Faraday Future's Bizarre Response Letter to the Public

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Faraday Future has issued a strange response to the criticism surrounding its most recent high-profile “staffing adjustment.” Last week, news broke that the startup automaker’s chief financial officer, Stefan Krause, left the firm in October — forcing media outlets to play catch up. When the information made its way to The Truth About Cars, we dug back into Faraday’s current condition and reported that things were still a mess at its California headquarters.

Unwilling to let the automotive media monopolize the conversation, Faraday released a response letter. In it, the company accuses Krause of being fired for “dereliction of duty” and said it would be taking legal action against him. It’s the first time the startup had updated its media page in months and is a peculiar reaction to a staffing change that, at the time, seemed like the least of Faraday’s worries.

First of all, Krause’s entire job was to bring the firm back from the brink of financial ruin (and he had precious little time in which to do it, having been hired in March of this year). Any “malfeasance” or criminal activity he’s responsible for must have had a pretty quick turnaround. But that appears to be the official corporate position on the matter. The company’s release claims Krause was hindering FF’s fundraising efforts, assumedly intentionally.

“Stefan Krause’s possible violation of law and lack of contribution to FF’s goals over the course of his leadership since March has led to severe damages to the interests of FF and its investor,” the statement reads. “FF is currently taking legal actions as a result of Stefan Krause’s malfeasance and dereliction of duty.”

Jalopnik, which first announced the CFO’s October departure, added some clarity via news of an intercepted internal memo from chief financier Jia Yueting. “I know we have a dedicated team of more than 1,000 employees globally who continue every day, despite challenging head winds [sic] and disbelievers, to push forward with our goal of bringing FF 91 to market,” Jia wrote in the email.

The letter also announced that Faraday would make a public response regarding Krause’s “termination” and verified that the company would pursue legal retribution against the former CFO. Krause maintains that the company has mischaracterized the situation by falsely describing the circumstances in which he left Faraday, while making baseless claims against him.

If that’s true, what Faraday hopes to gain by throwing him under the bus is anyone’s guess. It’s not like the company’s problems began when he was brought on board six months ago.

Interestingly, Faraday’s public release also announced the termination of Ulrich Kranz, FF’s chief technology officer. Like Krause, Kranz had only been appointed to his role a few months earlier and may have also resigned weeks before the official firing announcement was made. The company specified that “this termination wouldn’t affect the R&D process and product development of [FF 91].”

[Image: Faraday Future]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 7 comments
  • Conundrum Conundrum on Nov 13, 2017

    Bluster is the weapon of the J Winton Snively crowd when caught out. If FF hasn't been paying its bills to suppliers as reported, there are apparently 1,000 optimists working for them fueled by optimism and IOUs.

  • Brn Brn on Nov 13, 2017

    Where do I send my down payment for an FF 91?

    • JohnTaurus JohnTaurus on Nov 14, 2017

      I'll take it for 'em. Just make the check out to "cash". ;)

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next