Fiat Chrysler Automobiles Has Now Been Losing Sales For 12 Consecutive Months

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

August 2017 represented the twelfth consecutive month in which U.S. sales at Fiat Chrysler Automobiles declined on a year-over-year basis.

FCA volume slid 11 percent in August, a loss of nearly 21,000 sales, as retail and fleet volume declined. The decreases were most keenly felt at Jeep and Chrysler, which tumbled 15 percent and 33 percent, respectively. But Dodge, Ram, and Fiat sales also reported losses compared with August 2016.

More troubling than the poor August results, however, is the predictability of August’s results. FCA’s disappointing trendline began in September 2016. Year-over-year, FCA lost 187,000 sales over the last 12 months.

Of course, partly to blame for FCA’s malaise is the overall new vehicle market’s modest downturn. In each of the last eight months, FCA declined as the U.S. new vehicle market declined. The difference? FCA began losing sales as the U.S. auto industry gained thousands of sales at the tail end of 2016, and FCA’s decline is far more severe than the market at large.

Year-to-date, the U.S. auto market is off 2016’s record pace by just 3 percent. FCA, formerly Chrysler Group, was selling at its best rate in more than a decade last year, but is off that pace by 8 percent in 2017.

Chief among the reasons for Fiat Chrysler’s consistent slowdown is a major transition period at Jeep. With the JK Wrangler at the end of its line, sales growth in that model line has been nonexistent in 2017. The old Cherokee, not regarded as a class leader when it was new four years ago, is certainly not the leader of the pack now — Cherokee sales are down 25 percent this year and plunged 50 percent in August. The Patriot’s discontinuation and new Compass’s arrival resulted in a 70,646-unit loss through the first two-thirds of 2017. The Renegade’s 0.5-percent uptick is inconsequential. Only the Grand Cherokee’s 17-percent rise stands out as a meaningful positive.

Fortunately for FCA, these Jeep outcomes are expected to shift as the new Wrangler comes on board and the first-gen Compass/Patriot are forgotten. Moreover, these Jeep outcomes were not unanticipated. FCA has altered its fleet sales strategy, and that resulted in a 66-percent drop in Jeep fleet volume in August, for instance.

Then again, Jeep isn’t the only FCA brand reporting sharp declines. Chrysler, which is now just a two-model brand, reported a modest 12,652 total sales in August, a one-third drop from the same period a year ago. Chrysler brand car sales plunged 47 percent in August as the 200’s disappearance approaches completion and as 300 sales continue to dive. The bigger sedan reported a 23-percent August drop. Chrysler minivan sales, meanwhile, are down 9 percent this year as the brand moves into the more premium Pacifica phase, away from the Town & Country.

Fiat’s U.S. volume is down 14 percent this year. Dodge is off 5 percent. Ram sales, bolstered by a high-volume pickup truck line in a truck-friendly market, are up 5 percent this year, though the brand posted a marginal decline over the July/August period.

Of course, Alfa Romeo sales are on the rise, soaring 2,981 percent in August. (To 1,140 total sales.)

Alfa Romeo’s rise may represent a sliver of a silver lining, but FCA’s market share has nevertheless fallen from 13.0 percent during 2016’s first eight months to 12.4 percent in 2017.

[Images: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • Matt3319 Matt3319 on Sep 05, 2017

    Absolutely no surprise FCA is where it is at. Honestly Alfa and Fiat really don't even count since hardly anyone even buys them. The F-150 sells more in 10 minutes than Alfa/Fiat sells in a month. That a guess of course. Jeep and Ram, even with some old products(Ram 1500 is like 8 model years old I think) are keeping FCA alive. Dodge is doing ok I suppose. Chrysler has some nice products that I would buy. The 300S V6 is a really good looking car. Actually owned a 200S AWD and loved it. Sold it just as Sergio badmouthed the 200 which thankfully saved me 1000's in trade value. Owned 2 Cherokee Trailhawks and liked them both. My biggest complaint with those are the super small gas tank. 15.8 gallons on a SUV that gets like 20 MPG combined is 3-5 gallons to small. The 9spd worked well in all 3 of my cars I had but it felt lost in the Cherokee. If I could could I would buy a used 2016-17 Dodge Charger Hemi. They are a great deal in the $23-26K range. Same with the 300S V6. I can see why the Chinese only want Jeep.

  • Derekson Derekson on Sep 05, 2017

    What a coincidence, FCA sales drop off after they get busted for conspiring with Santander to push through subprime loans without validating credit. Truly a mystery here.

  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
  • Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.
  • Dave Holzman '08 Civic (stick) that I bought used 1/31/12 with 35k on the clock. Now at 159k.It runs as nicely as it did when I bought it. I love the feel of the car. The most expensive replacement was the AC compressor, I think, but something to do with the AC that went at 80k and cost $1300 to replace. It's had more stuff replaced than I expected, but not enough to make me want to ditch a car that I truly enjoy driving.
  • ToolGuy Let's review: I am a poor unsuccessful loser. Any car company which introduced an EV which I could afford would earn my contempt. Of course I would buy it, but I wouldn't respect them. 😉
  • ToolGuy Correct answer is the one that isn't a Honda.
Next