More Passenger Car Blues as GM Throttles Back in Canada

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

General Motors’ Detroit-Hamtramck assembly plant isn’t the only facility hit hard by the public’s growing distaste for traditional highway cruisers. Falling full-size sedan sales turned out the lights at that plant last month, and GM’s Oshawa, Ontario plant will follow suit in January, returning with a missing shift once production resumes.

Like Hamtramck, the Oshawa plant builds the Chevrolet Impala sedan, and is the sole domestic builder of the Cadillac XTS. As the only remaining front-wheel-drive passenger car in the brand’s lineup, the XTS — saved from execution and refreshed for 2018 — didn’t stage a repeat performance of its October sales climb in November.

According to The Globe and Mail, the Oshawa plant’s passenger car production will cease for the first three weeks of January. Following that, the current two shifts transition to a single shift through the end of March. In order to avoid layoffs, workers on the plant’s Flex Line will rotate their weeks of work, though what lies in store for next spring and summer remains a mystery.

Oshawa, which handled six models just a few years ago, was feared to be in danger of closing until it reached a deal last year to perform final assembly of full-size pickups. The CAMI plant in Ingersoll, Ontario used to send overflow Chevrolet Equinox production to Oshawa, but that practice dried up last summer.

Cadillac XTS sales fell 27 percent in the U.S. in November, year-over-year, with sales over the first 11 months of 2017 down 21 percent. In October, the model posted a surprising 49.5-percent year-over-year sales increase.

Impala sales, while heading in the right direction in some respects, aren’t doing great when you consider the bigger picture. Despite a 13-percent reduction in GM fleet sales last month (and a 24-percent decrease in vehicles sent to rental agencies), Impala sales rose 54.1 percent, year-over-year, in November. The nameplate rose 24 percent in October, though Impala sales tend to vary wildly month to month. Overall, this year has seen Impala sales slip 21.5 percent.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 17 comments
  • WalterRohrl WalterRohrl on Dec 02, 2017

    I am curious if the sales of the Impala (and really, all of the sedan lines out there that are experiencing a sales freefall) would be improved if a wagon variant was added. Think about it - it'd be extremely easy and fast to add to the same production line, the cost to the consumer would be minimally extra, the utility would be greatly enhanced over the sedan body style, and the fuel economy would be largely unchanged. The only thing that wouldn't occur would be the increased ride height of a CUV/SUV and perhaps the increased profitability to the manufacturer of steering a buyer into an existing CUV lineup instead, BUT the production line would see higher utilization/throughput. The only large-ish wagons out there currently are by Volvo and Mercedes (or am I forgetting one?). There could well be a market for an Impala or LaCrosse Wagon, and likely for a Sonata, Altima, and Mazda6 as well as perhaps Passat.

  • CincyDavid CincyDavid on Dec 04, 2017

    Rented a black Impala LT v6 recently, and was duly impressed. Some misaligned dash trim was a little underwhelming but it drove well and had a huge interior. I was helping my BIL do some work on his '16 Impala yesterday and was amazed at the cheap lug wrench and jack that car comes with...stamped steel lug wrench instead of the cast alloy item in my Hondas and shiny black steel wrench in the Kia. It's little bits of cheapness that turn me off with GM. Does it really matter, probably not, but it just felt cheesy. The inch of water in the spare tire well of a 2 year old car was a little odd too...

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next