Now Legal for Sale, 2017 Ram EcoDiesels Remain Thin on the Ground

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Looking for a full-size pickup with class-leading fuel economy? Can’t lick that diesel addiction, but not willing to go heavy duty? Since 2014, the Ram 1500 HFE has been your full-size, light-duty diesel go-to, at least until the Environmental Protection Agency yanked the model’s certification for the 2017 model year.

Following this year’s minor disagreement (the EPA wanted to know what those undeclared auxiliary emission control devices were all about, Fiat Chrysler said it was no big deal), as well as the federal investigations and lawsuits that followed, the thriftiest Ram is back on the market. In late July, environmental regulators finally gave the model a clean bill of health, certifying it for sale in the U.S.

However, Ram EcoDiesels are only now finding their way onto dealer lots.

According to Automotive News, two months passed before the first 2017 Ram 1500s equipped with the 3.0-liter EcoDiesel V6 became available to customers. Small numbers began appearing at dealerships in late September. Still, that doesn’t mean customers eagerly awaiting the model’s return will have an easy time finding one.

Though production kicked off in early July as certification drew near (and after FCA revamped the engine’s emission-control system), many dealerships still haven’t received their orders. Cars.com lists a single new 2017 Ram HFE for sale in Newton, North Carolina.

Visitors to Ram’s website might also be hard-pressed to discover the HFE. The fuel-sipper doesn’t appear in the model overview window, though a mention of 420 lb-ft of torque appears if visitors scroll down far enough on the Ram 1500 landing page. Under the detailed specifications tab, the EcoDiesel doesn’t show up in the engine or option groups sub-menus. Only if a prospective buyer utilizes the website’s build and price tool will they quickly discover Ram sells a rear-drive Tradesman HFE for a starting MSRP of $37,895. That’s an $11,400 increase over a base Tradesman, though the diesel version includes four doors (as well as a $6,250 cash allowance for California customers).

The engine remains optional on other trims, but, at $4,270, it’s nearly triple the cost of upgrading to a 5.7-liter V8. Equipped with an eight-speed automatic, the Ram EcoDiesel (in rear-drive guise) manages 29 miles per gallon on the highway and 21 mpg in the city. The same engine does double duty in the Jeep Grand Cherokee.

It’s quite possible FCA will have to keep the 2017 model in production for some time, as 2018 EcoDiesels are not yet certified. Meanwhile, the same fix applied to 2017 models is now available to owners of 2014-2016 EcoDiesels. FCA claims the software modifications won’t impact fuel economy.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 15 comments
  • Indi500fan Indi500fan on Oct 09, 2017

    I think the diesel fuel price premium and the initial cost price premium really hurts anything that's not a big HD version needing big rig torque. The economics aren't there short term (fuel cost per mile) or long term (maintenance with all the add-on devices).

    • See 2 previous
    • Brn Brn on Oct 09, 2017

      Don't forget increased maintenance and repair costs.

  • John Powell John Powell on Oct 17, 2017

    What about the increased maintenance on the eco-boost? They were a nightmare. The diesel particulate filters is just another way of selling environmental products. All the the particulates in the air in the U.S. is only 5% from diesel exhaust. While 30 % comes from China, maybe we just need to stop the earth from rotating and the wind from blowing. Then we could could lay off many government people whi just make jobs for themselves.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh *Why would anyone buy this* when the 2025 RamCharger is right around the corner, *faster* with vastly *better mpg* and stupid amounts of torque using a proven engine layout and motivation drive in use since 1920.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I hate this soooooooo much. but the 2025 RAMCHARGER is the CORRECT bridge for people to go electric. I hate dodge (thanks for making me buy 2 replacement 46RH's) .. but the ramcharger's electric drive layout is *vastly* superior to a full electric car in dense populous areas where charging is difficult and where moron luddite science hating trumpers sabotage charges or block them.If Toyota had a tundra in the same config i'd plop 75k cash down today and burn my pos chevy in the dealer parking lot
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I own my house 100% paid for at age 52. the answer is still NO.-28k (realistically) would take 8 years to offset my gas truck even with its constant repair bills (thanks chevy)-Still takes too long to charge UNTIL solidsate batteries are a thing and 80% in 15 minutes becomes a reality (for ME anyways, i get others are willing to wait)For the rest of the market, especially people in dense cityscape, apartments dens rentals it just isnt feasible yet IMO.
  • ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. 😉
  • Carson D I'd go with the RAV4. It will last forever, and someone will pay you for it if you ever lose your survival instincts.
Next