It's The End of the Sedan as We Know It (and I Feel Fine)

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Actually, I don’t feel fine. Far from it, in fact. Ever since I can remember, there has been a three-box sedan in my family’s driveway — both before and after I was old enough to buy by own vehicles. Midsize sedans used to be the default choice for most families in my hardscrabble hometown, parked cheek-to-jowl with rusty pickups at the local grocery store.

Now, our inky-black Charger is the exception rather than the rule in the school drop-off queue. Save for a CTS next door and a Mazda 3 down the street, we’re about the only household around with a sedan in the drive. The midsize four-door is in a bad way.

Through November of last year, every single midsize sedan in America, save for the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry, recorded double-digit declines in sales. It’s a sea of red, like the departure board at JFK during a so-called snow bomb cyclone. Even those two models, nameplates steeped in value and recently refurbished unto the zenith of plushness, were off by about three percent in 2017. If those two storied brands can’t plant the seeds of growth, what hope do the rest of them have?

Efficiency and aerodynamic advancements in the sedan’s crossover brethren are quickly scuppering the value-add that four-doors once held over their stilt-wearing cousins. A front-drive 2018 Ford Edge with the prole-spec 3.5-liter V6 and six-speed automatic holds but a single mpg over its Taurus cousin with the same drivetrain. So equipped, the Edge is, naturally, $4,000 more expensive to the consumer, and likely brings a lot more profit to the Glass House.

It doesn’t matter. Know why? Ford will gladly stretch the note for an Edge over 84 month at a subvented rate of 2.99 percent. The Taurus? 4.9 percent for the same terms. When America runs on monthly payments, you can guess which machine the customer will drive off the lot.

Other forces are at work, too. Manufacturers have economy targets to meet, and it’s not like sedans provide a big boost to the corporate average anymore. Building sedans takes up space on a production line, space which could be occupied by a higher-margin crossover. Witness the current mania being flung around the internet about the state of the next Ford Fusion. This is all without mentioning the fact that many customers like the feeling of sitting high in traffic, whether all four wheels are driven or not.

When this author and his wife bought a Ford Edge in 2009 to accompany our five-year-old Lincoln LS, I remarked at the time that if it was ’89 instead of ’09, we’d be signing the note on a Taurus wagon instead. I maintain that opinion. The Edge met its fate in a high-speed accident (no major injuries), at which point I returned to my senses and bought another sedan – the Charger, which is now fully paid off.

Further back in my rapidly aging memory banks, I can recall reading the Touring page of C/D back in the early ‘90s – y’know, when buff books stretched to nearly 200 pages and weren’t wall-to-wall with WeatherTech ads. They did, however, at the back of the book, have those odd FBI SEIZURE CAR ads and scandalous girly phone numbers to call, both of which bewildered and bewitched my pre-teen eyes. Anyway…

Some author – perhaps it was Bedard or Csere, I can’t recall – was pontificating about the then-new Ford Explorer. A quote harvested from a dealer has been seared into my brain ever since my retinas registered the ink on that page: “Most buyers traded in a car – often a sporty model.” The stage was set, even back then.

Today, I do a double-take whenever I see a wagon version of the Accord. I know Steph definitely spins around every time a Camry coupe drives past. Consumer demand necessitated the demise of these trims. Do you think in 20 years, when I’m the ripe old age of 57, I’ll be craning my neck to get a glimpse of a passing four-door sedan and saying, “I remember those!”

Of course, consumer tastes change like the wind, and the early ‘80s saw the station wagon reduced to a dusty corpse, slumped limply in the corner glowering at the Chrysler Magic Wagon and silently shouting “J’accuse!” as each minivan filled with happy families drove past. Perhaps there is a cycle at work this time as well, but I don’t think so.

I am certain there is a parallel universe out there in which the Ford Explorer was never built, the SUV boom never took off, and one can waltz into a Chevy showroom and select from any number of Impala and Caprice sedans instead of high-riding Equinox and Traverse crossovers. Alas, such is not the case on this particular Earth.

[Image: Honda]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 155 comments
  • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Jan 05, 2018

    Nice piece. However take into account the fact Camcord offers predictable results, comfort, rear seat and trunk room at a somewhat reasonable price. The competition cannot offer all of those things at once, which is why they mostly suck. We'll never know what the market would be if there were more than two choice options in the segment.

  • Suto Suto on Jan 07, 2018

    It's not 500 words, but here's my take: Moms gotta sit up high.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next