Ace of Base: 2017 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD Base

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

For once, we have an Ace of Base entrant whose trim level is actually Base. Not Sport. Not XL. Base. Tell it like it is, Chevy.

Not long ago I sampled the Colorado in ZR2 trim, finding it to be an agreeable alternative to some of the other factory-built off-road trucks on the market. Let’s see how the base model treats its occupants.

The GMC Canyon went through our Ace of Base wringer nearly a year ago, proving that one can buy a small(ish) truck with rear-wheel drive and a stick shift in America. The base Colorado neatly performs the same trick, supplying an identical powertrain but with an added bonus: the Chevy is a full $885 less dear than the GMC. At this end of the price scale, that’s not an insignificant amount of simoleons, especially when the two trucks are virtually identical.

Make no mistake: this is a two-passenger conveyance. The extended cab’s rear seats have been binned in an Accountant-Approved(TM) penny pinching move, although economies of scale have dictated that the rear seatbelts remain, left to flap around like a forlorn windsock. It’s just as well, though — my experience in an extended cab ZR2 while traversing the Colorado wilderness proved the rear seats are merely token gestures when the front chairs are adjusted to fit Large Persons such as myself. The upshot is that space up front is best measured in acres, encouraging one to splay their legs and consider buying cowboy boots.

A 2.5-liter direct injected four-cylinder is mated to a six-speed manual box. An even 200 horses present themselves at 6,300 rpm; a short 4.10 rear end gear set will ensure you shouldn’t have much trouble reaching that level of revvage. Short gears mean quicker acceleration. Not much weight over the rear wheels mean burnout potential. Combined, these mean Very Fun Things.

Being part of the General’s large supply chain benefits the base Colorado, endowing it with niceties such as a backup camera, locking tailgate, power driver’s seat, and eight airbags. Recalling a time when base trucks were fitted with cardboard headliners (if they were lucky), the level of opulence found in the cheapest of GM trucks is remarkable. The mirrors might be manual folding but they are power adjustable, meaning one doesn’t have to roll down the window and place a greasy thumbprint on the glass. Not that you’ll be rolling down any side glass — power units, with an auto up/down for the driver, are standard.

Your color choices are limited to the greyscale. Get the black one. That shade will hide some of the unlovely expanses of black plastic on the base Colorado. Critically, air conditioning is standard, as is a hose-it-out vinyl floor. It should be noted that this utilitarian and practical floor covering is an extra-charge option on high-zoot F-150s. I kid you not.

Only $20,995 (including destination) for a handsome truck that has a more than a few creature comforts, can smoke the baloneys, and handily tow 3,500lbs? Sounds like an Ace of Base to us.

[Images: General Motors]

Not every base model has aced it. The ones which have? They help make the automotive landscape a lot better. Any others you can think of, B&B? Let us know in the comments. Naturally, feel free to eviscerate our selections.

The model above is shown with American options and is priced in Freedom Dollars. As always, your dealer may sell for less.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
14 of 53 comments
  • Daviel Daviel on Jul 05, 2017

    I had a white Ranger, basic, rear wheel drive, stick, roll up windows, radio. Great truck. A couple of bags of Sack-crete in the bed in winter took care of any traction problems,

  • Vulpine Vulpine on Jul 05, 2017

    All told, a real Ace... though the second you try to put ANY option onto it, the price jumps accordingly. One of these as an AWD (not 4x4) would be nice, though still bigger than I want.

    • See 11 previous
    • Vulpine Vulpine on Jul 08, 2017

      @gtem Proof: Pickup Trucks dot com mid-size shootout. http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2016/08/whats-the-best-midsize-pickup-for-2016.html#more http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2016/08/2016-midsize-pickup-challenge-what-the-judges-said.html#more http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2016/08/2016-midsize-pickup-challenge-off-road-performance.html#more http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2016-midsize-pickup-challenge/ While the Ridgeline might not be "base" in the sense that the Colorado in this article is; the question is whether or not an AWD system can be as good as a 4x4. For outright sport rock crawling, I would very probably say no, but the group of articles linked above (and other associated articles linked within the last one) show the Ridgeline was no slouch as a soft-road vehicle or as a light-duty truck in general.

  • Analoggrotto Does anyone seriously listen to this?
  • Thomas Same here....but keep in mind that EVs are already much more efficient than ICE vehicles. They need to catch up in all the other areas you mentioned.
  • Analoggrotto It's great to see TTAC kicking up the best for their #1 corporate sponsor. Keep up the good work guys.
  • John66ny Title about self driving cars, linked podcast about headlight restoration. Some relationship?
  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could make in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well. Compact trucks are a great vehicle for those who want an open bed for hauling but what a smaller more affordable efficient practical vehicle.
Next