehicles will whisk us to whatever destination we desire, simply by inputting our desired address into a navigation system or, perhaps, just by speaking it aloud. Already, the level of communication between humans and the modern car astounds.

We’ve come a long way from Chrysler’s Electronic Voice Alert, that nagging companion of the 1980s.

Now, Ford Motor Company looks ready to take our current relationship to the next level, while putting the human in charge. A U.S. patent published today describes a car that opens its doors only when it hears its master’s voice. And by “open,” we mean wide open, not just unlocked.

The patent describes a power assist device “coupled between the door and vehicle body on a hinge assembly” that’s connected to an audio sensor located on the exterior and/or interior of the vehicle. Voice command data gathered by the sensors flow to a controller, which first interprets the command, then opens (or closes) the appropriate door.

Ford’s “smart” door system would be able to apply extra muscle to the door via the power assist device if the car is parked on an incline, choosing to open it fully or stopping at any number of pre-programmed angles. Sensors would prevent the door from striking objects during the opening and closing procedures, sparing both fingers and garage-bound trash cans. The patent describes a “soft close feature” that prevents the doors from slamming with too much force, even if a occupant initiates it by hand.

Certain high-end vehicles, including the Tesla Model X, already feature doors that open by themselves when prompted by a signal, and Ford’s Lincoln Continental has portals that unlatch and open ever so slightly after sensing a hand placed inside the fixed handle. However, Ford’s system would be able to open those doors fully, and would do it after hearing your voice. This would come in handy when your arms are full of groceries.

There’s actually any number of ways the doors could receive an audio signal. Drivers could send an “open” or “close” signal via a button located on the door or within the vehicle, or by a button on the driver’s key fob. By using a “record” mode, new users could program their voice commands into the system, thus allowing the car to recognize them. Still conceptual, the wide-open patent leaves plenty of options open for the automaker. Whatever its final form, convenience will be key.

The option of manually opening one’s doors will certainly remain, but wouldn’t it be nice to be able to yell at your car and actually have it respond?

H/T to Bozi Tatarevic!

[Images: United States Patent and Trademark Office]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 31 comments
  • Sub-600 Sub-600 on Feb 14, 2018

    What if your Ford responds “I don’t care for your tone” and refuses to open the door?

  • Vulpine Vulpine on Feb 15, 2018

    I can see SO many ways that can be misused, abused and become downright deadly. It's already bad enough that people can steal your car just by relaying your key fob's signal from your bedroom to the door lock. Now someone will be able to just walk up to your car and say, "open" and drive away.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next