Sergio Talked to the Feds About UAW Corruption Investigation

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Apparently, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles CEO Sergio Marchionne had an extended chat with authorities at the U.S. Attorney’s Office in downtown Detroit one year before the $4.5 million corruption scandal involving the automaker’s training center was made public.

Marchionne and his lawyer participated in a private meeting in July 2016, discussing the alleged corruption between FCA executives and high-ranking members of the UAW with investigators. One year later, former Fiat Chrysler Vice President Alphons Iacobelli was indicted and accused of funneling kickbacks to UAW officials.

According to The Detroit News, there was some speculation of Marchionne’s involvement in the actual crime. But sources familiar with the event claimed he was not subpoenaed and appeared to arrive voluntarily. He has also not be charged with any wrongdoing, so we’re not raising any eyebrows or pointing fingers. For all we know, Sergio could have helped finger the culprit from the beginning.

“If a subordinate is charged with a crime … you ought to be concerned,” explained Peter Henning, a Wayne State University law professor and ex-federal prosecutor. “This doesn’t mean [Marchionne’s] done anything wrong. This is a process that is fraught with great risk so you want good counsel to guide you through it and see if you have any criminal exposure.”

As things stand, it appears as though only a handful of auto executives and UAW officials were involved. However, a federal investigation has turned its attention to both General Motors’ and Ford’s possible involvement in a similar misappropriation of training funds. Still, there’s no supporting evidence we’re aware of and all three automakers have said they’re happy to cooperate with the FBI during its investigation.

“Fiat Chrysler has to appear cooperative,” Henning continued. “No one wants to start yelling ‘Fifth Amendment.’ That sends a signal to the government that there’s at least smoke, and maybe fire.”

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
 2 comments
  • Indi500fan Indi500fan on Nov 06, 2017

    I'd have to think Big Serge (or his consigliere) would be sure to have plausible deniability on a deal like this. There's probably some US-based labor relations domo that may be in for some heat though. I was never high enough in the ranks at GM to see anything like the FCA fraud, but there were plenty of stealth payoffs to the local union officials. These guys were "on the clock" for incredible numbers of hours per month, and when combined with shift premiums, weekend premiums, holiday premiums, etc took home some serious dough. Of course "on the clock" often meant hanging out at the "fitness center" or snoozing in the UAW "work center" in the plant.

  • RHD RHD on Nov 06, 2017

    Somewhere in Detroit, or maybe New Jersey: "Rocco, I gotta job fer yous." "Sure, boss, whaddaya need me ta do?" "Old Sergio is squawkin' like a parrot to the Feds. Da wop needs ta get whacked." "Gotcha, boss, Consider it done."

  • Analoggrotto The ORDER BOOKS in Australia have netted 300% above projection. Australia is so awesome and they are embracing the Telluride DIesel to overtake the Prado. Pentagon data, and eATPs rule the discussion, bar none. Toyota fans can go home with their sorry little turbo 4 cylinder.
  • Analoggrotto Such a loving artful tribute to TTAC's greatest godfather is much welcomed. There's a new and better PORSCHE and they are from SOUTH KOREA baby! After years of Japanese oppression, SOUTH KOREA is the TIGER of the Far EAST. We just need a modern day James Dean and that would be Rhys Millen!
  • Groza George Our roads and bridges are crumbling and increasing vehicle weight will only make bridges crumble faster. We need more infrastructure work.
  • Wolfwagen Pennsylvania - Two long straights, 1 medium straight, 1 super short straight and a bunch of curves all on one end
  • Haze3 EV median weight is in the range of 4500-5500lbs, similar to the low end of full size pickup trucks and SUV's or typical mid-size PU's and SUV's. Obviously, EV Hummers and PU's are heavier but, on average, EV=PU or mid/full SUV is about right. EV's currently account for ~1% of the cars on the road. PU's account for 17% and SUV's count for over 40%. If we take out light SUV's, then call it 30% SUV or so. So, large-ish PU's and SUV's, together, account for ~50% of the US fleet vs 1% for EV's. As such, the fleet is ALREADY heavy. The problem is that EV's will be making the currently lighter 50% heavier, not that PU/SUV haven't already done most of the damage on avg mass.Sure, the issue is real but EV responsibility is not. If you want to get after heavies, that means getting after PU/SUV's (the current problem by 40-50x) first and foremost.
Next