Ferrari: Almost Certainly Yes to the SUV, Probably No to a Reincarnated Dino

by Timothy Cain

Published: August 10th, 2017

ferrari almost certainly yes to the suv probably no to a reincarnated dino

2018 marks the 50th anniversary of Ferrari’s V6-engined Dino, an entry-level Ferrari that never actually wore Ferrari’s prancing horse badge.

With challenging regulatory environments and emissions targets to meet, 2018 surely seems like a fine time to resurrect the Dino name and concept. Yet it appears far more likely Ferrari will look to burst through its 10,000-unit annual production barrier with an FUV, rather than a Dino that, Automotive News reports, would likely be priced 20-percent below the current entry-level Ferrari.

The California T stickers from $202,723.

“We need to explore ways to attract customers to traditional values of the brand such as style, performance and engine sound before downgrading the entry level price for the brand,” Ferrari CEO Sergio Marchionne told analysts.

Downgrade. Pfft. Downgrading is for Porsche and McLaren.

It’s been a dozen years since Marchionne seemed certain that a Dino revival was a sure bet. In 2005, only the timing was in question. But amidst divergent plans at Ferrari’s executive level, departed Ferrari boss Luca di Montezemolo persistently rejected the defunct Dino’s overtures.

Fast forward to 2017 and Marchionne seems to believe the Dino may well not necessary. The less costly Dino would be an attempt on Ferrari’s part to attract younger buyers, but Marchionne already describes Ferrari’s burgeoning Asian buyer base as, “phenomenally young.” Meanwhile, the FUV is going to be responsible for shaking Ferrari’s money maker.

Globally, Ferrari sold a record 8,014 new vehicles in 2016, representing 5-percent year-over-year growth and enough production for the company to earn $432 million in net profit

According to The Wall Street Journal, U.S. Ferrari sales are up 5 percent to 1,421 units through 2017’s first seven months, more than double Lamborghini’s total.

Whether a Dino is set to join the almost-certain FUV in extending Ferrari’s lineup is a decision Ferrari has put off until the early part of next year. Wading into SUV waters is likely enough of a sea change for Ferrari’s loyal clientele for the time being.

[Image: Ferrari]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

#Dino #Ferrari #FerrariDino #FutureVehicles #ItalianSupercars #SergioMarchionnne #SportsCars #Supercars

Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 10 comments

Stingray65 on Aug 11, 2017

Ahh - the Dino 246 - nice looking and handling at a "bargain" Ferrari price, but also slower than a contemporary 911 or Corvette, made of steel that would turn into Swiss cheese in 3 years, offering a bus-like driving position, and propelled by a V-6 that needed a complete overhaul by 30,000 miles. I'm sure the world is waiting eagerly for another car from Ferrari offering the same enticing combination of features.

Like Reply
- Krhodes1 on Aug 11, 2017
  
  To be fair, other than being slower than a 911 your complaints applied to every other Ferrari in the Dino's era too. As the old saying went, Enzo sold you an engine and threw the rest of the car in for free. They were pretty much really fast pieces of crap. I'd argue they still are... But my interest in fast sports cars stops at the level of a base engine Porsche Cayman. I'd still take a Dino over an equivalent 911 - it's so pretty and less likely to go through a hedge backwards.
  
  Like
Bultaco on Aug 11, 2017

Excepting the dorky Bentayga and the boxy Range Rover, all of the new super premium SUVs look like cheaper models. The Jag resembles a Cherokee, the Maserati looks like a blobby Nissan Murano, etc. They just don't stand out, whereas nobody will ever mistake a Ferrari sports car for a Corvette. The SUV 2-box shape just doesn't lend itself to individualization like a sports car does. Now don't get me wrong, if Ferrari makes an SUV they'll have plenty of buyers who just want exclusivity. But really, is any buysr of one of those things ever going to care how fast it laps the Nurburgring? Does any new Range Rover ever see off-road condotions? Do any of the old men who buy Porsche Panamera Turbos ever explore that car's very high limits? My point is that most of the people who buy these very high end sedans and SUVs would be perfectly satisfied with a Lexus if they could accept the fact that they're everywhere and not exclusive.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

2manyvettes Since all of my cars have V8 gas engines (with one exception, a V6) guess what my opinion is about a cheap EV. And there is even a Tesla supercharger all of a mile from my house.
Cla65691460 April 24 (Reuters) - A made-in-China electric vehicle will hit U.S. dealers this summer offering power and efficiency similar to the Tesla Model Y, the world's best-selling EV, but for about $8,000 less.
FreedMike It certainly wouldn't hurt. But let's think about the demographic here. We're talking people with less money to spend, so it follows that many of them won't have a dedicated place to charge up. Lots of them may be urban dwellers. That means they'll be depending on the current charging infrastructure, which is improving, but isn't "there" yet. So...what would help EV adoption for less-well-heeled buyers, in my opinion, is improved charging options. We also have to think about the 900-pound gorilla in the room, namely: how do automakers make this category more profitable? The answer is clear: you go after margin, which means more expensive vehicles. So...maybe cheaper EVs aren't all that necessary in the short term.
RHD The analyses above are on the nose.It's a hell of a good car, but the mileage is reaching the point where things that should have worn out a long time ago, and didn't, will, such as the alternator, starter, exhaust system, PS pump, and so on. The interiors tend to be the first thing to show wear, other than the tires, of course. The price is too high for a car that probably has less than a hundred thousand miles left in it without major repairs. A complete inspection is warranted, of course, and then a lower offer based on what it needs. Ten grand for any 18-year-old car is a pretty good chunk of change. It would be a very enjoyable, ride, though.
Fred I would get the Acura RDX, to replace my Honda HR-V. Both it and the CRV seats are uncomfortable on longer trips.