Junkyard Find: 2000 Chevrolet Metro Hatchback

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Starting with the Chevrolet Sprint in 1985, General Motors sold rebadged versions of the Suzuki Cultus all the way through the 2001 model year. For the 1989 through 1997 model years, these cars were sold as Geo Metros; after the demise of the Geo brand, they became Chevrolets.

Unlike most miserable econoboxes, the Metro’s decades-long reputation for frugality has kept it on the road for longer than most of its competition, and 21st-century examples are very rare in wrecking yards. Here’s one in a Denver self-service yard.

I looked for a 2001 Metro for quite a while, since I enjoy photographing final-year-of-long-production cars in junkyards, but had to settle for a 2000. This one averaged well over 12,000 miles per year over its lifetime, and still looks pretty clean.

A four-cylinder engine displacing a cavernous 1.3 liters was available as an option for much of the Metro Era, but this car has the penny-pinching 1.0-liter three-cylinder. The four-banger was good for 79 horsepower in 2000, but this car had just 55.

At least it has the five-speed manual transmission, which reduced the misery level somewhat. I once owned a can’t-pass-up-this-deal cheap 1996 Metro with the four-cylinder and automatic, and it was dangerously slow.

The later Metros were built in Ontario by the Suzuki-GM CAMI partnership, so this patriotic gas-sipper is pure North American.

Air conditioning was available in these cars, as can be seen by the block-off plate for the A/C button.

Harlan Ellison liked this car very much, if we are to believe this commercial for the final Geo-badged Metros.

In Japan, these cars weren’t considered incredibly small, but they were still pitched to the frugal.






Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 27 comments
  • Turf3 Turf3 on Jan 08, 2018

    I spent some time in a rental unit some years back. It wasn't really that slow, but you had to drive it like an Italian - foot down to the floor at all times. In fact it was downright perky with only the driver in it, right up to about 65 mph at which point all the "go" was gone. I gave three guys a ride to the airport in it and the added weight made an enormous difference.

    • JohnTaurus JohnTaurus on Jan 08, 2018

      I gave three friends a ride in my 1988 Taurus L, with the 2.5L I-4 and 3 speed auto. One was over 300 lbs and the other two were 250 lbs easy, each. It was not a fast trip. Especially up a steep hill. The 2.5L begged me for mercy, but I held it to the floor, barely topping 35 mph. I had two friends in my old 2.0L Camry, it made a difference as well. They were both over 200 lbs and you could feel the car was noticeably slower, and the handling was even worse than usual. Lots of leaning in corners, with some front-end plowing. Keep in mind, I weighed about 150-160 lbs at both times.

  • JEFFSHADOW JEFFSHADOW on Jan 09, 2018

    Of course Harlan Ellison drove one of theses GEOs for many years-(CA license:HE) I had been reading Ellison's work since 1978 and liked the commercial also. He now has a late 40s Packard which you can find in an Ellison Wonderland "home" video on YouTube!

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next