With Mercedes-Benz Going Electrified, How Does the Company Avoid Tanking?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Everyone’s doing it. It’s as popular as the fidget spinner and Pokémon Go crazes all those years months ago. In a rush to signal their environmental bonafides and display their dedication to the Next Big Thing, luxury automakers are tripping over themselves in an effort to promise an all-electrified model lineup as soon as technology and finances allow.

This time, it’s Mercedes-Benz. The world’s oldest car brand doesn’t want its rivals cashing in once governments around the globe start turning off the fossil fuel taps. So, earlier this week, Daimler CEO Dieter Zetsche stepped up and made a promise we’ve heard ad nauseum as of late: every model in the brand’s lineup will soon sport some form of electric propulsion, be it a hybrid setup or full-on battery electric powertrain.

For Mercedes-Benz, this means 50 hybrid or EV models, including at its irrelevant-to-Americans Smart brand. The move isn’t without a steep cost, however — Daimler is bracing for a slashing of vehicle profit margins. In some cases, the green collected from green cars could be half that of a gasoline Benz. What to do?

“In the beginning of the cycle we believe that we will have to face a significantly lower margin,” said Frank Lindenberg, vice president of finance and controlling at Mercedes-Benz Cars, in an investor meeting this week. He added, “We are still aiming for a 10 percent return on sales, but have to be prepared for a kind of transition, with a corridor of 8 to 10 percent.”

First off, the company must find savings to offset the hit. The automaker’s Fit for Leadership 4.0 streamlining plan targets $4.8 billion in savings by 2025, which Mercedes-Benz’s parent feels should compensate for the lost profitability. It should also make up for increased investment in production and R& D.

Expenditures on plant investment and R&D at Daimler’s car division (which earns the bulk of the company’s revenue) rose from $4.28 billion and $5.59 billion, respectively, in 2015 to $4.97 billion and $6.78 billion last year. The forecast for 2017? $6.18 billion and $7.25 billion. Expenses at Daimler’s other commercial divisions are predicted to stay flat, or just barely budge. Moving past this year, the company plans to find nearly $1.2 billion in savings in R&D, a similar amount in fixed costs, and the rest in product costs.

Part of the automaker’s plan, Reuters reports, has to do with production. With the brand’s first fully electric vehicle, the EQC utility vehicle (based on last year’s Concept EQ and scheduled to start production in 2019), Mercedes-Benz can’t simply dive into EVs on a hope and a prayer. In an investor call this week, the company used the electric SUV as an example.

Sharing a platform with the dino juice-powered GLC, the EQC will also share its assembly plant. Daimler implies production will start out slow, ramping up if and when consumers demand more. If the electric SUV turns out to be an instant hit, well, the company’s profit hit arrives sooner than planned.

By 2025, EV profitability should be on par with conventional cars, Daimler claims.

Going by last year’s sales figures, Mercedes-Benz’s largest growth markets are Europe and China, both of which are keen on legislating away gasoline and diesel. It makes sense for Daimler to pursue a cautious electrification plan. Still, European suppliers who have long depended on Daimler for their livelihoods aren’t too happy about any of this.

Surely there’s other ways of being nice to the planet (while keeping jobs away from China), they’ve implored.

“We need to provide a sensible transition period that doesn’t give unwanted gifts to our Chinese friends,” said Roberto Vavassori, president of the European Association of Automotive Suppliers, after Daimler’s announcement. The organization doesn’t want to see massive quantities of batteries sourced predominantly from Asian nations. Vavassori estimates automakers would send $5,000 to $8,000 to China for every electric car produced in Europe — revenue diverted from European businesses.

Suppliers make up 5 million of the roughly 12.6 million auto industry-related jobs in the European Union.

[Image: Daimler AG]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 29 comments
  • Brandloyalty Brandloyalty on Sep 14, 2017

    http://www.thinkprogress.org/holcomb-coal-plant-is-a-long-shot-9a71b500b37e "the economic case for building a new coal-fired power plant in the U.S. has essentially evaporated — even without accounting for the costs of carbon pollution and the health impacts that stem from burning coal." "utilities are increasingly choosing to invest in renewable energy instead of coal simply because it is cheaper." "A March report from Moody’s Investors Service found that in the 15 states with the best wind resources, new wind generation now costs significantly less than existing coal-fired power plants."

    • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Sep 14, 2017

      Sinkprogress? Why not throw some Breitbart in there as well if we're going to quote fake news?

  • Autohausak Autohausak on Feb 17, 2020

    An electric vehicle, also called an EV, uses one or more electric motors or traction motors for creating momentum in a car or may be self-contained with a battery, solar panels or an electric generator to convert fuel to electricity and has been one of the most trending innovations at the starting of this 21st century. With Mercedes-Benz Electrical Intelligence(EQ), the electric future is here. Through expert engineering and cutting-edge technology, the next wave of Mercedes-Benz vehicles will usher in a new era of luxury driving and we must cope with it. The new EQ car comes with some truly great features and options but has one downside from the customer's side is the battery installed in the EQC is not doing well. For further studies check this link out by truth about cars itself: https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2020/01/report-battery-shortage-has-mercedes-benzs-newest-ev-struggling-to-clear-the-tower/

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next