Honda Ridgeline Gobbling up Midsize Market Share Before Ford Ranger Gets the Chance

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The Ford Ranger is poised to return to the domestic market in 2019, accompanied by all the fanfare befitting a junior American icon. Unless the Blue Oval totally botches the job, everyone anticipates the reborn Ranger becoming a big seller in the midsize truck market.

However, there’s already a smaller pickup syphoning off volume from its rivals before the Ranger can avail itself. While sales of most midsize truck models have been cooled by the gentle breeze of market stagnation, Honda’s second-generation Ridgeline has returned with a vengeance, enjoying favorable reviews and posting sales volume not witnessed in over a decade. While Honda still doesn’t move nearly as much midsized metal as Toyota’s Tacoma (which sold 191,631 units in the U.S. in 2016), the Ridgeline proves there is space in the marketplace for more than just body-on-frame offerings.

“This is a very capable truck that meets the needs of a vast majority of buyers,” Jeff Conrad, general manager of American Honda told Bloomberg. “For somebody who doesn’t care about towing 8,000 pounds … it’s perfect.”

Unfortunately, a large portion of truck buyers actually do care about towing capacity — especially on larger vehicles. But just how big a factor it is for the fluctuating midsize truck segment is debatable. The Ridgeline seems perfectly serviceable for persons of the small-business persuasion and anybody wanting a daily driver that can haul a reasonable load from time to time. It also has garnered loads of accolades and awards for its above-average interior, unparalleled safety, and superb handling characteristics. But it isn’t necessarily the “truck guy’s” pickup.

This is strongly reflected by the type of people buying them. Honda isn’t just stealing sales from its rivals, it’s bringing new buyers into the midsize truck market. In the last 12 months North American buyers have purchased over 40,000 Ridgeline pickups, and the automaker claims it could have sold more if the factory wasn’t already operating at full volume.

Buyers, especially former sedan shoppers, don’t seem to mind that Honda is offering a chopped-and-screwed Pilot as its pickup alternative. In fact, their shared DNA may be the Ridgeline’s greatest strength. At the very least, the manufacturer seems to understand its pickup is a different from the rest of the pack. It doesn’t sell the vehicle with a bevy of truck-like options and the majority of its television spots have featured wholesome DIY home projects, instead of promising masculine off-road adventures. Ads have also focused on the quality of its ride and fuel economy, rather than how lumpy you can make the tires.

“We didn’t want to try to out-tough the tough guys,” Conrad says. “Ford and GM have been doing their type of advertising for many, many years. It’s not really the nature of our truck — or our buyers.”

This leaves us wondering how Ford will handle the Ranger’s return. Honda is offering something the competition isn’t and, while it doesn’t check all of the boxes, there are good reasons to consider one in you’re in the market for midsize pickup. But it may not be a big enough blip on Ford’s radar to force changes on the upcoming truck. The assumed methodology for bringing the Ranger back into the U.S. is to facelift the existing global market vehicle, start American production, then pop champagne corks. However, if Ford doesn’t want Honda to continue its encroachment, it may want to consider offering something that sets it apart from body-on-frame competitors — because that strategy seems to be working.

[Image: Honda]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 81 comments
  • Vulpine Vulpine on Jul 13, 2017

    Were it not quite so large, this would be an almost perfect truck for me; it is the most utilitarian of all the pickup trucks simply because of what it has and the others don't. I just wish they chopped off about 1/3rd of the back seat (and overall length as a result) and made it a bit narrower. Honestly, I'm not happy with ANY of the other mid-sized offerings and I expect the Ranger to be just as bad.

  • Ponchoman49 Ponchoman49 on Jul 13, 2017

    LOL I have yet to see more than two of these out on the road in Upstate, NY this past year. Even the Honda dealer only seems to stock one or two examples and they have been sitting in the same spot all Summer. Gobbling is hardly what these things are doing. More like languishing.

    • See 1 previous
    • Vulpine Vulpine on Jul 14, 2017

      @bunkie Honest consideration is the least any automaker would ask of a potential buyer. Saying 'no' just because of brand or hearsay hurts everyone, one way or another. I know I say I won't buy a Ford new--I admit I don't like Fords. I don't like their looks, I don't like the reliability I've received from them, there are many things I don't like about Fords. But I am driving one and I will continue to do so until I find a small truck that meets my needs and wants, no matter the brand. If it's a Ford, so be it. But I also felt the same way about Fiat products because of hearsay. Now having owned two of them, I say the reputation they have is NOT deserved.

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next