Say It Ain't So! Docs Suggest Chevrolet Cruze Losing Manual Transmission

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

After a year of good news (McDonald’s all-day breakfast came to Canada), it seems only fitting that 2017 will end in tears.

The Chevrolet Cruze, one of a shrinking number of models in which one can easily find a manual transmission, appears set to lose that option after the 2018 model year. As the owner of a manual-shift Cruze, no words can ease the pain.

The glaring product shift appears in General Motors’ 2019 VIN decoder document, posted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration late Thursday. As of yet, we haven’t heard back from Chevrolet to confirm the document shows the full range of planned 2019 models.

For buyers of 2018 models, the Cruze offers a six-speed manual transmission on numerous trims — from the L, LS, LT, and Diesel sedan, to the LT and Diesel hatch. That’s a fair bit of stick availability in a world that’s rapidly shedding the third pedal. For 2019, however, the option disappears. Added to the lineup, however, is a continuously variable transmission.

It looks like the row-your-own lifestyle is leaving the Cruze lineup in favor of the efficient, shiftless experience afforded by a CVT, though we don’t know where exactly that tranny will appear. A conventional automatic, assumed to be the existing six-speed unit, continues throughout the Cruze line. (Diesels carry a nine-speed.)

As for powertrains, the model’s second-generation turbocharged 1.4-liter four-cylinder carries over into 2019, as does the 1.6-liter diesel introduced for 2017. What’s new is a CNG version of the 1.4, as well as a 1.5-liter offering. The latter engine is a turbocharged unit that serves as the entry-level engine in the Chevrolet Malibu, making 160 horsepower and 184 lb-ft of torque in that application.

If 2018 is truly the last year for the manual-shift Cruze, its mourners could probably fit in a small bus. Stick-shift take rates in North America hover in the low single-digit range. Still, the Cruze always seemed to lead the U.S. compact pack in the “Save the manuals!” parade. When it debuted back in late 2010, the model’s Eco variant advertised 42 miles per gallon on the highway, all thanks to a long-legged six-speed manual with triple overdrive gearset. A 2018 1.4-liter model with stock six-speed currently rates a 40 mpg highway figure.

The diesel model, however, rates an impressive 52 mpg highway figure when equipped with a six-speed stick. That number drops to 45 mpg when matched with the nine-speed automatic.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • Skotastic Skotastic on Dec 18, 2017

    I really want to jump on the 'new automatics are better - sticks are for dinosaurs' bandwagon. I really do. But then I actually drove them. Does any enthusiast actually enjoy a modern automatic in a 4-banger and think they are better than a stick in real world driving? I mean they are frustrating, often in the wrong gear, often searching, and just a general PITA. I mean, if I were in heavy daily traffic, I'd got with a slushbox, no doubt, as the convenience outweighs the frustration, but from a pleasurable driving experience perspective, I just don't get it, even though I want to.

  • Moments Of Inspiration Moments Of Inspiration on Dec 18, 2017

    I find the Cruze automatic works really well, albeit revs up a little high when pressing the pedal moderately. I would have preferred the Cruze to run more stoic at mid acceleration, and rev lower, than rev higher at lean burn.

  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
  • 1995 SC No
  • Analoggrotto I hope the walls of Mary Barra's office are covered in crushed velvet.
Next