Tesla's New Strategy Includes 'Not Paying' Elon Musk and an Astronomical Share Price

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Tesla Motors has announced that its CEO, Elon Musk, won’t be paid unless its already high stock valuation blasts into the stratosphere. The executive’s compensation is now tied to a dozen operational milestones. The first of these requires bringing the company’s current market cap to $100 billion, followed by 11 more set at $50 billion increments.

Agreeing to the program, Musk now has to stay with Tesla until 2028 as both its executive chair and product officer. While this does allow him to bring in another CEO sometime in the future, the company is likely hoping to dispel any speculation that he would abandon the position. It’s good to see Musk putting some serious skin into the game but, as a multi-billionaire, his not being paid unless Tesla’s stock valuation climbs isn’t the biggest threat to his financial security.

He’ll also be able to fall back on minimum wage if everything falls apart, as Californian law stipulates all employees must be paid something. However, whether or not Musk decides to cash those modest checks is entirely up to him. Otherwise, his entire payment is linked to the aforementioned 10-year grant of stock options that are directly linked to Tesla’s valuation milestones. For each one met, the CEO gets another 1.69 million shares (about 1 percent of Tesla’s current total outstanding shares).

“For Elon to fully vest in the award, Tesla’s market cap must increase to $650 billion,” the automaker said.

That’s a lot of money and none of it has to do with the company’s production or profitability. Still, if Tesla didn’t bolster its current output, it’s difficult to imagine the company ever achieving those share price milestones. The company’s current valuation sits just shy of $60 billion.

Elon is already Tesla’s largest shareholder, owning 20 percent of the company, so the incentives for him to jack up its stock value are already in place. That makes this whole thing feel like publicity stunt aimed at psyching up investors, which we suppose is a sound enough strategy — especially considering this is extremely similar to how he already gets paid. Ultimately, the announcement seems like little more than a phenomenal way to make shareholders feel warm and fuzzy inside. But, no matter how you feel about Musk or his business, his commitment to the cause is genuine.

Were Tesla to achieve its proposed $650 billion valuation, it would become one of the largest corporate entities in the United States. Some financial experts are sure to scoff, however, it wasn’t all that long ago when the automaker was less than a tenth of its current size. But can Tesla continue to grow such a breakneck pace?

Musk certainly thinks so. Speaking with The New York Times, the CEO said, “I actually see the potential for Tesla to become a trillion-dollar company within a 10-year period.”

[Image: Tesla Motors]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • Conslaw Conslaw on Jan 23, 2018

    The way I see it, Musk imagines something, does the math in his head, and if he can't see a reason that absolutely prevents something from working, he tries it. That's pretty cool in and of itself. If he gets a handle on the whole distributed power generation thing before anybody else does, that part of Tesla's business will be larger than the transportation side. The intermodal transportation side of Tesla is not developed, but you can see where it is going. The Hyperloop isn't really designed to carry passengers. It is designed to carry cargo away from congested container ports to an intermodal transportation center for further distribution. Tesla's electric semis will be very useful for transportation in intermodal corridors. Tesla's solar roofing and powerwalls could be big after a few iterations. Tesla is rapidly gaining the know-how for large-scale solar power-generation plants. In the next few years, I can see Tesla powering past General Electric (now worth $146 b market cap), the company founded by Nikola Tesla's rival and one-time employer, Thomas Edison.

  • 9Exponent 9Exponent on Jan 24, 2018

    Mr. Musk, I don't use the word 'hero' lightly, but you are the greatest hero in American history.

  • Schen72 2022 Toyota Sienna, 25k miles[list][*]new 12V battery, covered by warranty[/*][*]new tires @ 24k miles[/*][*]oil change every 10k miles[/*][*]tire rotation every 5k miles[/*][/list]2022 Tesla Model Y, 16k miles[list][*]nothing, still on original tires[/*][/list]
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh Elon hates bad press (hence TWITTER circus) So the press jumping up and down screaming ''musk fails cheap EV'' is likely ego-driving this response as per normal ..not to side with tesla or musk but canceling the 25k EV was a good move, selling a EV for barely above cost is a terrible idea in a market where it seems EV saturation is hitting peak
  • 1995 SC Wife has a new Ridgeline and it came with 2 years so I don't have to think about it for a while.My FIAT needed a battery (the 12V...not the drive battery), a replacement steering column cover and I had to buy a Tesla Charging adapter to use the destination charger at one of the places I frequent. Also had to replace the charge cable because I am an idiot and ran the stock one over and destroyed the connector. Around 600 bucks all in there but 250 is because of the cable.The Thunderbird has needed much the past year. ABS Pump - 300. Master Cylinder 100. Tool to bleed ABS 350 (Welcome to pre OBD2 electronics), Amp for Stereo -250, Motor mounts 150, Injectors 300, Airbag Module - 15 at the u pull it, Belts and hoses, 100 - Plugs and wires 100, Trans fluid, filter and replacement pan, 150, ignition lock cylinder and rekey - 125, Cassette Player mechanism - 15 bucks at the U Pull it, and a ton of time to do things like replace the grease in the power seat motots (it was hard and the seats wouldn't move when cold), Rear pinion seal - 15 buckjs, Fix a million broken tabs in the dash surround, recap the ride control module and all. My wife would say more, but my Math has me around 2 grand. Still needs an exhaust manifold gasket and the drivers side window acts up from time to time. I do it all but if I were paying someone that would be rough. It's 30 this year though so I roll with it. You'll have times like these running old junk.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Besides for the sake of emissions I don’t understand why the OEM’s went with small displacement twin turbo engines in heavy trucks. Like you guys stated above there really isn’t a MPG advantage. Plus that engine is under stress pulling that truck around then you hit it with turbos, more rpm’s , air, fuel, heat. My F-150 Ecoboost 3.5 went through one turbo replacement and the other was leaking. l’ll stick with my 2021 V8 Tundra.
  • Syke What I'll never understand about economics reporting: $1.1 billion net income is a mark of failure? Anyone with half a brain recognizes that Tesla is slowly settling in to becoming just another EV manufacturer, now that the legacy manufacturers have gained a sense of reality and quit tripping over their own feet in converting their product lines. Who is stupid enough to believe that Tesla is going to remain 90% of the EV market for the next ten years?Or is it just cheap headlines to highlight another Tesla "problem"?
Next