In With the Old: FCA Plans to Ram Its Way Through 2018

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you know Ram will drop a new half-ton pickup at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit in January. It’s a big gamble redesigning a cash cow, lest the truck faithful turn up their noses at the new styling.

In the past, manufacturers have hedged their bets by simultaneously producing both the new and old styles, such as when Ford offered both the F-150 and F-150 Heritage in 2004. Now, Ram appears poised to deploy the same strategy in 2018, according to bossman Sergio Marchionne.

During last week’s FCA third-quarter earnings call, Marchionne disclosed that the company will continue making the current Ram through the calendar year 2018. Ram will have the manufacturing capacity to do so thanks to a retooled Sterling Heights Assembly Plant.

Sterling Heights will churn out the new Ram 1500 while the current bodystyle soldiers on at nearby Warren Truck Assembly Plant. More trucks on the ground is rarely a bad thing, as dealers understandably enjoy selling the high-margin machines. Plus, the extra capacity could give Ram a chance to knock Chevrolet’s Silverado down to third place on the sales charts.

Year-to-date, the entire light truck market is up 5.2 percent, with the Ram selling 374,901 pickups and the Silverado line finding 418,590 homes. Even with a new Ram on the horizon, that sales number represents a 3.8 percent increase over the same timeframe last year.

“My expectation is that we’ll run the old installation — and at least for the whole of 2018,” Marchionne said during last week’s earnings call. “Production capacity is confirmed, so it’s up to us to decide how long we run it.”

This author remembers it working at a Ford store in 2004, when we had the option of selling customers either the new F-150 or the F-150 Heritage Edition. Shoppers who wanted the latest and greatest were eagerly plugged into the new-style pickup, while those looking for value were shown the older model. Truth be told, it worked really well. July 2004 was the best month in our store’s history.

In most cases, manufacturers are able to offer the older version at a cut-rate price because development and tooling costs have been recouped ages ago. In Ram’s case, this will likely result in FCA initially cranking out top-dollar trims of the new truck to pad their bottom line and maximize transaction prices. The old style will be able to capture the lower-priced end of the market by offering heavier incentives without damaging the market value of the new truck. It’s a shrewd strategy, if the manufacturing capacity exists (and for Ram, it does).

If I occupied the manager’s chair at a Ram dealer, I’d be making damn sure my sales staff were strongly suggesting to customers considering a Colorado or Canyon that they can get a much bigger truck for similar money if they buy an old-style Ram. This is in addition to capturing a few brand loyal customers who are not cottoning to the new bodywork.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 43 comments
  • Indi500fan Indi500fan on Oct 31, 2017

    I think most of this is so they don't have to re-tool the plants simultaneously, which makes a lot of sense. I hope on the new one they fix the rust problem on the bed (above the rear wheel openings). There are so many nice looking Rams around here with that part rusted out way before anywhere else on the body - and I'm not even in the true Great Lakes salt belt.

    • True_Blue True_Blue on Oct 31, 2017

      That seems to be the only place they rot... but wow, do they rot horrendously from that area. Like 4"-6" of steel missing.

  • True_Blue True_Blue on Oct 31, 2017

    I want to commend the author for making a great case to consider the newer Ram, with that selected photo. Lord above is that an awful looking example. Highlighter green with almost-black wheels... and are those headlights factory? They look like the Amazon specials for $200 and free shipping.

  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
  • Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.
  • Dave Holzman '08 Civic (stick) that I bought used 1/31/12 with 35k on the clock. Now at 159k.It runs as nicely as it did when I bought it. I love the feel of the car. The most expensive replacement was the AC compressor, I think, but something to do with the AC that went at 80k and cost $1300 to replace. It's had more stuff replaced than I expected, but not enough to make me want to ditch a car that I truly enjoy driving.
  • ToolGuy Let's review: I am a poor unsuccessful loser. Any car company which introduced an EV which I could afford would earn my contempt. Of course I would buy it, but I wouldn't respect them. 😉
  • ToolGuy Correct answer is the one that isn't a Honda.
Next