GM to Patent Temporary Digital Key?

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

A standard part of the dealership test drive experience involves the salesperson grabbing the key to the car in question out of a lockbox, then accompanying the customer on the drive. A new patent filing suggests General Motors may be looking for a way to give customers access to the car without requiring a salesperson to dig through a box of keys.

GM appears to be working on a patent that would allow customers to have a temporary digital key granted to them in order to gain access to a vehicle they want to test drive.

The system would work like this: Interested customer applies for the key, the dealer verifies the buyer’s interest and identity, dealer approves the test drive and monitors it. If the customer doesn’t want to buy the car, the dealer can revoke the digital key authentication, and it can also do the same to a prior key holder if the vehicle is used and someone other than the first title holder buys it.

It’s unclear what happens if the car is new and the customer is the first buyer – do they get a digital key to use while they own the car or a physical key fob like they would now? Or both? (A digital key could be useful to someone who loses or forgets a key fob – like those key pads on some Ford/Lincoln vehicles that allow entry to their owners.)

The system would make online car buying easier. Imagine if you could build and spec the car you wanted online and then use a digital key to test drive it – you’d minimize interaction with salespeople at your local dealer. You’d have the digital key, you’d show up, you’d test drive the car, and then if you decided to buy it, you’d either be whisked into the finance office or you could fill out all your documentation online while the car is prepped.

That doesn’t mean salespeople will be out of work – a human would still need to shepherd the process and be ready to answer questions – but it does mean that perhaps some of the more stressful interactions between customer and sales person can be cut, thus making the process more pleasant for all involved.

There’s also a level of security involved here. Dealers could stop anyone who tried to turn a test drive into a car theft, or to keep prospective buyers from taking advantage of an extended take-home test drive and extending it too long.

Not to mention the fact it cuts down on the cost of remaking lost keys, or the time wasted trying to track down a lost key while a customer waits impatiently. Your author once worked in the service department of a dealership and, even with fingerprint IDs and passwords protecting the key drawer, the system didn’t always work. Employees often misplaced keys or forgot to return them, thus leaving salespeople to scramble to find the key fob to a car that a customer wanted to drive. And the key box took up a decent chunk of floor space.

Okay, fine, there will still need to be space for a key drawer even if this system works – at least, as long as physical key fobs still exist. But imagine how much smoother the buying process will work if the physical keys stay in one place until the sale is complete.

There may be service applications, as well. A customer leaving his or her vehicle for work wouldn’t have to leave their keys when a temporary digital key could be used. A digital key could also be used to limit and/or monitor bad behavior by unscrupulous techs and service advisors.

It’s just a patent, for now, but it’s an intriguing one.

Hat tip to our own Bozi Tatarevic for once again digging up some very interesting docs.

[Images: General Motors, U.S. Patent Office]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 17 comments
  • Jalop1991 Jalop1991 on Oct 13, 2017

    Has anyone here shopped for a car recently? Keys are no longer stored in the key drawer, or in a central location. They're stored at the car, in a box. Salesdroid uses an app to unlock the box. Voila.

    • Eyeofthetiger Eyeofthetiger on Oct 13, 2017

      I am buying a new car tomorrow, so I will see. What they really need is to have the keys dropped at my house via Amazon drone, then have a bigger drone drop off the car.

  • Kyree Kyree on Oct 13, 2017

    There's another industry where this makes sense: buy-here-pay-here operations. Just think about it. They grant you temporary access that doesn't renew unless you make your payment. Instead of having to equip each vehicle with a pricey remote-dsiabling system, they can electronically revoke access to the car, and unless you're very good with computers, no amount of tinkering will grant you access back.

  • MaintenanceCosts In Toyota's hands, these hybrid powertrains with a single motor and a conventional automatic transmission have not been achieving the same kind of fuel economy benefits as the planetary-gear setups in the smaller cars. It's too bad. Many years ago GM did a group of full-size pickups and SUVs with a 6.0L V8 and a two-motor planetary gear system, and those got the fuel economy boost you'd expect while maintaining big-time towing capacity. Toyota should have done the same with its turbo four and six in the new trucks.
  • JMII My C7 isn't too bad maintain wise but it requires 10 quarts of expensive 0W-40 once a year (per GM) and tires are pricey due size and grip requirements. I average about $600 a year in maintenance but a majority of that is due to track usage. Brake fluid, brake pads and tires add up quickly. Wiper blades, coolant flush, transmission fluid, rear diff fluid and a new battery were the other costs. I bought the car in 2018 with 18k in mileage and now it has 42k. Many of the items mentioned are needed between 20k and 40k per GM's service schedule so my ownership period just happens to align with various intervals.I really need to go thru my service spreadsheet and put track related items on a separate tab to get a better picture of what "normal" cost would be. Its likely 75% of my spend is track related.Repairs to date are only $350. I needed a new XM antenna (aftermarket), a cargo net clip, a backup lamp switch and new LED side markers (aftermarket). The LEDs were the most expensive at $220.
  • Slavuta I drove it but previous style. Its big, with numb steering feel, and transmission that takes away from whatever the engine has.
  • Wjtinfwb Rivaled only by the Prowler and Thunderbird as retro vehicles that missed the mark... by a mile.
  • Wjtinfwb Tennessee is a Right to Work state. The UAW will have a bit less leverage there than in Michigan, which repealed R t W a couple years ago. And how much leverage will the UAW really have in Chattanooga. That plant builds ID. 4 and Atlas, neither of which are setting the world afire, sales wise. I'd have thought VW would have learned the UAW plays by different rules than the placid German unions from the Westmoreland PA debacle. But history has shown VW to be exceptionally slow learners. Watching with interest.
Next